The measurement of subjective response to stressful life events.

E A Marziali, P A Pilkonis
{"title":"The measurement of subjective response to stressful life events.","authors":"E A Marziali,&nbsp;P A Pilkonis","doi":"10.1080/0097840X.1986.9936760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A scale was developed to assess subjective responses to stressful life events. Over 400 subjects (divided between psychiatric patients and nonpatients) completed the 14-item response-to-stress scale for events perceived as personally important. Optimal scale item weights were assigned on the basis of Nishisato's dual scaling procedure. Four items, typically associated with responses to stress, did not contribute to the item-weight solution and were dropped from the scale. Factor analyses showed that responses to stress loaded on one bipolar factor composed of four emotional distress items and six control-management items. In contrast to previous methods developed to assess response to stress, there was less than 4% overlap between the subjective response to stress mean scores and the total number of events endorsed by each subject. Also, the correlations between simple event counts and symptom index scores were smaller than those between the subjective stress-response scores and the symptom variable. The influence of demographic factors on both the patients' and nonpatients' responses to stress were analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":76006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of human stress","volume":"12 1","pages":"5-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0097840X.1986.9936760","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of human stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0097840X.1986.9936760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

A scale was developed to assess subjective responses to stressful life events. Over 400 subjects (divided between psychiatric patients and nonpatients) completed the 14-item response-to-stress scale for events perceived as personally important. Optimal scale item weights were assigned on the basis of Nishisato's dual scaling procedure. Four items, typically associated with responses to stress, did not contribute to the item-weight solution and were dropped from the scale. Factor analyses showed that responses to stress loaded on one bipolar factor composed of four emotional distress items and six control-management items. In contrast to previous methods developed to assess response to stress, there was less than 4% overlap between the subjective response to stress mean scores and the total number of events endorsed by each subject. Also, the correlations between simple event counts and symptom index scores were smaller than those between the subjective stress-response scores and the symptom variable. The influence of demographic factors on both the patients' and nonpatients' responses to stress were analyzed.

对生活压力事件主观反应的测量。
开发了一个量表来评估对压力生活事件的主观反应。超过400名受试者(分为精神病患者和非患者)完成了14个项目的应激反应量表,以衡量个人认为重要的事件。根据nisisato的双标度方法,确定了最优标度项目的权重。有四个项目通常与对压力的反应有关,它们对项目重量的解决方案没有贡献,因此被从量表中删除。因子分析表明,应激反应加载在一个双相因素上,该因素由四个情绪困扰项目和六个控制管理项目组成。与之前开发的评估压力反应的方法相比,对压力的主观反应平均得分与每个受试者认可的事件总数之间的重叠不到4%。简单事件数与症状指数得分的相关性小于主观应激反应得分与症状变量的相关性。分析人口学因素对患者和非患者应激反应的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信