Burnout, compassion satisfaction and fatigue: Is professional quality of life linked with resilience in emergency departments?

Busra Bildik, Seref Emre Atis, Bora Cekmen
{"title":"Burnout, compassion satisfaction and fatigue: Is professional quality of life linked with resilience in emergency departments?","authors":"Busra Bildik, Seref Emre Atis, Bora Cekmen","doi":"10.25259/NMJI_423_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background We examined the relationship between resilience and professional quality of life (ProQoL) through specifically developed surveys and identified the correlation with sociodemographic characteristics that may affect both concepts. Methods The study was done among physicians working in different emergency departments. An online questionnaire with 3 parts was used. (i) 10 questions on the demographic characteristics and working conditions of the participating physicians; (ii) The 'Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale' (CDRS), a 10-item scale, which measures the psychological resilience of physicians; and (iii) The 'Professional Quality of Life Scale' (ProQoL scale) a 30-item questionnaire which measures physicians' compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO) and compassion fatigue (CF). Scores for the subscales of ProQoL were categorized as follows: <22 low; 23-41 moderate; and >42 high levels. Results The questionnaire was completed by 290 participants (99.3%). The median age was 30 (26-37) years, and 40.7% (118) of the participants were females. For the BO subscale, the median CDRS score of participants with high BO scores (18 [15-20]) was found to be lower than the median score of participants with low and moderate BO scores (p values 0.013 and 0.009, respectively). For CS subscale, the median scores of all 3 groups were statistically different, and the highest median score belonged to the high group (29 [27-34]) (p<0.001 for all 3 groups). For the CF subscale, the median CDRS score for participants with high CF scores (13 [9-16]) was found to be significantly lower than the CDRS score of participants with low and moderate CF scores (p <0.017 and <0.032, respectively). The median CDRS score of men was significantly higher than that of women (p<0.001). Conclusion The concept of resilience is associated with BO, CS and CF, which constitute ProQoL. Physicians who have high scores for BO and CF, which are negative sub-factors of the ProQoL scale, have lower resilience; on the contrary, those who have high scores for CS, which is a positive indicator of the quality of life, have higher resilience. Female gender can be considered a risk factor for low resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":519891,"journal":{"name":"The National medical journal of India","volume":"39 2","pages":"82-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The National medical journal of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/NMJI_423_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background We examined the relationship between resilience and professional quality of life (ProQoL) through specifically developed surveys and identified the correlation with sociodemographic characteristics that may affect both concepts. Methods The study was done among physicians working in different emergency departments. An online questionnaire with 3 parts was used. (i) 10 questions on the demographic characteristics and working conditions of the participating physicians; (ii) The 'Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale' (CDRS), a 10-item scale, which measures the psychological resilience of physicians; and (iii) The 'Professional Quality of Life Scale' (ProQoL scale) a 30-item questionnaire which measures physicians' compassion satisfaction (CS), burnout (BO) and compassion fatigue (CF). Scores for the subscales of ProQoL were categorized as follows: <22 low; 23-41 moderate; and >42 high levels. Results The questionnaire was completed by 290 participants (99.3%). The median age was 30 (26-37) years, and 40.7% (118) of the participants were females. For the BO subscale, the median CDRS score of participants with high BO scores (18 [15-20]) was found to be lower than the median score of participants with low and moderate BO scores (p values 0.013 and 0.009, respectively). For CS subscale, the median scores of all 3 groups were statistically different, and the highest median score belonged to the high group (29 [27-34]) (p<0.001 for all 3 groups). For the CF subscale, the median CDRS score for participants with high CF scores (13 [9-16]) was found to be significantly lower than the CDRS score of participants with low and moderate CF scores (p <0.017 and <0.032, respectively). The median CDRS score of men was significantly higher than that of women (p<0.001). Conclusion The concept of resilience is associated with BO, CS and CF, which constitute ProQoL. Physicians who have high scores for BO and CF, which are negative sub-factors of the ProQoL scale, have lower resilience; on the contrary, those who have high scores for CS, which is a positive indicator of the quality of life, have higher resilience. Female gender can be considered a risk factor for low resilience.

职业倦怠、同情满意度和疲劳:急诊科的职业生活质量与恢复力有关吗?
我们通过专门开发的调查研究了弹性和职业生活质量(ProQoL)之间的关系,并确定了可能影响这两个概念的社会人口统计学特征的相关性。方法对不同急诊科的内科医生进行调查。采用了一份包含三部分的在线调查问卷。(i)关于参与医生的人口特征和工作条件的10个问题;(ii)“康诺-戴维森心理弹性量表”(CDRS),一个包含10个项目的量表,用于测量医生的心理弹性;(3)“职业生活质量量表”(ProQoL量表)是一份包含30个项目的问卷,用于测量医生的同情满意度(CS)、倦怠(BO)和同情疲劳(CF)。ProQoL各分量表得分分为:42个高水平。结果共290人(99.3%)完成问卷调查。中位年龄为30(26-37)岁,女性占40.7%(118)。在BO分量表中,BO得分高的被试(18[15-20])的CDRS中位数得分低于BO得分低和中等的被试(p值分别为0.013和0.009)。在CS分量表中,三组的中位数得分均有统计学差异,中位数得分最高的为高组(29 [27-34])(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书