Invisible Threats, Concrete Actions: Analyzing and Enhancing OSHA's Infectious Disease Framework.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Security Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-22 DOI:10.1177/23265094251403977
Elizabeth M S Bramhall, Gigi K Gronvall, Gurumurthy Ramachandran
{"title":"Invisible Threats, Concrete Actions: Analyzing and Enhancing OSHA's Infectious Disease Framework.","authors":"Elizabeth M S Bramhall, Gigi K Gronvall, Gurumurthy Ramachandran","doi":"10.1177/23265094251403977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates employers provide a workplace \"free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm\" to employees; however, those regulations do not include workplace-acquired infectious diseases. This article examines federal and state regulations specific to workplace infectious disease exposures, highlighting their insufficiencies. The regulatory framework for occupational exposures to infectious diseases within United States workplaces is examined using specific criteria: (1) the intended scope of the federal or state standards, (2) the infectious diseases that are specifically covered, (3) the categories of workers covered, and (4) the limitations or constraints in the standard. We reviewed past attempts by OSHA to implement infectious disease standards, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workplace health, and the gaps in protections for nonhealthcare workers. Healthcare workers were temporarily covered under the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for COVID-19. Due to the expiration of that ETS in 2021, there are limited protections for all workers against the known hazards of various respiratory infectious diseases in the workplace. A comprehensive infectious disease standard from OSHA would address insufficiencies of the current standards protecting workers during outbreaks and with other respiratory diseases. Immediate action is required to establish a comprehensive OSHA standard that covers all industries, not just healthcare, and includes measures such as tailored worker infection control plans, enhanced ventilation, medical surveillance, infectious disease recordkeeping, and mandatory training. A unified national standard is needed to ensure public health preparedness and protect the workforce against future pandemics and endemic infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":12955,"journal":{"name":"Health Security","volume":" ","pages":"15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Security","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23265094251403977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) mandates employers provide a workplace "free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm" to employees; however, those regulations do not include workplace-acquired infectious diseases. This article examines federal and state regulations specific to workplace infectious disease exposures, highlighting their insufficiencies. The regulatory framework for occupational exposures to infectious diseases within United States workplaces is examined using specific criteria: (1) the intended scope of the federal or state standards, (2) the infectious diseases that are specifically covered, (3) the categories of workers covered, and (4) the limitations or constraints in the standard. We reviewed past attempts by OSHA to implement infectious disease standards, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workplace health, and the gaps in protections for nonhealthcare workers. Healthcare workers were temporarily covered under the OSHA Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) for COVID-19. Due to the expiration of that ETS in 2021, there are limited protections for all workers against the known hazards of various respiratory infectious diseases in the workplace. A comprehensive infectious disease standard from OSHA would address insufficiencies of the current standards protecting workers during outbreaks and with other respiratory diseases. Immediate action is required to establish a comprehensive OSHA standard that covers all industries, not just healthcare, and includes measures such as tailored worker infection control plans, enhanced ventilation, medical surveillance, infectious disease recordkeeping, and mandatory training. A unified national standard is needed to ensure public health preparedness and protect the workforce against future pandemics and endemic infectious diseases.

看不见的威胁,具体的行动:分析和完善OSHA传染病框架。
美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)要求雇主提供一个“没有导致或可能导致员工死亡或严重身体伤害的公认危害”的工作场所;但是,这些条例不包括工作场所获得性传染病。本文研究了联邦和州针对工作场所传染病暴露的法规,突出了它们的不足之处。美国工作场所职业接触传染病的监管框架是根据具体标准进行审查的:(1)联邦或州标准的预期范围,(2)具体涵盖的传染病,(3)涵盖的工人类别,以及(4)标准中的局限性或制约因素。我们回顾了OSHA过去实施传染病标准的尝试,COVID-19大流行对工作场所健康的影响,以及对非卫生保健工作者的保护差距。卫生保健工作者暂时受到OSHA COVID-19紧急临时标准(ETS)的保护。由于该排放交易体系将于2021年到期,所有工人在工作场所免受各种已知呼吸道传染病危害的保护有限。职业安全与卫生管理局制定的一项全面的传染病标准将解决目前在疾病暴发和其他呼吸道疾病期间保护工人的标准的不足之处。需要立即采取行动,建立一个全面的OSHA标准,涵盖所有行业,而不仅仅是医疗保健行业,并包括量身定制的工人感染控制计划、加强通风、医疗监控、传染病记录保存和强制性培训等措施。需要制定统一的国家标准,以确保公共卫生准备,并保护劳动力免受未来流行病和地方性传染病的侵害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Security
Health Security PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Health Security is a peer-reviewed journal providing research and essential guidance for the protection of people’s health before and after epidemics or disasters and for ensuring that communities are resilient to major challenges. The Journal explores the issues posed by disease outbreaks and epidemics; natural disasters; biological, chemical, and nuclear accidents or deliberate threats; foodborne outbreaks; and other health emergencies. It offers important insight into how to develop the systems needed to meet these challenges. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, Health Security covers research, innovations, methods, challenges, and ethical and legal dilemmas facing scientific, military, and health organizations. The Journal is a key resource for practitioners in these fields, policymakers, scientific experts, and government officials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书