Evaluation of a point-of-care device for creatinine measurement in nonazotemic pigs presented to a referral hospital.

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2026-02-24 Print Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.25.10.0367
Jamie S F Lemus, Barbara Delvescovo, Elizabeth Williams Louie, Stephen Parry, Stephanie A Hon, Marta Cercone, Rebecca C McOnie
{"title":"Evaluation of a point-of-care device for creatinine measurement in nonazotemic pigs presented to a referral hospital.","authors":"Jamie S F Lemus, Barbara Delvescovo, Elizabeth Williams Louie, Stephen Parry, Stephanie A Hon, Marta Cercone, Rebecca C McOnie","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.25.10.0367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare creatinine concentrations measured using a point-of-care unit (Nova StatSensor; NSS) to those from a comparison method (CM) chemistry analyzer from pigs presented at a referral institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical prospective study was performed including 61 pigs admitted to Cornell Nemo Farm Animal Hospital for clinical reasons. Heparinized blood samples were obtained by venous aspiration, and whole-blood samples were obtained via ear prick. Creatinine concentrations were subsequently measured in triplicate on the NSS (on heparinized venous samples [NSSven] and ear prick samples [NSSear]) and compared to the CM. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. A Bland-Altman plot was graphed based on a linear mixed-effects model to estimate agreement between tests. Equivalence testing was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NSSven (n = 110) and NSSear (71) from 61 nonazotemic pigs were analyzed. The mean creatinine ± SD was 1.3 ± 0.52 mg/dL from the CM, 1.1 ± 0.43 mg/dL from the NSSven, and 1.2 ± 0.42 mg/dL from the NSSear. Bias existed between average NSSven (-0.17 mg/dL) and NSSear (-0.21 mg/dL) and the CM. The 95% CI of the limit of agreement between the NSSven and CM was -0.88 to 0.54 and -1.04 to 0.62 between the NSSear and CM. The tests were not equivalent at 0.3 mg/dL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The NSSven, NSSear, and CM results are different and not equivalent in nonazotemic pigs.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The use of this device for screening of creatinine in pigs is discouraged based on the results in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.25.10.0367","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare creatinine concentrations measured using a point-of-care unit (Nova StatSensor; NSS) to those from a comparison method (CM) chemistry analyzer from pigs presented at a referral institution.

Methods: A clinical prospective study was performed including 61 pigs admitted to Cornell Nemo Farm Animal Hospital for clinical reasons. Heparinized blood samples were obtained by venous aspiration, and whole-blood samples were obtained via ear prick. Creatinine concentrations were subsequently measured in triplicate on the NSS (on heparinized venous samples [NSSven] and ear prick samples [NSSear]) and compared to the CM. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. A Bland-Altman plot was graphed based on a linear mixed-effects model to estimate agreement between tests. Equivalence testing was performed.

Results: NSSven (n = 110) and NSSear (71) from 61 nonazotemic pigs were analyzed. The mean creatinine ± SD was 1.3 ± 0.52 mg/dL from the CM, 1.1 ± 0.43 mg/dL from the NSSven, and 1.2 ± 0.42 mg/dL from the NSSear. Bias existed between average NSSven (-0.17 mg/dL) and NSSear (-0.21 mg/dL) and the CM. The 95% CI of the limit of agreement between the NSSven and CM was -0.88 to 0.54 and -1.04 to 0.62 between the NSSear and CM. The tests were not equivalent at 0.3 mg/dL.

Conclusions: The NSSven, NSSear, and CM results are different and not equivalent in nonazotemic pigs.

Clinical relevance: The use of this device for screening of creatinine in pigs is discouraged based on the results in this population.

评价一个点护理装置肌酸酐测量在非氮化猪提出转诊医院。
目的:比较使用即时护理装置(Nova StatSensor; NSS)测量的肌酐浓度与转诊机构提供的比较方法(CM)化学分析仪测量的猪肌酐浓度。方法:对61头因临床原因入住康奈尔尼莫农场动物医院的猪进行临床前瞻性研究。静脉抽吸取肝素化血,耳穿刺取全血。随后在NSS(肝素化静脉样本[nsssven]和耳穿刺样本[NSSear])上测量三份肌酐浓度,并与CM进行比较。进行配对t检验和类内相关系数分析。在线性混合效应模型的基础上绘制Bland-Altman图来估计试验之间的一致性。进行等效性检验。结果:对61头非氮化猪的nsssven (n = 110)和NSSear(71)进行了分析。CM组的平均肌酐±SD为1.3±0.52 mg/dL, NSSven组为1.1±0.43 mg/dL, NSSear组为1.2±0.42 mg/dL。平均nsssven (-0.17 mg/dL)和NSSear (-0.21 mg/dL)与CM之间存在偏倚。nsssven和CM之间一致性极限的95% CI为-0.88 ~ 0.54,NSSear和CM之间的95% CI为-1.04 ~ 0.62。在0.3毫克/分升的情况下,测试结果不相等。结论:非氮化猪的NSSven、NSSear和CM结果是不同的,而不是等效的。临床相关性:根据该人群的结果,不鼓励使用该设备筛选猪的肌酐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书