Clinicians' time in different aspects of hypertension care: how far are we from optimal management required by guidelines? Results of an international survey of the working group of general practitioners' and team-based care of the European Society of Hypertension and the European General Practice Research Network.

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Blood Pressure Pub Date : 2026-12-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-25 DOI:10.1080/08037051.2026.2635826
Miriam Pikkemaat, Rosa de Pinho, Enrique Rodilla, Thomas Weber, Reinhold Kreutz, Thomas Frese, Minna Johansson, Bojan Jelakovic, Valerija Bralic Lang, Nina Dahle, Péter Torzsa, Andrew Oostindjer, Nikolaos Evangelidis, Areti Triantafyllou, Michael Doumas, Evangelos Fragkoulis, Fabio Albini, Jean-Marc Boivin, Anders Norrman, Andreas Stomby, János Nemcsik
{"title":"Clinicians' time in different aspects of hypertension care: how far are we from optimal management required by guidelines? Results of an international survey of the working group of general practitioners' and team-based care of the European Society of Hypertension and the European General Practice Research Network.","authors":"Miriam Pikkemaat, Rosa de Pinho, Enrique Rodilla, Thomas Weber, Reinhold Kreutz, Thomas Frese, Minna Johansson, Bojan Jelakovic, Valerija Bralic Lang, Nina Dahle, Péter Torzsa, Andrew Oostindjer, Nikolaos Evangelidis, Areti Triantafyllou, Michael Doumas, Evangelos Fragkoulis, Fabio Albini, Jean-Marc Boivin, Anders Norrman, Andreas Stomby, János Nemcsik","doi":"10.1080/08037051.2026.2635826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension management guidelines provide recommendations for optimal patient care. However, the limited time available of clinicians is rarely considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time clinicians currently spend on different components of hypertension care during an average workday and to assess physicians' perceptions of the time required for optimal, guideline-based care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an international, cross-sectional, anonymous questionnaire-based survey among physicians involved in hypertension care. A 37-item questionnaire assessed time spent on, and time perceived as necessary for, guideline-recommended hypertension-related activities during an average workday. The survey was distributed through the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) between 1 June and 15 September 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>370 responses were collected from 49 countries worldwide (91.3% from Europe). After data clarification 357 responses were analysed. Of these, 153 (42.9%) were general practitioners (GPs) and 204 (57.1%) were other specialists (internists, cardiologists, nephrologists). Across all assessed activities, clinicians consistently reported a gap between the time currently spent and the time perceived as necessary for optimal care, including office blood pressure measurement, home blood pressure measurement education, lifestyle counselling, and cardiovascular risk stratification. Differences were also observed between the practice of GPs and other specialists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This international survey demonstrates substantial perceived gaps between available and required time for several components of hypertension care, particularly in general practice. These findings highlight the importance of considering real-world clinician time constraints in the development and prioritisation of hypertension guideline recommendations and suggest that adequate health-system resources are needed to support their implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9000,"journal":{"name":"Blood Pressure","volume":" ","pages":"2635826"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Pressure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2635826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension management guidelines provide recommendations for optimal patient care. However, the limited time available of clinicians is rarely considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time clinicians currently spend on different components of hypertension care during an average workday and to assess physicians' perceptions of the time required for optimal, guideline-based care.

Methods: We conducted an international, cross-sectional, anonymous questionnaire-based survey among physicians involved in hypertension care. A 37-item questionnaire assessed time spent on, and time perceived as necessary for, guideline-recommended hypertension-related activities during an average workday. The survey was distributed through the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European General Practice Research Network (EGPRN) between 1 June and 15 September 2025.

Results: 370 responses were collected from 49 countries worldwide (91.3% from Europe). After data clarification 357 responses were analysed. Of these, 153 (42.9%) were general practitioners (GPs) and 204 (57.1%) were other specialists (internists, cardiologists, nephrologists). Across all assessed activities, clinicians consistently reported a gap between the time currently spent and the time perceived as necessary for optimal care, including office blood pressure measurement, home blood pressure measurement education, lifestyle counselling, and cardiovascular risk stratification. Differences were also observed between the practice of GPs and other specialists.

Conclusions: This international survey demonstrates substantial perceived gaps between available and required time for several components of hypertension care, particularly in general practice. These findings highlight the importance of considering real-world clinician time constraints in the development and prioritisation of hypertension guideline recommendations and suggest that adequate health-system resources are needed to support their implementation.

临床医生在高血压护理不同方面的时间:我们离指南要求的最佳管理还有多远?欧洲高血压学会和欧洲全科医生研究网络全科医生和团队护理工作组的国际调查结果。
背景:高血压管理指南为患者提供最佳护理建议。然而,很少考虑到临床医生的有限时间。本研究的目的是评估临床医生目前在平均工作日内花在高血压护理不同组成部分上的时间,并评估医生对最佳的、基于指南的护理所需时间的看法。方法:我们对参与高血压护理的医生进行了一项国际、横断面、匿名问卷调查。一份包含37个项目的调查问卷评估了在平均工作日中,指南推荐的与高血压相关的活动所花费的时间和认为必要的时间。该调查于2025年6月1日至9月15日期间通过欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲全科医学研究网络(EGPRN)分发。结果:从全球49个国家收集了370份回复(91.3%来自欧洲)。数据澄清后,分析了357份回复。其中,153名(42.9%)是全科医生(gp), 204名(57.1%)是其他专科医生(内科医生、心脏病专家、肾病专家)。在所有评估活动中,临床医生一致报告当前花费的时间与认为最佳护理所需的时间之间存在差距,包括办公室血压测量、家庭血压测量教育、生活方式咨询和心血管风险分层。全科医生和其他专科医生的做法也存在差异。结论:这项国际调查表明,高血压治疗的几个组成部分的可用时间和所需时间之间存在明显的差距,特别是在一般实践中。这些发现强调了在制定和优先考虑高血压指南建议时考虑现实世界临床医生时间限制的重要性,并建议需要足够的卫生系统资源来支持其实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For outstanding coverage of the latest advances in hypertension research, turn to Blood Pressure, a primary source for authoritative and timely information on all aspects of hypertension research and management. Features include: • Physiology and pathophysiology of blood pressure regulation • Primary and secondary hypertension • Cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications of hypertension • Detection, treatment and follow-up of hypertension • Non pharmacological and pharmacological management • Large outcome trials in hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书