Second Attempt at America First: Donald Trump and the Survival of International Organizations

IF 2.2 3区 社会学 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Hylke Dijkstra
{"title":"Second Attempt at America First: Donald Trump and the Survival of International Organizations","authors":"Hylke Dijkstra","doi":"10.1111/1758-5899.70107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The second Trump administration poses an existential challenge to many international organizations (IOs), putting them at risk of no longer being able to perform their core functions. Compared to the first term, the scope of America First is much wider and the speed much faster. Trump no longer sticks to IO rules and is structurally undermining the US domestic agencies that provide input for IOs. At the same time, the academic literature highlights the overwhelming resilience of IOs over the last two centuries, and the demand for IOs to address international problems remains high. The loss of US funding, membership, and input is real, but an equally important question is how IOs themselves and the other members cope with and counter this challenge. Several leaders of IOs have pro-actively stepped up and are strategizing on how to protect their organizations. In light of the imminent budget pressures, many IOs will have to downsize and potentially merge with other international institutions. IOs may thus become less central to the conduct of international relations. Yet, unless the Trump administration, in improbably collective action with China and Russia, manages to overthrow the whole postwar international system, IOs will remain relevant actors.</p>","PeriodicalId":51510,"journal":{"name":"Global Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"4-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1758-5899.70107","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1758-5899.70107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The second Trump administration poses an existential challenge to many international organizations (IOs), putting them at risk of no longer being able to perform their core functions. Compared to the first term, the scope of America First is much wider and the speed much faster. Trump no longer sticks to IO rules and is structurally undermining the US domestic agencies that provide input for IOs. At the same time, the academic literature highlights the overwhelming resilience of IOs over the last two centuries, and the demand for IOs to address international problems remains high. The loss of US funding, membership, and input is real, but an equally important question is how IOs themselves and the other members cope with and counter this challenge. Several leaders of IOs have pro-actively stepped up and are strategizing on how to protect their organizations. In light of the imminent budget pressures, many IOs will have to downsize and potentially merge with other international institutions. IOs may thus become less central to the conduct of international relations. Yet, unless the Trump administration, in improbably collective action with China and Russia, manages to overthrow the whole postwar international system, IOs will remain relevant actors.

《美国第一的第二次尝试:唐纳德·特朗普与国际组织的生存
第二届特朗普政府对许多国际组织构成了生死存亡的挑战,使它们面临无法再履行其核心职能的风险。与第一届相比,美国优先的范围更广,速度也快得多。特朗普不再遵守国际奥委会的规则,并从结构上削弱了为国际奥委会提供信息的美国国内机构。与此同时,学术文献强调了IOs在过去两个世纪中具有压倒性的弹性,并且对IOs解决国际问题的需求仍然很高。美国资金、会员和投入的流失是真实存在的,但同样重要的问题是IOs自身和其他成员如何应对和应对这一挑战。IOs的几位领导者已经积极采取行动,制定了保护组织的策略。鉴于迫在眉睫的预算压力,许多国际组织将不得不缩减规模,并可能与其他国际机构合并。因此,国际组织在处理国际关系方面可能不再那么重要。然而,除非特朗普政府与中国和俄罗斯采取不太可能的集体行动,设法推翻整个战后国际体系,否则国际组织仍将是重要的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Policy
Global Policy Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
125
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书