Bird feeders and rat traps: Understanding the relationships among psychosocial factors, wildlife observations, and yard management decisions

IF 9.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-23 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105603
Nikolas Ballut , Andrés M. Urcuqui-Bustamante , Emily Minor
{"title":"Bird feeders and rat traps: Understanding the relationships among psychosocial factors, wildlife observations, and yard management decisions","authors":"Nikolas Ballut ,&nbsp;Andrés M. Urcuqui-Bustamante ,&nbsp;Emily Minor","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residential yards and gardens provide a multitude of benefits for people, including green infrastructure, access to nature, and improved mental health. Yards can also benefit wildlife by providing habitat, food and other resources. Previous studies have shown that people manage their gardens in different ways to attract or deter wildlife and that visible wildlife diversity can increase people’s investment in nature and resource provisioning. These relationships between people and wildlife could form feedbacks with long-term consequences for biodiversity, but the way that various factors, including observations and perceived presence of wildlife in residential gardens, affect people’s management decisions remains largely unexplored. To understand how these relationships shape yard management decisions, we organized and synthesized existing international scientific literature on wildlife gardening, identified major gaps in current knowledge, and suggest directions for future research that could improve our understanding of the dynamic, potentially reciprocal relationships between residents, their gardening behaviors, and wildlife. We identified 53 relevant studies from North America, South America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia. Most studies employed a qualitative approach to examine how attitudes toward wildlife influenced gardening behavior, with other determinants of wildlife gardening relatively understudied in the context of this literature search. Only five studies directly asked residents about wildlife observations or perceived presence of wildlife on their properties and related those observations to attitude or actual yard management behavior. For future research, we suggest that researchers measure multiple determinants of yard management decisions and conduct experimental and longitudinal studies to improve our understanding of the feedback loops between people and wildlife in residential landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"270 ","pages":"Article 105603"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169204626000277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residential yards and gardens provide a multitude of benefits for people, including green infrastructure, access to nature, and improved mental health. Yards can also benefit wildlife by providing habitat, food and other resources. Previous studies have shown that people manage their gardens in different ways to attract or deter wildlife and that visible wildlife diversity can increase people’s investment in nature and resource provisioning. These relationships between people and wildlife could form feedbacks with long-term consequences for biodiversity, but the way that various factors, including observations and perceived presence of wildlife in residential gardens, affect people’s management decisions remains largely unexplored. To understand how these relationships shape yard management decisions, we organized and synthesized existing international scientific literature on wildlife gardening, identified major gaps in current knowledge, and suggest directions for future research that could improve our understanding of the dynamic, potentially reciprocal relationships between residents, their gardening behaviors, and wildlife. We identified 53 relevant studies from North America, South America, Europe, Oceania, Africa, and Asia. Most studies employed a qualitative approach to examine how attitudes toward wildlife influenced gardening behavior, with other determinants of wildlife gardening relatively understudied in the context of this literature search. Only five studies directly asked residents about wildlife observations or perceived presence of wildlife on their properties and related those observations to attitude or actual yard management behavior. For future research, we suggest that researchers measure multiple determinants of yard management decisions and conduct experimental and longitudinal studies to improve our understanding of the feedback loops between people and wildlife in residential landscapes.
喂鸟器和捕鼠器:了解社会心理因素、野生动物观察和庭院管理决策之间的关系
住宅庭院和花园为人们提供了许多好处,包括绿色基础设施、接近自然和改善心理健康。院子还可以为野生动物提供栖息地、食物和其他资源。以前的研究表明,人们以不同的方式管理他们的花园来吸引或阻止野生动物,可见的野生动物多样性可以增加人们对自然和资源供应的投资。人与野生动物之间的这些关系可能会形成对生物多样性产生长期影响的反馈,但各种因素,包括观察和感知到的住宅花园中野生动物的存在,影响人们管理决策的方式,在很大程度上仍未被探索。为了了解这些关系如何影响庭院管理决策,我们组织和综合了现有的国际野生动物园艺科学文献,确定了当前知识的主要空白,并为未来的研究方向提出了建议,以提高我们对居民、他们的园艺行为和野生动物之间动态的、潜在的互惠关系的理解。我们从北美、南美、欧洲、大洋洲、非洲和亚洲筛选了53项相关研究。大多数研究采用定性方法来研究对野生动物的态度如何影响园艺行为,而在本文献检索的背景下,对野生动物园艺的其他决定因素的研究相对不足。只有五项研究直接询问了居民对野生动物的观察或对其财产中野生动物的感知,并将这些观察与态度或实际的院子管理行为联系起来。对于未来的研究,我们建议研究人员测量庭院管理决策的多个决定因素,并进行实验和纵向研究,以提高我们对住宅景观中人与野生动物之间反馈循环的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Landscape and Urban Planning
Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书