Evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity impairment using resting-state BOLD MRI in symptomatic patients with unilateral intracranial artery occlusion

IF 2.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yi Shan , Ya-yan Yin , Bi-xiao Cui , Shao-zhen Yan , Yue Zhang , Bin Yang , Yan Ma , Jie Lu
{"title":"Evaluation of cerebrovascular reactivity impairment using resting-state BOLD MRI in symptomatic patients with unilateral intracranial artery occlusion","authors":"Yi Shan ,&nbsp;Ya-yan Yin ,&nbsp;Bi-xiao Cui ,&nbsp;Shao-zhen Yan ,&nbsp;Yue Zhang ,&nbsp;Bin Yang ,&nbsp;Yan Ma ,&nbsp;Jie Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.cccb.2026.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Cerebral vascular reactivity (CVR) is an independent predictor of poor prognosis for patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA)/internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. This study assessed CVR impairment using resting-state blood oxygenation level-dependent (RS BOLD) MRI in this population and aimed to identify feasible pre-surgical markers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study included 45 patients with symptomatic unilateral MCA/ICA occlusion and 20 healthy controls. Of these, 16 underwent extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass with follow-up MRI. RS BOLD data were collected using a 3.0 T PET/MR system. Voxel-wise CVR maps were computed with a general linear model, and the mean CVR in the MCA perfusion territory was calculated. Interhemispheric CVR asymmetry index (CVR-AI) was assessed. Group differences were analyzed, and ROC analysis was used to evaluate CVR's diagnostic performance. Pearson correlation was used to assess relationships between baseline CVR and post-surgical changes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Affected-side CVR was significantly lower compared to the contralateral side and controls (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Individual analysis showed significant differences in the proportions of decreased, normal, and increased CVR between the affected and contralateral sides (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001). CVR-AI showed high predictive efficiency for discriminating patients from controls (AUC = 0.762). Post-surgery, the affected-side CVR increased significantly, whereas CVR-AI decreased but remained higher than in controls (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Preoperative CVR-AI positively correlated with post-surgery affected-side CVR increase (<em>R</em> = 0.725) and CVR-AI decrease (<em>R</em> = 0.635).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study proposes CVR-AI as a novel imaging marker for pre-surgical evaluation in patients with unilateral intracranial arterial occlusion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72549,"journal":{"name":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100532"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266624502600005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Cerebral vascular reactivity (CVR) is an independent predictor of poor prognosis for patients with symptomatic middle cerebral artery (MCA)/internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion. This study assessed CVR impairment using resting-state blood oxygenation level-dependent (RS BOLD) MRI in this population and aimed to identify feasible pre-surgical markers.

Methods

The study included 45 patients with symptomatic unilateral MCA/ICA occlusion and 20 healthy controls. Of these, 16 underwent extracranial-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass with follow-up MRI. RS BOLD data were collected using a 3.0 T PET/MR system. Voxel-wise CVR maps were computed with a general linear model, and the mean CVR in the MCA perfusion territory was calculated. Interhemispheric CVR asymmetry index (CVR-AI) was assessed. Group differences were analyzed, and ROC analysis was used to evaluate CVR's diagnostic performance. Pearson correlation was used to assess relationships between baseline CVR and post-surgical changes.

Results

Affected-side CVR was significantly lower compared to the contralateral side and controls (P < 0.01). Individual analysis showed significant differences in the proportions of decreased, normal, and increased CVR between the affected and contralateral sides (P < 0.0001). CVR-AI showed high predictive efficiency for discriminating patients from controls (AUC = 0.762). Post-surgery, the affected-side CVR increased significantly, whereas CVR-AI decreased but remained higher than in controls (P < 0.05). Preoperative CVR-AI positively correlated with post-surgery affected-side CVR increase (R = 0.725) and CVR-AI decrease (R = 0.635).

Conclusion

This study proposes CVR-AI as a novel imaging marker for pre-surgical evaluation in patients with unilateral intracranial arterial occlusion.
单侧颅内动脉闭塞患者静息状态BOLD MRI评价脑血管反应性损伤。
目的:脑血管反应性(CVR)是症状性大脑中动脉(MCA)/颈内动脉(ICA)闭塞患者预后不良的独立预测因子。本研究使用静息状态血氧水平依赖(RS BOLD) MRI评估该人群的CVR损伤,旨在确定可行的术前标记。方法:研究对象为45例单侧MCA/ICA闭塞患者和20例健康对照。其中16例行颅外-颅内(EC-IC)旁路手术,随访MRI。RS BOLD数据采用3.0 T PET/MR系统采集。使用一般线性模型计算逐体素CVR图,并计算MCA灌注区域的平均CVR。评估CVR半球间不对称指数(CVR- ai)。分析组间差异,采用ROC分析评价CVR的诊断效能。Pearson相关性用于评估基线CVR与术后变化之间的关系。结果:患侧CVR明显低于对侧及对照组(P < 0.01)。个体分析显示,患侧和对侧CVR下降、正常和增加的比例有显著差异(P < 0.0001)。CVR-AI在区分患者和对照组方面显示出较高的预测效率(AUC = 0.762)。术后患侧CVR显著升高,CVR- ai降低,但仍高于对照组(P < 0.05)。术前CVR- ai与术后患侧CVR升高(R = 0.725)、CVR- ai降低(R = 0.635)呈正相关。结论:本研究提出CVR-AI可作为单侧颅内动脉闭塞患者术前评估的一种新型影像学指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior
Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior Neurology, Clinical Neurology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书