Nikolas Ballut , Andrés M. Urcuqui-Bustamante , Emily Minor
{"title":"Bird feeders and rat traps: Understanding the relationships among psychosocial factors, wildlife observations, and yard management decisions","authors":"Nikolas Ballut , Andrés M. Urcuqui-Bustamante , Emily Minor","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential yards and gardens provide a multitude of benefits for people, including green infrastructure, access to nature, and improved mental health. Yards can also benefit wildlife by providing habitat, food and other resources. Previous studies have shown that people manage their gardens in different ways to attract or deter wildlife and that visible wildlife diversity can increase people’s investment in nature and resource provisioning. These relationships between people and wildlife could form feedbacks with long-term consequences for biodiversity, but the way that various factors, including observations and perceived presence of wildlife in residential gardens, affect people’s management decisions remains largely unexplored. To understand how these relationships shape yard management decisions, we organized and synthesized existing international scientific literature on wildlife gardening, identified major gaps in current knowledge, and suggest directions for future research that could improve our understanding of the dynamic, potentially reciprocal relationships between residents, their gardening behaviors, and wildlife. We identified 53 relevant studies from North America, South America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia. Most studies employed a qualitative approach to examine how attitudes toward wildlife influenced gardening behavior, with other determinants of wildlife gardening relatively understudied in the context of this literature search. Only five studies directly asked residents about wildlife observations or perceived presence of wildlife on their properties and related those observations to attitude or actual yard management behavior. For future research, we suggest that researchers measure multiple determinants of yard management decisions and conduct experimental and longitudinal studies to improve our understanding of the feedback loops between people and wildlife in residential landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 105603"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204626000277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Residential yards and gardens provide a multitude of benefits for people, including green infrastructure, access to nature, and improved mental health. Yards can also benefit wildlife by providing habitat, food and other resources. Previous studies have shown that people manage their gardens in different ways to attract or deter wildlife and that visible wildlife diversity can increase people’s investment in nature and resource provisioning. These relationships between people and wildlife could form feedbacks with long-term consequences for biodiversity, but the way that various factors, including observations and perceived presence of wildlife in residential gardens, affect people’s management decisions remains largely unexplored. To understand how these relationships shape yard management decisions, we organized and synthesized existing international scientific literature on wildlife gardening, identified major gaps in current knowledge, and suggest directions for future research that could improve our understanding of the dynamic, potentially reciprocal relationships between residents, their gardening behaviors, and wildlife. We identified 53 relevant studies from North America, South America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia. Most studies employed a qualitative approach to examine how attitudes toward wildlife influenced gardening behavior, with other determinants of wildlife gardening relatively understudied in the context of this literature search. Only five studies directly asked residents about wildlife observations or perceived presence of wildlife on their properties and related those observations to attitude or actual yard management behavior. For future research, we suggest that researchers measure multiple determinants of yard management decisions and conduct experimental and longitudinal studies to improve our understanding of the feedback loops between people and wildlife in residential landscapes.
期刊介绍:
Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.