Economic evaluation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in advanced hormonal receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer: a nationwide budget impact analysis.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-02-19 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2626640
Shereen Elazzazy, Nour Hisham Al-Ziftawi, Laila Shafei, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Salha Bojassoum, Anas Hamad
{"title":"Economic evaluation of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors in advanced hormonal receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer: a nationwide budget impact analysis.","authors":"Shereen Elazzazy, Nour Hisham Al-Ziftawi, Laila Shafei, Mohamed Izham Mohamed Ibrahim, Salha Bojassoum, Anas Hamad","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2626640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several trials demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes associated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in breast cancer patients. The challenge remains regarding their high costs. Ribociclib and Abemaciclib are cost-effective in Qatar. Yet, their affordability was not studied. This budget impact analysis (BIA) is to assess the affordability of adopting CDK4/6 inhibitors in Qatar over five years duration (2024-2028).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We ran a BIA to evaluate two scenarios: (1) Increasing abemaciclib's market share from 20% to 60%, replacing both palbociclib and ribociclib. (2) Assuming equal market share for both ribociclib and abemaciclib up to 80%, reducing palbociclib's share. The analysis considered treatment costs, patient population, and disease prevalence. All data were retrieved from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research, and costs were presented in Qatari Riyals (QAR). Sensitivity analyses were run to ensure the robustness of the conclusion. All results were compared to Qatar's budget threshold, which is QAR 453,822.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a total of 173 patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors, increasing abemaciclib's market share to 60% yielded cumulative savings of QAR 14 million over five years, which is around QAR 14,613 per patient per year. However, equally increasing ribociclib's and abemaciclib's market share to 80% resulted in a modest budget increase, remaining within acceptable thresholds. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, showing that cost reductions and higher uptake rates further enhanced savings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib is a budget-saving option for HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Qatar, should it replace the market share by up to 60% over five years. In addition, ribociclib and abemaciclib are affordable treatment options if they equally contributes to up to 80% of the market share for the eligible advanced breast cancer patients. The results supported the concept of allocating CDK4/6 inhibitors as they were found to be affordable to the Qatari healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2626640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12922424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2626640","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several trials demonstrated improvements in clinical outcomes associated with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in breast cancer patients. The challenge remains regarding their high costs. Ribociclib and Abemaciclib are cost-effective in Qatar. Yet, their affordability was not studied. This budget impact analysis (BIA) is to assess the affordability of adopting CDK4/6 inhibitors in Qatar over five years duration (2024-2028).

Methods: We ran a BIA to evaluate two scenarios: (1) Increasing abemaciclib's market share from 20% to 60%, replacing both palbociclib and ribociclib. (2) Assuming equal market share for both ribociclib and abemaciclib up to 80%, reducing palbociclib's share. The analysis considered treatment costs, patient population, and disease prevalence. All data were retrieved from the National Center for Cancer Care and Research, and costs were presented in Qatari Riyals (QAR). Sensitivity analyses were run to ensure the robustness of the conclusion. All results were compared to Qatar's budget threshold, which is QAR 453,822.

Results: Based on a total of 173 patients using CDK4/6 inhibitors, increasing abemaciclib's market share to 60% yielded cumulative savings of QAR 14 million over five years, which is around QAR 14,613 per patient per year. However, equally increasing ribociclib's and abemaciclib's market share to 80% resulted in a modest budget increase, remaining within acceptable thresholds. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings, showing that cost reductions and higher uptake rates further enhanced savings.

Conclusion: Abemaciclib is a budget-saving option for HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Qatar, should it replace the market share by up to 60% over five years. In addition, ribociclib and abemaciclib are affordable treatment options if they equally contributes to up to 80% of the market share for the eligible advanced breast cancer patients. The results supported the concept of allocating CDK4/6 inhibitors as they were found to be affordable to the Qatari healthcare system.

周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6抑制剂在晚期激素受体阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2阴性乳腺癌中的经济评价:一项全国性的预算影响分析
背景:几项试验表明,在乳腺癌患者中使用周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6 (CDK4/6)抑制剂可改善临床结果。挑战仍然在于它们的高成本。Ribociclib和Abemaciclib在卡塔尔具有成本效益。然而,他们的负担能力并没有得到研究。本预算影响分析(BIA)旨在评估卡塔尔在五年内(2024-2028年)采用CDK4/6抑制剂的可负担性。方法:通过BIA对两种情况进行评估:(1)将abemaciclib的市场份额从20%提高到60%,取代palbociclib和ribociclib。(2)假设ribociclib和abemaciclib的市场份额相等,达到80%,从而降低palbociclib的市场份额。分析考虑了治疗费用、患者人数和疾病患病率。所有数据均来自国家癌症护理和研究中心,费用以卡塔尔里亚尔(QAR)表示。进行敏感性分析以确保结论的稳健性。所有结果都与卡塔尔的预算门槛453,822卡塔尔里亚尔进行了比较。结果:基于173名使用CDK4/6抑制剂的患者,将abemaciclib的市场份额增加到60%,在五年内累计节省1400万卡塔尔里亚尔,约为每位患者每年14613卡塔尔里亚尔。然而,同样将ribociclib和abemaciclib的市场份额增加到80%,导致预算适度增加,仍在可接受的阈值范围内。敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性,表明成本的降低和更高的采用率进一步提高了节约。结论:Abemaciclib是卡塔尔HR+/HER2-乳腺癌的一种节省预算的选择,如果它能在5年内取代高达60%的市场份额。此外,如果ribociclib和abemaciclib对符合条件的晚期乳腺癌患者的市场份额达到80%,则它们是可负担得起的治疗选择。结果支持分配CDK4/6抑制剂的概念,因为它们被发现对卡塔尔医疗保健系统来说是负担得起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书