Theories X and Y in five parts of the organization.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Acta Psychologica Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106473
Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Talukdar
{"title":"Theories X and Y in five parts of the organization.","authors":"Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Talukdar","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most important resource for an organization's success is still its human capital. Despite being the primary driver of organizational success, human resources' motivation and interpersonal dynamics are frequently taken into account independently of structural design. But in this paradigm, integrating structural and motivational theories is considered to be necessary to comprehend organizational behavior. The study offers a theoretical synthesis by applying McGregor's theories X and Y to Mintzberg's five organizational components-strategic apex, middle line, operating core, technostructure, and support staff-within a postmodern framework. Through conceptual clarification, advances in literature, and participant observations, the study demonstrates how managerial assumptions impact organizational dynamics across structural layers. The findings demonstrate that theory Y is compatible with leadership and knowledge-intensive roles, encouraging creativity, autonomy, and participatory decision-making, while hybrid X-Y applications optimize coordination and standardization functions, ensuring accountability and operational efficiency. By bridging classical and neoclassical paradigms to propose a structural-motivational alignment model, the study advances organizational theory, provides managers and policymakers with practical insights to create adaptive strategies that improve engagement, innovation, and resilience, and enhances the discussion in organizational psychology and management science. Future research on motivation-driven structural design in dynamic and complex environments will have a strong basis thanks to the interdisciplinary implications that span organizational psychology, leadership studies, and human resource management. Contribution: The study's unique contribution in this context is an applied concept that links McGregor's theories X and Y with Mintzberg's five components of organization while upholding the widely accepted premise that people are an organization's primary source of success.</p>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"264 ","pages":"106473"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The most important resource for an organization's success is still its human capital. Despite being the primary driver of organizational success, human resources' motivation and interpersonal dynamics are frequently taken into account independently of structural design. But in this paradigm, integrating structural and motivational theories is considered to be necessary to comprehend organizational behavior. The study offers a theoretical synthesis by applying McGregor's theories X and Y to Mintzberg's five organizational components-strategic apex, middle line, operating core, technostructure, and support staff-within a postmodern framework. Through conceptual clarification, advances in literature, and participant observations, the study demonstrates how managerial assumptions impact organizational dynamics across structural layers. The findings demonstrate that theory Y is compatible with leadership and knowledge-intensive roles, encouraging creativity, autonomy, and participatory decision-making, while hybrid X-Y applications optimize coordination and standardization functions, ensuring accountability and operational efficiency. By bridging classical and neoclassical paradigms to propose a structural-motivational alignment model, the study advances organizational theory, provides managers and policymakers with practical insights to create adaptive strategies that improve engagement, innovation, and resilience, and enhances the discussion in organizational psychology and management science. Future research on motivation-driven structural design in dynamic and complex environments will have a strong basis thanks to the interdisciplinary implications that span organizational psychology, leadership studies, and human resource management. Contribution: The study's unique contribution in this context is an applied concept that links McGregor's theories X and Y with Mintzberg's five components of organization while upholding the widely accepted premise that people are an organization's primary source of success.

X理论和Y理论在组织的五个部分。
一个组织成功的最重要的资源仍然是人力资本。尽管是组织成功的主要驱动力,但人力资源的动机和人际动态经常被独立于结构设计之外考虑。但在这种范式中,整合结构理论和动机理论被认为是理解组织行为的必要条件。该研究通过将McGregor的X和Y理论应用于明茨伯格的五个组织要素——战略顶点、中线、运营核心、技术结构和支持人员——在后现代框架内,提供了一个理论综合。通过概念澄清、文献进展和参与者观察,本研究展示了管理假设如何跨结构层影响组织动力学。研究结果表明,Y理论与领导和知识密集型角色兼容,鼓励创造力、自主性和参与性决策,而混合X-Y应用优化了协调和标准化功能,确保了问责制和运营效率。本研究通过连接古典范式和新古典范式,提出了一个结构-动机一致性模型,促进了组织理论的发展,为管理者和决策者提供了实践见解,以创建提高敬业度、创新和弹性的适应性策略,并促进了组织心理学和管理科学的讨论。由于组织心理学、领导力研究和人力资源管理的跨学科影响,未来动态和复杂环境中动机驱动结构设计的研究将有坚实的基础。贡献:该研究在此背景下的独特贡献是一个应用概念,将麦格雷戈的X和Y理论与明茨伯格的组织五要素理论联系起来,同时坚持了一个被广泛接受的前提,即人是组织成功的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书