Long-Term Care Providers' Perspectives on Health Information Exchange During Patient Transitions Into Long-Term Care: A Multiple Case Study.

IF 2.4 Q3 Medicine
Healthcare Management Forum Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-22 DOI:10.1177/08404704261426444
Augustine Chukwuebuka Okoh, Aimun Shah, Christine Lin, Paranshi Gupta, Naisha Dharia, Caroline Caswell, Henry Yu-Hin Siu, Michelle Howard, Amit Arya, Holly Odoardi, Brian McKenna, Keya Shah, Sarah Wojkowski, Lawrence Grierson
{"title":"Long-Term Care Providers' Perspectives on Health Information Exchange During Patient Transitions Into Long-Term Care: A Multiple Case Study.","authors":"Augustine Chukwuebuka Okoh, Aimun Shah, Christine Lin, Paranshi Gupta, Naisha Dharia, Caroline Caswell, Henry Yu-Hin Siu, Michelle Howard, Amit Arya, Holly Odoardi, Brian McKenna, Keya Shah, Sarah Wojkowski, Lawrence Grierson","doi":"10.1177/08404704261426444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This multiple case study explored how Long-Term Care (LTC) teams in Ontario, Canada, manage informational continuity when older adults transition from community-based care to LTC. Five LTC homes, varying in size and rurality, participated, with 20 professionals interviewed across various roles, including nursing, medicine, rehabilitation, and administration. LTC providers emphasized the importance of comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date biopsychosocial information to support effective care. However, information transferred from community and hospital sources was often incomplete or outdated. To address gaps, LTC staff sought additional details from electronic health records, families, care coordinators, and hospitalists. Their ability to obtain missing information was influenced by organizational capacity, physician's practice location, power dynamics between providers, availability of family caregiver support, and access to electronic health records. A stronger primary/hospital-LTC collaboration, incentives for informational continuity, and a specific staff managing transition information and activities could optimize the LTC transition information exchange process.</p>","PeriodicalId":39854,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Management Forum","volume":" ","pages":"366-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13272821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Management Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704261426444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This multiple case study explored how Long-Term Care (LTC) teams in Ontario, Canada, manage informational continuity when older adults transition from community-based care to LTC. Five LTC homes, varying in size and rurality, participated, with 20 professionals interviewed across various roles, including nursing, medicine, rehabilitation, and administration. LTC providers emphasized the importance of comprehensive, accurate, and up-to-date biopsychosocial information to support effective care. However, information transferred from community and hospital sources was often incomplete or outdated. To address gaps, LTC staff sought additional details from electronic health records, families, care coordinators, and hospitalists. Their ability to obtain missing information was influenced by organizational capacity, physician's practice location, power dynamics between providers, availability of family caregiver support, and access to electronic health records. A stronger primary/hospital-LTC collaboration, incentives for informational continuity, and a specific staff managing transition information and activities could optimize the LTC transition information exchange process.

长期照护提供者对病人转入长期照护期间健康资讯交换的看法:多个案研究
本多案例研究探讨了加拿大安大略省长期护理(LTC)团队在老年人从社区护理过渡到长期护理时如何管理信息连续性。五个LTC家庭,不同的规模和乡村,参与了20名专业人员的不同角色的采访,包括护理,医学,康复和管理。LTC提供者强调了全面、准确和最新的生物心理社会信息对支持有效护理的重要性。然而,来自社区和医院的信息往往不完整或过时。为了解决差距,LTC工作人员从电子健康记录、家庭、护理协调员和医院医生那里寻求更多细节。他们获取缺失信息的能力受到组织能力、医生执业地点、提供者之间的权力动态、家庭护理人员支持的可用性以及电子健康记录的访问的影响。加强基层/医院与长期医疗中心的协作、激励信息连续性以及专门的工作人员管理过渡信息和活动可以优化长期医疗中心过渡信息交换过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare Management Forum
Healthcare Management Forum Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Healthcare Management Forum is the official journal of the Canadian College of Health Service Executives. It is the only peer-reviewed journal that covers issues related to advances in health services management, theory and practice in a Canadian context. The quality of its contributors, the rigorous review process and the leading-edge topics make it truly unique!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书