Attitudes Towards Digital Health Interventions in Germany: Findings From a Population-Based Representative Survey.

IF 2.8 Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2025-08-29 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.15233
Lena Sophia Steubl, Rebekka Büscher, Lasse Bosse Sander, Amit Baumel, Katja Barck, Cedric Sachser, Jörg Michael Fegert, Elmar Brähler, Harald Baumeister, Matthias Domhardt
{"title":"Attitudes Towards Digital Health Interventions in Germany: Findings From a Population-Based Representative Survey.","authors":"Lena Sophia Steubl, Rebekka Büscher, Lasse Bosse Sander, Amit Baumel, Katja Barck, Cedric Sachser, Jörg Michael Fegert, Elmar Brähler, Harald Baumeister, Matthias Domhardt","doi":"10.32872/cpe.15233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital (mental) health interventions have the potential to address barriers in mental health care. However, attitudes towards these interventions are a crucial factor to their successful implementation. Therefore, this study aims to assess those in a representative sample of the German adult population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A total of <i>N</i> = 2,519 participants took part in the survey as part of a larger study. Following a structured face-to-face interview, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire under the supervision of the interviewer. The questionnaire was based on the E-Therapy Attitudes Measure (ETAM) and the Attitudes towards Psychological Interventions Questionnaire (APOI). Results were analyzed by means of Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients and Spearman's ρ statistics. Supplementary open-ended questions explored participants' utilization of digital health interventions for specific conditions, the conditions they perceived as suitable for those, and the perceived barriers to their adoption. Replies on open-ended questions are summarized descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While a majority of participants (34.0%-41.5%) indicated partial agreement with the potential usefulness and advantages of digital health interventions (Items 1-3), a substantial proportion (45.8%, 95% CI [43.8%, 47.7%]) expressed an entire refusal to use them for future psychological problems (Item 4). Older individuals and those with lower educational status expressed particular critical views. Key barriers identified by participants comprised the absence of personal contact, technical issues, and concerns related to data privacy and security.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study indicate that while participants acknowledge the potential benefits of digital health interventions, the observed limited acceptance rates and identified barriers are to be addressed, in order to fully harness their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"7 3","pages":"e15233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12923191/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.15233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital (mental) health interventions have the potential to address barriers in mental health care. However, attitudes towards these interventions are a crucial factor to their successful implementation. Therefore, this study aims to assess those in a representative sample of the German adult population.

Method: A total of N = 2,519 participants took part in the survey as part of a larger study. Following a structured face-to-face interview, participants completed a self-administered questionnaire under the supervision of the interviewer. The questionnaire was based on the E-Therapy Attitudes Measure (ETAM) and the Attitudes towards Psychological Interventions Questionnaire (APOI). Results were analyzed by means of Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients and Spearman's ρ statistics. Supplementary open-ended questions explored participants' utilization of digital health interventions for specific conditions, the conditions they perceived as suitable for those, and the perceived barriers to their adoption. Replies on open-ended questions are summarized descriptively.

Results: While a majority of participants (34.0%-41.5%) indicated partial agreement with the potential usefulness and advantages of digital health interventions (Items 1-3), a substantial proportion (45.8%, 95% CI [43.8%, 47.7%]) expressed an entire refusal to use them for future psychological problems (Item 4). Older individuals and those with lower educational status expressed particular critical views. Key barriers identified by participants comprised the absence of personal contact, technical issues, and concerns related to data privacy and security.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that while participants acknowledge the potential benefits of digital health interventions, the observed limited acceptance rates and identified barriers are to be addressed, in order to fully harness their potential.

德国对数字健康干预的态度:一项基于人群的代表性调查结果
背景:数字(精神)健康干预措施有可能解决精神卫生保健中的障碍。然而,对这些干预措施的态度是其成功实施的关键因素。因此,本研究旨在评估那些在德国成年人口的代表性样本。方法:共有N = 2519名参与者参与了这项调查,作为一项更大研究的一部分。在结构化的面对面访谈之后,参与者在面试官的监督下完成了一份自我管理的问卷。问卷采用电子治疗态度量表(ETAM)和心理干预态度问卷(APOI)。采用Pearson积矩相关系数和Spearman ρ统计量对结果进行分析。补充开放式问题探讨了参与者在特定条件下使用数字健康干预措施的情况,他们认为适合这些条件的条件,以及他们认为采用这些干预措施的障碍。对开放式问题的答复进行了描述性总结。结果:虽然大多数参与者(34.0%-41.5%)表示部分同意数字健康干预的潜在有用性和优势(项目1-3),但相当大比例(45.8%,95% CI[43.8%, 47.7%])表示完全拒绝使用它们来解决未来的心理问题(项目4)。年龄较大的人和受教育程度较低的人表达了特别的批评意见。与会者确定的主要障碍包括缺乏个人接触、技术问题以及与数据隐私和安全有关的担忧。结论:本研究的结果表明,虽然参与者承认数字卫生干预措施的潜在好处,但观察到的有限接受率和确定的障碍有待解决,以便充分利用其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书