Discriminant validity of the Crown-Crisp Experiential Index.

P M Burgess, L Mazzocco, I M Campbell
{"title":"Discriminant validity of the Crown-Crisp Experiential Index.","authors":"P M Burgess, L Mazzocco, I M Campbell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discriminative power of the CCEI subscales was examined. Several approaches were undertaken on the responses from subjects in three neurotically disturbed groups and a normal control group. Analyses indicated that simple cut-off points could discriminate effectively an 'adjusted-neurotic' dimension; simple cut-off points were relatively more difficult to develop for discrimination among the three neurotically disturbed groups. Discriminant analysis of the CCEI subscales indicated that approximately 74 per cent of all subjects could be classified correctly. The OBS and HYS subscales were not found to be effective discriminators among the four groups. While that finding may question the utility of those scales, an alternative explanation was proposed in terms of the characteristics of the present samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":76611,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of medical psychology","volume":"60 ( Pt 1) ","pages":"61-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of medical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The discriminative power of the CCEI subscales was examined. Several approaches were undertaken on the responses from subjects in three neurotically disturbed groups and a normal control group. Analyses indicated that simple cut-off points could discriminate effectively an 'adjusted-neurotic' dimension; simple cut-off points were relatively more difficult to develop for discrimination among the three neurotically disturbed groups. Discriminant analysis of the CCEI subscales indicated that approximately 74 per cent of all subjects could be classified correctly. The OBS and HYS subscales were not found to be effective discriminators among the four groups. While that finding may question the utility of those scales, an alternative explanation was proposed in terms of the characteristics of the present samples.

冠脆体验指数的判别效度。
检验CCEI各分量表的判别能力。对三个神经障碍组和一个正常对照组的受试者的反应进行了几种方法。分析表明,简单的分界点可以有效地区分“调整神经质”维度;简单的分界点相对来说更难以在三个神经障碍组之间进行区分。CCEI子量表的判别分析表明,大约74%的受试者可以被正确分类。在四组中,OBS和HYS分量表没有被发现是有效的鉴别因子。虽然这一发现可能会质疑这些量表的效用,但根据目前样本的特征,提出了另一种解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信