Developing measures of type A behavior in children and adolescents.

K Kirmil-Gray, J R Eagleston, C E Thoresen, L Heft, B Arnow, P Bracke
{"title":"Developing measures of type A behavior in children and adolescents.","authors":"K Kirmil-Gray,&nbsp;J R Eagleston,&nbsp;C E Thoresen,&nbsp;L Heft,&nbsp;B Arnow,&nbsp;P Bracke","doi":"10.1080/0097840X.1987.9936789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Development of measures of Type A behavior in children and adolescents is described and the results of two studies to validate these measures are given. Children in the fifth, seventh, and ninth grades (n = 120 in Study I; n = 652 in Study II) were given five measures of the Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP): the Student Type A Behavior Scale (STABS); Student Structured Interviews (SSI), scored separately for content and behavior; Matthews Youth Test for Health (MYTH); and Parent Observation Checklist, as well as measures of state anxiety, trait anxiety, and depression. Descriptive statistics from the two samples were very similar and indicated that boys scored significantly higher than girls on the MYTH, while seventh and ninth grade girls scored significantly higher than fifth grade girls or boys of any grade on Structured Interview Behavior (SSI-Behavior). Correlations suggested separate self-reported perceptual and behavioral components of Type A behavior in children. In both studies, STABS and SSI-Content correlated moderately well (.48 to .49) but had little relationship with SI-Behavior and the MYTH. Measures of anxiety and depression included to assess discriminant validity were correlated with the self-report measures of TABP (.22 to .56), but showed little relationship with the behavioral measures, especially in the larger cross-validation study. Parallels between these results and those of adult studies are discussed, and the use of multiple measures in classifying subjects is suggested.</p>","PeriodicalId":76006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human stress","volume":"13 1","pages":"5-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0097840X.1987.9936789","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1987.9936789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Development of measures of Type A behavior in children and adolescents is described and the results of two studies to validate these measures are given. Children in the fifth, seventh, and ninth grades (n = 120 in Study I; n = 652 in Study II) were given five measures of the Type A Behavior Pattern (TABP): the Student Type A Behavior Scale (STABS); Student Structured Interviews (SSI), scored separately for content and behavior; Matthews Youth Test for Health (MYTH); and Parent Observation Checklist, as well as measures of state anxiety, trait anxiety, and depression. Descriptive statistics from the two samples were very similar and indicated that boys scored significantly higher than girls on the MYTH, while seventh and ninth grade girls scored significantly higher than fifth grade girls or boys of any grade on Structured Interview Behavior (SSI-Behavior). Correlations suggested separate self-reported perceptual and behavioral components of Type A behavior in children. In both studies, STABS and SSI-Content correlated moderately well (.48 to .49) but had little relationship with SI-Behavior and the MYTH. Measures of anxiety and depression included to assess discriminant validity were correlated with the self-report measures of TABP (.22 to .56), but showed little relationship with the behavioral measures, especially in the larger cross-validation study. Parallels between these results and those of adult studies are discussed, and the use of multiple measures in classifying subjects is suggested.

制定儿童和青少年A型行为的测量方法。
描述了儿童和青少年A型行为测量的发展,并给出了验证这些测量的两项研究的结果。五年级,七年级和九年级的儿童(n = 120在研究一;研究II中n = 652名学生的A型行为模式(TABP)有五种测量方法:学生A型行为量表(STABS);学生结构化访谈(SSI),内容和行为分开评分;马修斯青少年健康测试(神话);和家长观察表,以及状态焦虑、特质焦虑和抑郁的测量。来自两个样本的描述性统计数据非常相似,表明男孩在MYTH上的得分明显高于女孩,而七年级和九年级的女孩在结构化访谈行为(SSI-Behavior)上的得分明显高于五年级的女孩或任何年级的男孩。相关性表明儿童A型行为的自我报告知觉和行为成分是分开的。在两项研究中,STABS与SSI-Content的相关性均为中等。48 ~ 0.49),但与SI-Behavior和MYTH关系不大。用于评估区别效度的焦虑和抑郁测量值与TABP自我报告测量值相关(p < 0.05)。22至0.56),但与行为测量的关系不大,特别是在更大的交叉验证研究中。讨论了这些结果与成人研究结果之间的相似之处,并建议使用多种方法对受试者进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信