Juliette Archambeau, Marta Benito Garzón, Marina de Miguel, Alexandre Changenet, Francesca Bagnoli, Frédéric Barraquand, Maurizio Marchi, Giovanni G Vendramin, Stephen Cavers, Annika Perry, Santiago C González-Martínez
{"title":"Evaluating Genomic Offset Predictions in a Forest Tree with High Population Genetic Structure.","authors":"Juliette Archambeau, Marta Benito Garzón, Marina de Miguel, Alexandre Changenet, Francesca Bagnoli, Frédéric Barraquand, Maurizio Marchi, Giovanni G Vendramin, Stephen Cavers, Annika Perry, Santiago C González-Martínez","doi":"10.1086/739045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractGenomic offset models are increasingly popular tools for identifying populations at risk of maladaptation under climate change. These models estimate the extent of genetic change required for populations to remain adapted under future climate change scenarios but face strong limitations and still lack broad empirical testing. Using 9,817 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 454 trees from 34 populations of maritime pine, a species with a marked population genetic structure, we found substantial variability across genomic offset predictions from different methods, SNP sets, and general circulation models. Using five common gardens, we mostly found positive associations between genomic offset predictions and mortality, as expected. However, contrary to our expectations, we observed very few negative monotonic associations between genomic offset predictions and height. Higher mortality rates were also observed in national forest inventory plots with high genomic offset, but only for some methods and SNP sets. The differing genomic offset patterns produced by the best-validated methods across the maritime pine range hindered drawing definitive conclusions for the species. Our study demonstrates the imperative of employing different methods and validating genomic offset predictions with independent data sources before using them as reliable metrics to inform conservation or management.</p>","PeriodicalId":50800,"journal":{"name":"American Naturalist","volume":"207 3","pages":"389-414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Naturalist","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/739045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractGenomic offset models are increasingly popular tools for identifying populations at risk of maladaptation under climate change. These models estimate the extent of genetic change required for populations to remain adapted under future climate change scenarios but face strong limitations and still lack broad empirical testing. Using 9,817 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 454 trees from 34 populations of maritime pine, a species with a marked population genetic structure, we found substantial variability across genomic offset predictions from different methods, SNP sets, and general circulation models. Using five common gardens, we mostly found positive associations between genomic offset predictions and mortality, as expected. However, contrary to our expectations, we observed very few negative monotonic associations between genomic offset predictions and height. Higher mortality rates were also observed in national forest inventory plots with high genomic offset, but only for some methods and SNP sets. The differing genomic offset patterns produced by the best-validated methods across the maritime pine range hindered drawing definitive conclusions for the species. Our study demonstrates the imperative of employing different methods and validating genomic offset predictions with independent data sources before using them as reliable metrics to inform conservation or management.
期刊介绍:
Since its inception in 1867, The American Naturalist has maintained its position as one of the world''s premier peer-reviewed publications in ecology, evolution, and behavior research. Its goals are to publish articles that are of broad interest to the readership, pose new and significant problems, introduce novel subjects, develop conceptual unification, and change the way people think. AmNat emphasizes sophisticated methodologies and innovative theoretical syntheses—all in an effort to advance the knowledge of organic evolution and other broad biological principles.