Daniel M Handzel, Walter Sekundo, Chiraz Ben Abdallah, Markus S Ladewig
{"title":"Intracameral pressure during capsulorhexis in cataract surgery using cohesive versus dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical devices: a randomised trial.","authors":"Daniel M Handzel, Walter Sekundo, Chiraz Ben Abdallah, Markus S Ladewig","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo study the properties of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) with respect to their ability to create and maintain high intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) by comparing the drop in IOP before and after creation of the CCC.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>The study included 174 eyes in four groups using two different OVDs (hyaluronic acid (HA) and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)) and two different instruments (utrata forceps (UF) and 26G cystotome (RN)). IOP was measured using rebound tonometry with sterilised probes immediately before the beginning of the CCC and immediately afterwards during cataract surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The drop in IOP during capsulorhexis was measured at 52.1±10.7 mm Hg with the combination HA/RN, 62.4±11.5 mm Hg with HA/UF, 60.5±10.0 mm Hg with HPMC/RN and 68.7±14.1 mm Hg with HPMC/UF. The variance in IOP reduction between HA and HPMC did not reach statistical significance (p=0.100).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of a noticeable difference in IOP levels, despite the use of different OVDs with unique properties, indicates that IOP may not be the main factor influencing the notable differences in tactile feedback perceived by surgeons during capsulorhexis procedures conducted with varying OVDs. To elucidate these sensations, additional characteristics such as viscosity, elasticity, pseudoplasticity and cohesion will have to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12931536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ObjectiveTo study the properties of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) with respect to their ability to create and maintain high intraocular pressure (IOP) during the creation of a continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) by comparing the drop in IOP before and after creation of the CCC.
Methods and analysis: The study included 174 eyes in four groups using two different OVDs (hyaluronic acid (HA) and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC)) and two different instruments (utrata forceps (UF) and 26G cystotome (RN)). IOP was measured using rebound tonometry with sterilised probes immediately before the beginning of the CCC and immediately afterwards during cataract surgery.
Results: The drop in IOP during capsulorhexis was measured at 52.1±10.7 mm Hg with the combination HA/RN, 62.4±11.5 mm Hg with HA/UF, 60.5±10.0 mm Hg with HPMC/RN and 68.7±14.1 mm Hg with HPMC/UF. The variance in IOP reduction between HA and HPMC did not reach statistical significance (p=0.100).
Conclusion: The lack of a noticeable difference in IOP levels, despite the use of different OVDs with unique properties, indicates that IOP may not be the main factor influencing the notable differences in tactile feedback perceived by surgeons during capsulorhexis procedures conducted with varying OVDs. To elucidate these sensations, additional characteristics such as viscosity, elasticity, pseudoplasticity and cohesion will have to be explored.
目的通过比较连续曲线撕囊术(CCC)形成前后眼压的下降情况,研究不同眼粘手术器械(ovd)在形成连续曲线撕囊术(CCC)过程中产生和维持高眼压的能力。方法与分析:采用两种不同的ovd(透明质酸(HA)和羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPMC))和两种不同的器械(子宫钳(UF)和26G膀胱切片仪(RN)),共4组174只眼。在白内障手术开始前和手术结束后立即用消毒探头测眼压。结果:在撕囊过程中,HA/RN联合治疗的IOP下降为52.1±10.7 mm Hg, HA/UF联合治疗为62.4±11.5 mm Hg, HPMC/RN联合治疗为60.5±10.0 mm Hg, HPMC/UF联合治疗为68.7±14.1 mm Hg。HA与HPMC的IOP降低差异无统计学意义(p=0.100)。结论:尽管使用具有独特性能的不同ovd,但IOP水平没有明显差异,这表明IOP可能不是影响不同ovd进行撕囊手术时外科医生感知到的触觉反馈显着差异的主要因素。为了阐明这些感觉,必须探索诸如粘度、弹性、假塑性和内聚等附加特性。