Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.

IF 0.7 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s13193-025-02337-1
Ravi Shankar Biswas, Sulagna Das, Dipankar Ray, Shaunli Konar, Dilip Kumar, Md Basir Ahmed
{"title":"Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Interim Results from a Randomized Trial.","authors":"Ravi Shankar Biswas, Sulagna Das, Dipankar Ray, Shaunli Konar, Dilip Kumar, Md Basir Ahmed","doi":"10.1007/s13193-025-02337-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses a significant treatment challenge, as conventional chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) frequently results in poor rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and distant metastasis. Total neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery may have the potential to improve overall outcomes and are coming onto clinical practice. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TNT (Arm A) versus conventional CRT (Arm-B) in achieving pCR and distant metastasis in both the arms. It is an open-labelled randomized controlled trial. Total 172 patients were enrolled in the trial having histologically confirmed LARC (stages T3-T4 or any T stage with lymph node involvement) from June 2021 to June 2023. Patients were randomized to either Arm-A (<i>n</i> = 87) or Arm-B (<i>n</i> = 85). This interim analysis was conducted after two-thirds of the target sample had completed 1-year follow-up. The patients in the Arm A received preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine followed by three cycles of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) while those on Arm B received radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine only followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant CapOx. The primary objective was pCR, being no residual tumor cells (ypT0N0) in the resection specimen. Secondary endpoints were tumor regression score (TRG), circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity, radicality of the resection margin, local recurrence and distant metastasis, and safety profile. In the interim analysis, which included 150 patients with 75 in each group, pCR was observed in 16.2% of Arm A and 17.4% of Arm-B (<i>p</i> > 0.05). There was no difference in tumor regression scores between the groups. Nonetheless, the TNT group significantly suffered less with distant metastasis at 1 year (6 vs.16 cases; <i>p</i> = 0.040). Local recurrence, CRM positive, or resection margin status did not show any relative difference. There were no significant adverse effects reported in both groups, and toxicity was moderate. This interim analysis suggests that while pCR is comparable in both the groups, TNT may offer superior systemic control by reducing distant metastasis. The findings also suggests the potential of TNT as a preferred treatment strategy in patients with LARC, though completion of the study and a long term follow-up is required to confirm its benefits. Clinical Trials Registry of India: CTRI/2021/05/033642.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"17 2","pages":"387-397"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12920856/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-025-02337-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) poses a significant treatment challenge, as conventional chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) frequently results in poor rates of pathological complete response (pCR) and distant metastasis. Total neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery may have the potential to improve overall outcomes and are coming onto clinical practice. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TNT (Arm A) versus conventional CRT (Arm-B) in achieving pCR and distant metastasis in both the arms. It is an open-labelled randomized controlled trial. Total 172 patients were enrolled in the trial having histologically confirmed LARC (stages T3-T4 or any T stage with lymph node involvement) from June 2021 to June 2023. Patients were randomized to either Arm-A (n = 87) or Arm-B (n = 85). This interim analysis was conducted after two-thirds of the target sample had completed 1-year follow-up. The patients in the Arm A received preoperative radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine followed by three cycles of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapOx) while those on Arm B received radiotherapy with concurrent capecitabine only followed by 6 cycles of adjuvant CapOx. The primary objective was pCR, being no residual tumor cells (ypT0N0) in the resection specimen. Secondary endpoints were tumor regression score (TRG), circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity, radicality of the resection margin, local recurrence and distant metastasis, and safety profile. In the interim analysis, which included 150 patients with 75 in each group, pCR was observed in 16.2% of Arm A and 17.4% of Arm-B (p > 0.05). There was no difference in tumor regression scores between the groups. Nonetheless, the TNT group significantly suffered less with distant metastasis at 1 year (6 vs.16 cases; p = 0.040). Local recurrence, CRM positive, or resection margin status did not show any relative difference. There were no significant adverse effects reported in both groups, and toxicity was moderate. This interim analysis suggests that while pCR is comparable in both the groups, TNT may offer superior systemic control by reducing distant metastasis. The findings also suggests the potential of TNT as a preferred treatment strategy in patients with LARC, though completion of the study and a long term follow-up is required to confirm its benefits. Clinical Trials Registry of India: CTRI/2021/05/033642.

局部晚期直肠癌的新辅助治疗:一项随机试验的中期结果。
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的治疗面临着巨大的挑战,因为传统的化疗(CRT)经常导致病理完全缓解(pCR)率低和远处转移。手术后的全新辅助化疗可能有改善总体结果的潜力,并正在进入临床实践。本研究旨在比较TNT (A组)与传统CRT (b组)在两组中实现pCR和远处转移的疗效和安全性。这是一项开放标签随机对照试验。从2021年6月至2023年6月,共有172名组织学证实的LARC (T3-T4期或任何伴有淋巴结受累的T期)患者入组试验。患者被随机分配到a组(n = 87)或b组(n = 85)。这项中期分析是在三分之二的目标样本完成1年随访后进行的。A组患者术前接受卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(CapOx) 3个周期的放疗,而B组患者仅接受卡培他滨联合奥沙利铂(CapOx) 6个周期的放疗。主要目的是pCR,切除标本中没有残留的肿瘤细胞(ypT0N0)。次要终点是肿瘤消退评分(TRG)、环切缘(CRM)阳性、切缘根治性、局部复发和远处转移以及安全性。在中期分析中,150例患者,每组75例,A组16.2%,b组17.4%观察到pCR (p < 0.05)。两组间肿瘤消退评分无差异。尽管如此,TNT组在1年后发生远处转移的情况明显减少(6例对16例;p = 0.040)。局部复发、CRM阳性或切除边缘状态没有任何相对差异。两组均无明显不良反应,毒性适中。这一中期分析表明,虽然pCR在两组中具有可比性,但TNT可能通过减少远处转移提供更好的全身控制。研究结果还表明,TNT作为LARC患者的首选治疗策略的潜力,尽管需要完成研究和长期随访来证实其益处。印度临床试验注册中心:CTRI/2021/05/033642。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书