Mortality in the beta blocker heart attack trial: Circumstances surrounding death

Robert W. Peters , Robert Byington , Daniel Arensberg , Lawrence M. Friedman , Donald W. Romhilt , Allan Barker , Charles Laubach , Gary W. Wilner , Sidney Goldstein
{"title":"Mortality in the beta blocker heart attack trial: Circumstances surrounding death","authors":"Robert W. Peters ,&nbsp;Robert Byington ,&nbsp;Daniel Arensberg ,&nbsp;Lawrence M. Friedman ,&nbsp;Donald W. Romhilt ,&nbsp;Allan Barker ,&nbsp;Charles Laubach ,&nbsp;Gary W. Wilner ,&nbsp;Sidney Goldstein","doi":"10.1016/0021-9681(87)90098-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial, a double blind, randomized, controlled study, patients taking propranolol (180 or 240 mg/day) initiated 5–21 days post myocardial infarction had 26% fewer deaths than those taking placebo over a 25 month (mean) followup. Detailed analysis of the circumstances surrounding the BHAT deaths failed to reveal any striking difference between propranolol and placebo in the type of clinical event preceding death, the incidence and type of acute and prodromal signs and symptoms, the location of death, the activity preceding death or the percentage of deaths that were sudden or instantaneous, suggesting that propranolol may exert an “across the board” effect and improve survival by a combination of mechanisms. An unexpected finding was that the protective effect of propranolol appeared to occur during the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chronic diseases","volume":"40 1","pages":"Pages 75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90098-1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chronic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0021968187900981","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

In the Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial, a double blind, randomized, controlled study, patients taking propranolol (180 or 240 mg/day) initiated 5–21 days post myocardial infarction had 26% fewer deaths than those taking placebo over a 25 month (mean) followup. Detailed analysis of the circumstances surrounding the BHAT deaths failed to reveal any striking difference between propranolol and placebo in the type of clinical event preceding death, the incidence and type of acute and prodromal signs and symptoms, the location of death, the activity preceding death or the percentage of deaths that were sudden or instantaneous, suggesting that propranolol may exert an “across the board” effect and improve survival by a combination of mechanisms. An unexpected finding was that the protective effect of propranolol appeared to occur during the hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.

-受体阻滞剂心脏病发作试验中的死亡率:死亡周围环境
在β受体阻滞剂心脏病发作试验(一项双盲、随机对照研究)中,心肌梗死后5-21天开始服用心得安(180或240毫克/天)的患者在25个月(平均)随访期间的死亡率比服用安慰剂的患者低26%。对BHAT死亡情况的详细分析未能揭示心得安与安慰剂在死亡前的临床事件类型、急性和前期体征和症状的发生率和类型、死亡地点、死亡前的活动或突然或瞬间死亡的百分比方面有任何显著差异,这表明心得安可能发挥"全面"效应,并通过多种机制提高生存率。一个意想不到的发现是,心得安的保护作用似乎发生在晚上10点到早上7点之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信