Phacoemulsification and Viscocanalostomy With or Without Silicone Implant in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.5 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research Pub Date : 2026-02-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18502/jovr.v21.17712
Saeed Shokouhi Rad, Ali Bagheri Asl, Shabnam Niroumand, Hamid Reza Heidarzadeh
{"title":"Phacoemulsification and Viscocanalostomy With or Without Silicone Implant in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Saeed Shokouhi Rad, Ali Bagheri Asl, Shabnam Niroumand, Hamid Reza Heidarzadeh","doi":"10.18502/jovr.v21.17712","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy with versus without intrascleral implantation of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) tube remnants in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and cataract.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized clinical trial involving 60 patients with cataract and POAG was carried out. The case group underwent phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy together with intrascleral implantation of AGV tube remnants, while the control group underwent the same procedures without any implant. The two groups were compared in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), cup-to-disc ratio, number of ocular hypotensive medications, surgical success rate, and scleral lake size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients were enrolled and equally divided into two groups. Postoperative IOP, BCVA, and cup-to-disc ratio did not differ significantly between the groups (<i>P</i> = 0.196, <i>P</i> = 0.724, and <i>P</i> = 0.443, respectively). Despite comparable IOP outcomes, the case group required a significantly higher number of ocular hypotensive medications at the final follow-up (<i>P</i> = 0.043). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) revealed significantly larger scleral lake dimensions in the case group in terms of length, height, surface area, and perimeter (all <i>P</i> <math><mo>≤</mo></math> 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found no significant difference in success rates or postoperative IOP control between combined phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy with or without silicone implants. Although the case group demonstrated larger scleral lake dimensions on AS-OCT, this anatomical difference did not translate into superior IOP outcomes and was associated with a higher requirement for postoperative ocular hypotensive medications. The clinical significance of increased scleral lake size in the presence of an implant remains uncertain, and longer-term follow-up is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16586,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","volume":"21 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12921452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jovr.v21.17712","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of combined phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy with versus without intrascleral implantation of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) tube remnants in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and cataract.

Methods: A randomized clinical trial involving 60 patients with cataract and POAG was carried out. The case group underwent phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy together with intrascleral implantation of AGV tube remnants, while the control group underwent the same procedures without any implant. The two groups were compared in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), cup-to-disc ratio, number of ocular hypotensive medications, surgical success rate, and scleral lake size.

Results: Sixty patients were enrolled and equally divided into two groups. Postoperative IOP, BCVA, and cup-to-disc ratio did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.196, P = 0.724, and P = 0.443, respectively). Despite comparable IOP outcomes, the case group required a significantly higher number of ocular hypotensive medications at the final follow-up (P = 0.043). Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) revealed significantly larger scleral lake dimensions in the case group in terms of length, height, surface area, and perimeter (all P 0.001).

Conclusion: Our study found no significant difference in success rates or postoperative IOP control between combined phacoemulsification and viscocanalostomy with or without silicone implants. Although the case group demonstrated larger scleral lake dimensions on AS-OCT, this anatomical difference did not translate into superior IOP outcomes and was associated with a higher requirement for postoperative ocular hypotensive medications. The clinical significance of increased scleral lake size in the presence of an implant remains uncertain, and longer-term follow-up is warranted.

有或没有硅胶植入治疗原发性开角型青光眼的超声乳化术和粘管吻合:一项随机临床试验。
目的:比较白内障合并开角型青光眼(POAG)患者行巩膜内置入术与不行AGV管残体置入术的疗效。方法:对60例白内障合并POAG患者进行随机临床试验。病例组行超声乳化术、粘管吻合术并巩膜内植入残余AGV管,对照组行相同手术,不植入。比较两组患者的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼压(IOP)、杯盘比、降压药数量、手术成功率、巩膜湖大小。结果:60例患者入组,平均分为两组。术后IOP、BCVA、杯盘比组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.196、P = 0.724、P = 0.443)。尽管IOP结果相当,但病例组在最后随访时需要的降压药物数量明显更高(P = 0.043)。前段光学相干断层扫描(AS-OCT)显示,病例组的巩膜湖尺寸在长度、高度、表面积和周长方面均显著增大(P均≤0.001)。结论:我们的研究发现联合超声乳化术和粘管造口术在手术成功率和术后IOP控制方面没有显著差异。尽管病例组在AS-OCT上显示出更大的巩膜湖尺寸,但这种解剖差异并没有转化为更好的IOP结果,而是与术后对降压药物的更高需求有关。植入物增加巩膜湖大小的临床意义尚不确定,需要长期随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书