Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Quantitative Study on How Councils are Used and Predictors of Effective Councils.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2026-02-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735261415786
Barbara Lewis, Chris Cochran, Stowe Shoemaker, Neeraj Bhandari, Soumya Upadhyay, Erika Marquez
{"title":"Hospital Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Quantitative Study on How Councils are Used and Predictors of Effective Councils.","authors":"Barbara Lewis, Chris Cochran, Stowe Shoemaker, Neeraj Bhandari, Soumya Upadhyay, Erika Marquez","doi":"10.1177/23743735261415786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) are a key strategy in advancing patient-centeredness, heralded by the Institute of Medicine as a goal to improve healthcare quality. Although PFACs have been around since the 1980s, they exist in only 54% of US hospitals, according to the American Hospital Association's annual survey of 6100 hospitals. This research aimed to identify key predictors of PFAC effectiveness, since previous studies had lacked descriptions of these factors. Using the C-OAR-SE theory, this quantitative, validated survey of 60 questions was answered by 203 respondents who worked or had worked with PFACs in US hospitals. The results revealed that leadership support was significantly associated with increased meeting content, stronger measurement practices, and more frequent decision-making and involvement with policies and procedures. PFACs, focused on conditions or patient types rather than general PFACs, scored higher on multiple factors, including meeting content, measurement practices, level of engagement, and coaching and training members. This study highlights the key drivers of effective operations and reinforces the value of patient-centeredness in integrating the patient and family voice into hospital initiatives through PFACs.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"13 ","pages":"23743735261415786"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12924927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735261415786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) are a key strategy in advancing patient-centeredness, heralded by the Institute of Medicine as a goal to improve healthcare quality. Although PFACs have been around since the 1980s, they exist in only 54% of US hospitals, according to the American Hospital Association's annual survey of 6100 hospitals. This research aimed to identify key predictors of PFAC effectiveness, since previous studies had lacked descriptions of these factors. Using the C-OAR-SE theory, this quantitative, validated survey of 60 questions was answered by 203 respondents who worked or had worked with PFACs in US hospitals. The results revealed that leadership support was significantly associated with increased meeting content, stronger measurement practices, and more frequent decision-making and involvement with policies and procedures. PFACs, focused on conditions or patient types rather than general PFACs, scored higher on multiple factors, including meeting content, measurement practices, level of engagement, and coaching and training members. This study highlights the key drivers of effective operations and reinforces the value of patient-centeredness in integrating the patient and family voice into hospital initiatives through PFACs.

医院病人和家属咨询委员会:关于如何使用委员会和有效委员会的预测因素的定量研究。
患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs)是推进以患者为中心的关键策略,医学研究所(Institute of Medicine)将其作为提高医疗保健质量的目标。美国医院协会对6100家医院的年度调查显示,尽管PFACs早在上世纪80年代就已经存在,但只有54%的美国医院有PFACs。由于以往的研究缺乏对这些因素的描述,本研究旨在确定PFAC有效性的关键预测因素。使用C-OAR-SE理论,这项定量的、有效的调查共有60个问题,由203名在美国医院工作或曾与PFACs一起工作的受访者回答。结果显示,领导支持与增加的会议内容、更强的测量实践、更频繁的决策和参与政策和程序显著相关。PFACs侧重于病情或患者类型,而不是一般的PFACs,在多个因素上得分更高,包括会议内容、测量实践、参与水平、指导和培训成员。本研究强调了有效操作的关键驱动因素,并加强了以患者为中心的价值,通过PFACs将患者和家庭的声音整合到医院的举措中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书