Relationship between aesthetic preference and 'complexity' mediated crossmodal correspondence of shape and tone sequence.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
I-Perception Pub Date : 2026-02-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20416695261420290
Kohei Osugi, Jumpei Hayashi, Takeo Kato, Hideyoshi Yanagisawa
{"title":"Relationship between aesthetic preference and 'complexity' mediated crossmodal correspondence of shape and tone sequence.","authors":"Kohei Osugi, Jumpei Hayashi, Takeo Kato, Hideyoshi Yanagisawa","doi":"10.1177/20416695261420290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conventional studies indicate that the strength of crossmodal correspondence, which represents the connection between multiple senses and actual human perception, may influence pleasant or unpleasant emotions in some combinations of sensory modality and stimulus type. In this study, sensory evaluation experiments were conducted to evaluate the crossmodal correspondence between visual and auditory sense mediated by 'complexity' using closed curve shapes and tone sequences generated based on curvature entropy and tone entropy. The relationship between the sensory evaluation values of the 'aesthetic preferences' of the shape/tone sequence combinations and the weakness of crossmodal correspondence, that is, the difference of curvature and tone entropy, was fitted to the Wundt curve, one of the models of pleasant emotion. As a result, a strong correlation (0.64) was confirmed between the two. Bias due to the musician's experience was confirmed in the sensory evaluation values of some tone sequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":47194,"journal":{"name":"I-Perception","volume":"17 1","pages":"20416695261420290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12925017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I-Perception","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20416695261420290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional studies indicate that the strength of crossmodal correspondence, which represents the connection between multiple senses and actual human perception, may influence pleasant or unpleasant emotions in some combinations of sensory modality and stimulus type. In this study, sensory evaluation experiments were conducted to evaluate the crossmodal correspondence between visual and auditory sense mediated by 'complexity' using closed curve shapes and tone sequences generated based on curvature entropy and tone entropy. The relationship between the sensory evaluation values of the 'aesthetic preferences' of the shape/tone sequence combinations and the weakness of crossmodal correspondence, that is, the difference of curvature and tone entropy, was fitted to the Wundt curve, one of the models of pleasant emotion. As a result, a strong correlation (0.64) was confirmed between the two. Bias due to the musician's experience was confirmed in the sensory evaluation values of some tone sequences.

审美偏好与“复杂性”介导的形状和音调序列的跨模对应关系。
传统研究表明,在某些感觉模态和刺激类型的组合中,跨模态对应的强度可能会影响愉快或不愉快的情绪,而跨模态对应代表了多种感觉与人类实际感知之间的联系。在本研究中,感官评价实验利用闭合曲线形状和基于曲率熵和音调熵生成的音调序列,评估了“复杂性”介导的视觉和听觉之间的跨模态对应关系。将形/音序列组合的“审美偏好”感官评价值与跨模态对应的弱点即曲率和音熵之差之间的关系拟合到愉悦情绪模型之一的Wundt曲线上。结果证实两者之间存在强相关(0.64)。由于音乐家的经验的偏见在一些音调序列的感官评价值中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
I-Perception
I-Perception PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书