A systematic review on dysconnectivity in face and emotion processing networks in schizophrenia.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Amritha Harikumar, Junqiang Dai, Elaine F Walker, Vince D Calhoun
{"title":"A systematic review on dysconnectivity in face and emotion processing networks in schizophrenia.","authors":"Amritha Harikumar, Junqiang Dai, Elaine F Walker, Vince D Calhoun","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01391-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder that affects approximately 20 million people worldwide. Patients show face-processing deficits that significantly affect their social interactions and social cognitive abilities (e.g., recognizing human faces). Although face processing has been extensively studied by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), there have been very few systematic reviews investigating links between social-cognitive dysfunction, face processing networks, and clinical symptoms associated with key large-scale brain networks, such as the triple networks. We review brain networks, their dysconnectivity across patient subtypes, and relationships to clinical symptoms. Reviewed studies from 2020-2025 were 1) written in English, 2) focused on face and/or emotion processing in schizophrenia (not limited to first episode psychosis [FEP]), and 3) were resting or task-based fMRI studies investigating neural networks subserving face/emotion processing. PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were utilized. Nine articles were reviewed. Resting-state studies and task-based fMRI studies showed elevated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive scores in FEP patients coupled with social cognition deficits. Dysconnectivity was most consistently observed in the executive function network, the ToM /mentalizing network, the default mode network, limbic regions, and the visual-perceptual systems. Subtype dysconnectivity patterns included broad deficits in social cognition, empathy, emotion processing and face/emotion recognition. Social-cognitive deficits broadly stem from challenges in recognizing and processing negative emotional faces. Factors, such as trauma, suicidality, and inflammation, should be further examined, along with subtype presentations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1913-1927"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01391-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Schizophrenia is a complex psychiatric disorder that affects approximately 20 million people worldwide. Patients show face-processing deficits that significantly affect their social interactions and social cognitive abilities (e.g., recognizing human faces). Although face processing has been extensively studied by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), there have been very few systematic reviews investigating links between social-cognitive dysfunction, face processing networks, and clinical symptoms associated with key large-scale brain networks, such as the triple networks. We review brain networks, their dysconnectivity across patient subtypes, and relationships to clinical symptoms. Reviewed studies from 2020-2025 were 1) written in English, 2) focused on face and/or emotion processing in schizophrenia (not limited to first episode psychosis [FEP]), and 3) were resting or task-based fMRI studies investigating neural networks subserving face/emotion processing. PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were utilized. Nine articles were reviewed. Resting-state studies and task-based fMRI studies showed elevated Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) positive scores in FEP patients coupled with social cognition deficits. Dysconnectivity was most consistently observed in the executive function network, the ToM /mentalizing network, the default mode network, limbic regions, and the visual-perceptual systems. Subtype dysconnectivity patterns included broad deficits in social cognition, empathy, emotion processing and face/emotion recognition. Social-cognitive deficits broadly stem from challenges in recognizing and processing negative emotional faces. Factors, such as trauma, suicidality, and inflammation, should be further examined, along with subtype presentations.

精神分裂症患者面部和情绪处理网络连通性障碍的系统综述。
精神分裂症是一种复杂的精神疾病,影响着全世界大约2000万人。患者表现出显著影响其社会交往和社会认知能力(如识别人脸)的面部处理缺陷。虽然人脸处理已经通过功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)进行了广泛的研究,但很少有系统的综述调查社会认知功能障碍、人脸处理网络和与关键的大规模大脑网络(如三重网络)相关的临床症状之间的联系。我们回顾了大脑网络,它们在患者亚型中的连接障碍,以及与临床症状的关系。回顾2020-2025年的研究:1)以英文撰写,2)专注于精神分裂症的面部和/或情绪处理(不限于首发精神病[FEP]),以及3)静息或基于任务的fMRI研究,研究支持面部/情绪处理的神经网络。使用PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar。对9篇文章进行了综述。静息状态研究和基于任务的功能磁共振成像研究显示,FEP患者伴有社会认知缺陷的阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)阳性评分升高。在执行功能网络、ToM /心智化网络、默认模式网络、边缘区域和视觉感知系统中观察到的连通性障碍最为一致。亚型连接障碍模式包括社会认知、共情、情绪处理和面部/情绪识别的广泛缺陷。社会认知缺陷通常源于识别和处理负面情绪面孔的挑战。创伤、自杀倾向和炎症等因素应与亚型表现一起进一步检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书