{"title":"Classifying avian drinking behaviour: ecological insights and implications in a changing world","authors":"Shannon R. Conradie, Marc T. Freeman","doi":"10.1002/brv.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Water is a fundamental currency of life, and its availability significantly influences animal behaviour, physiology and distributions. However, our knowledge around the dependence on water for drinking and the direct and indirect mechanisms driving related behaviours remains partial in the context of changing climates. Here, we review patterns and classifications of avian reliance on water consumption and the role of abiotic and biotic factors in drinking habits. We bring to light the void of information regarding drinking habits in relation to thermal physiology, and then review existing literature related to the behaviour of drinking. We attempt to highlight misconceptions related to the typical classification of drinkers <i>versus</i> non-drinkers and direct future research efforts to improve our understanding of the dynamic relationship between water availability, acquisition, and maintenance under climate change. We conclude that despite the common dichotomous use of drinking <i>versus</i> non-drinking classifications in climate vulnerability assessments, this trait is highly flexible and occurs along a continuum from specialist non-drinking species to highly dependent drinking species driven by abiotic and biotic pressures. While some recent assessments continue to apply binary traits, our gradient-based approach advances ecological relevance by accounting for context-dependent flexibility. Consequently, previous approaches assessing drinking <i>versus</i> non-drinking species may not be as ecologically relevant as previously thought. Improving our understanding of the spatial and temporal trends in how species acquire or use water for drinking, along with sound empirical data, will continue to shape our theoretical understanding of this trait. We emphasise that understanding drinking as a trait is critically important for comprehending species vulnerabilities to anticipated future climates, especially given predicted changes and increased variability in water availability.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"101 4","pages":"1851-1862"},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/brv.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/brv.70150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Water is a fundamental currency of life, and its availability significantly influences animal behaviour, physiology and distributions. However, our knowledge around the dependence on water for drinking and the direct and indirect mechanisms driving related behaviours remains partial in the context of changing climates. Here, we review patterns and classifications of avian reliance on water consumption and the role of abiotic and biotic factors in drinking habits. We bring to light the void of information regarding drinking habits in relation to thermal physiology, and then review existing literature related to the behaviour of drinking. We attempt to highlight misconceptions related to the typical classification of drinkers versus non-drinkers and direct future research efforts to improve our understanding of the dynamic relationship between water availability, acquisition, and maintenance under climate change. We conclude that despite the common dichotomous use of drinking versus non-drinking classifications in climate vulnerability assessments, this trait is highly flexible and occurs along a continuum from specialist non-drinking species to highly dependent drinking species driven by abiotic and biotic pressures. While some recent assessments continue to apply binary traits, our gradient-based approach advances ecological relevance by accounting for context-dependent flexibility. Consequently, previous approaches assessing drinking versus non-drinking species may not be as ecologically relevant as previously thought. Improving our understanding of the spatial and temporal trends in how species acquire or use water for drinking, along with sound empirical data, will continue to shape our theoretical understanding of this trait. We emphasise that understanding drinking as a trait is critically important for comprehending species vulnerabilities to anticipated future climates, especially given predicted changes and increased variability in water availability.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.