Combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and digital soil mapping for soil assessment in smallholder farms

IF 6.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Geoderma Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117749
Naveen K. Purushothaman , Kaushal K. Garg , Nagaraju Budama , Venkataradha Akuraju , K.H. Anantha , Ramesh Singh , M.L. Jat , Bhabani S. Das
{"title":"Combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and digital soil mapping for soil assessment in smallholder farms","authors":"Naveen K. Purushothaman ,&nbsp;Kaushal K. Garg ,&nbsp;Nagaraju Budama ,&nbsp;Venkataradha Akuraju ,&nbsp;K.H. Anantha ,&nbsp;Ramesh Singh ,&nbsp;M.L. Jat ,&nbsp;Bhabani S. Das","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2026.117749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and digital soil mapping (DSM) offer opportunities to rapidly assess soil in large areas. Specifically, the combined DRS-DSM modelling pipeline may be used to create soil test recommendations for every smallholder farm in a given region although comprehensive testing of such a pipeline is rarely attempted. With multi-year and multi-site soil spectral data from the smallholder farms of the Bundelkhand region, we evaluated the DRS-DSM pipeline for estimating soil properties and making nutrient recommendation for every smallholder farm both within and outside the DRS calibration zones. Specifically, we compared both measured and DRS-estimated soil properties as inputs in DSM approaches using 1112, 607, and 407 soil samples collected during 2018 (T<sub>2018</sub>: calibration zone), 2021 (T<sub>2021</sub>: within the calibration zone), and 2022 (T<sub>2022</sub>: outside the calibration zone), respectively, for estimating 17 soil parameters and their soil test crop response (STCR) ratings. For T<sub>2022</sub> samples, DRS models calibrated within the calibration zone accurately predicted 7 out of 17 soil properties with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (LCCC) exceeding 0.6. Spiking these datasets with T<sub>2022</sub> data further improved predictions to 10 properties and reduced errors by 3–29%. In T<sub>2021</sub> dataset, both measured property- and DRS-based DSM approaches achieved comparable accuracy. Estimated STCR rating accuracies for the DRS-DSM pipeline exceeded 70% for 9 out of 13 properties suggesting that these two emerging technologies may be combined to make nutrient recommendations across smallholder farms within a given region.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"467 ","pages":"Article 117749"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016706126000777","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and digital soil mapping (DSM) offer opportunities to rapidly assess soil in large areas. Specifically, the combined DRS-DSM modelling pipeline may be used to create soil test recommendations for every smallholder farm in a given region although comprehensive testing of such a pipeline is rarely attempted. With multi-year and multi-site soil spectral data from the smallholder farms of the Bundelkhand region, we evaluated the DRS-DSM pipeline for estimating soil properties and making nutrient recommendation for every smallholder farm both within and outside the DRS calibration zones. Specifically, we compared both measured and DRS-estimated soil properties as inputs in DSM approaches using 1112, 607, and 407 soil samples collected during 2018 (T2018: calibration zone), 2021 (T2021: within the calibration zone), and 2022 (T2022: outside the calibration zone), respectively, for estimating 17 soil parameters and their soil test crop response (STCR) ratings. For T2022 samples, DRS models calibrated within the calibration zone accurately predicted 7 out of 17 soil properties with Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients (LCCC) exceeding 0.6. Spiking these datasets with T2022 data further improved predictions to 10 properties and reduced errors by 3–29%. In T2021 dataset, both measured property- and DRS-based DSM approaches achieved comparable accuracy. Estimated STCR rating accuracies for the DRS-DSM pipeline exceeded 70% for 9 out of 13 properties suggesting that these two emerging technologies may be combined to make nutrient recommendations across smallholder farms within a given region.
漫反射光谱与数字土壤制图相结合用于小农农场土壤评价
漫反射光谱(DRS)和数字土壤制图(DSM)为快速评估大面积土壤提供了机会。具体地说,组合式DRS-DSM建模管道可用于为特定区域的每个小农农场创建土壤测试建议,尽管很少尝试对这种管道进行全面测试。利用来自Bundelkhand地区小农农场的多年和多站点土壤光谱数据,我们对DRS- dsm管道进行了评估,以估计土壤性质,并为DRS校准区内外的每个小农农场提供营养建议。具体而言,我们使用2018年(T2018:校准区)、2021年(T2021:校准区内)和2022年(T2022:校准区外)分别收集的1112、607和407个土壤样本,比较了实测和drs估计的土壤特性作为DSM方法的输入,以估计17个土壤参数及其土壤试验作物响应(STCR)评级。对于T2022样品,在校准区内校准的DRS模型准确预测了17种土壤性质中的7种,Lin’s一致性相关系数(LCCC)超过0.6。将这些数据集与T2022数据结合,进一步将预测结果提高到10个属性,并将误差降低了3-29%。在T2021数据集中,测量属性和基于drs的DSM方法都达到了相当的准确性。据估计,DRS-DSM管道的STCR评级准确度在13个属性中的9个超过70%,这表明这两种新兴技术可以结合起来,为特定地区的小农农场提供营养建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书