Exploring the Investment Construct for Quantifying AI Utilization.

IF 3.6 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Human Factors Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-24 DOI:10.1177/00187208261421986
Ulubilge Ulusoy, Garrett E Reisman
{"title":"Exploring the Investment Construct for Quantifying AI Utilization.","authors":"Ulubilge Ulusoy, Garrett E Reisman","doi":"10.1177/00187208261421986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveWe explored the <i>Investment</i> construct to quantify human utilization of AI and examined respect, trust, workload, and self-confidence as factors influencing utilization within the <i>Investment</i> Framework.BackgroundThe <i>Investment</i> construct is a new approach proposed to quantify human utilization of AI-enabled agents based on the measurable opportunity costs incurred by humans. An experimental study was conducted to operationalize the construct and examine its relationships with influencing factors.MethodThirty participants performed a maintenance task while an AI assisted them. Participants were split into three groups with different allocated completion times to simulate different task-load levels, under the assumption that a lower task load would lead to higher <i>Investment</i>. We collected typing data as the objective measure of <i>Investment</i>, and responses to a six-item custom scale as the subjective measure. Additionally, we collected data for the influencing factors listed above.ResultsThere was a significant difference between groups in terms of both <i>Investment</i> measures, and <i>Investment</i> was higher with a lower task load, as expected. Furthermore, these two <i>Investment</i> measures correlated. We also revealed a correlation between respect and the subjective measure of <i>Investment</i>. No other significant correlations were revealed.ConclusionThis study presents the first empirical evidence of AI utilization conceptualized through incurred opportunity costs within the <i>Investment</i> Framework, explored using two independent measures and influencing factors.ApplicationThe <i>Investment</i> Framework can guide the design of effective human AI interaction by helping to balance human effort and AI benefit, prevent underutilization, and enhance both team performance and AI improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":56333,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors","volume":" ","pages":"757-787"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208261421986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveWe explored the Investment construct to quantify human utilization of AI and examined respect, trust, workload, and self-confidence as factors influencing utilization within the Investment Framework.BackgroundThe Investment construct is a new approach proposed to quantify human utilization of AI-enabled agents based on the measurable opportunity costs incurred by humans. An experimental study was conducted to operationalize the construct and examine its relationships with influencing factors.MethodThirty participants performed a maintenance task while an AI assisted them. Participants were split into three groups with different allocated completion times to simulate different task-load levels, under the assumption that a lower task load would lead to higher Investment. We collected typing data as the objective measure of Investment, and responses to a six-item custom scale as the subjective measure. Additionally, we collected data for the influencing factors listed above.ResultsThere was a significant difference between groups in terms of both Investment measures, and Investment was higher with a lower task load, as expected. Furthermore, these two Investment measures correlated. We also revealed a correlation between respect and the subjective measure of Investment. No other significant correlations were revealed.ConclusionThis study presents the first empirical evidence of AI utilization conceptualized through incurred opportunity costs within the Investment Framework, explored using two independent measures and influencing factors.ApplicationThe Investment Framework can guide the design of effective human AI interaction by helping to balance human effort and AI benefit, prevent underutilization, and enhance both team performance and AI improvement.

探索量化人工智能利用的投资结构。
目的:我们探索了投资结构来量化人类对人工智能的利用,并在投资框架内考察了尊重、信任、工作量和自信作为影响人工智能利用的因素。投资结构是一种基于人类产生的可衡量的机会成本来量化人类对人工智能代理的利用的新方法。本研究以实验方法验证该建构的可操作性,并探讨其与影响因素的关系。方法30名参与者在人工智能辅助下进行维护任务。参与者被分成三组,分配不同的完成时间来模拟不同的任务负荷水平,假设较低的任务负荷会导致较高的投资。我们收集了打字数据作为投资的客观衡量标准,并收集了对六项自定义量表的回应作为主观衡量标准。此外,我们收集了上述影响因素的数据。结果两组之间在两项投资指标上存在显著差异,正如预期的那样,投资越高,任务负荷越低。此外,这两项投资指标具有相关性。我们还揭示了尊重与投资的主观衡量之间的相关性。未发现其他显著相关性。本研究首次提出了人工智能利用在投资框架下通过发生的机会成本概念化的经验证据,并使用两个独立的度量和影响因素进行了探讨。应用投资框架可以通过帮助平衡人的努力和人工智能的利益,防止利用不足,提高团队绩效和人工智能的改进来指导有效的人与人工智能交互的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Factors
Human Factors 管理科学-行为科学
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society publishes peer-reviewed scientific studies in human factors/ergonomics that present theoretical and practical advances concerning the relationship between people and technologies, tools, environments, and systems. Papers published in Human Factors leverage fundamental knowledge of human capabilities and limitations – and the basic understanding of cognitive, physical, behavioral, physiological, social, developmental, affective, and motivational aspects of human performance – to yield design principles; enhance training, selection, and communication; and ultimately improve human-system interfaces and sociotechnical systems that lead to safer and more effective outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书