Inflammatory indices, machine learning and artificial intelligence in tubal ectopic pregnancy management.

IF 1.3 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Uğurcan Zorlu, Senem Arda Düz, Gül Kurtaran, Mohammad İbrahim Halilzade, Burak Elmas
{"title":"Inflammatory indices, machine learning and artificial intelligence in tubal ectopic pregnancy management.","authors":"Uğurcan Zorlu, Senem Arda Düz, Gül Kurtaran, Mohammad İbrahim Halilzade, Burak Elmas","doi":"10.4274/tjod.galenos.2026.37165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the predictive value of hematologic and biochemical inflammatory indices for methotrexate (MTX) treatment outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) and to develop machine learning (ML) models for individualized risk stratification.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort included 293 hemodynamically stable TEP patients who were treated with a single dose of MTX between January 2019 and December 2023. Demographic, clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Inflammatory indices-including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR)-were calculated. Outcomes were categorized as single-dose MTX success, requirement for additional MTX, or surgery. Predictive accuracy of five supervised ML algorithms was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Single-dose MTX was successful in 65.5% of patients; 18.4% required an additional dose, and 16.0% underwent surgery. AISI had the highest predictive accuracy for surgery [area under the curve (AUC)=0.929], followed by SIRI (AUC=0.899) and FAR (AUC=0.847). NLR best predicted the need for additional MTX (AUC=0.675). Naïve Bayes achieved the highest performance for surgical prediction (accuracy=98.3%, AUC=0.998), while random forest and gradient boosting were most effective in predicting the need for additional MTX (accuracy=83.1%, AUC=0.884-0.896). Feature importance analyses consistently ranked AISI, SIRI, and FAR as top predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AISI, SIRI, and FAR are strong predictors of MTX failure and surgical intervention in TEP. Combining these biomarkers with ML models markedly improves predictive performance and supports a personalized approach to TEP management. Multicenter prospective validation is needed before clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":45340,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"47-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12963803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2026.37165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the predictive value of hematologic and biochemical inflammatory indices for methotrexate (MTX) treatment outcomes in tubal ectopic pregnancy (TEP) and to develop machine learning (ML) models for individualized risk stratification.

Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort included 293 hemodynamically stable TEP patients who were treated with a single dose of MTX between January 2019 and December 2023. Demographic, clinical, ultrasonographic, and laboratory data were analyzed. Inflammatory indices-including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI), and fibrinogen-to-albumin ratio (FAR)-were calculated. Outcomes were categorized as single-dose MTX success, requirement for additional MTX, or surgery. Predictive accuracy of five supervised ML algorithms was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: Single-dose MTX was successful in 65.5% of patients; 18.4% required an additional dose, and 16.0% underwent surgery. AISI had the highest predictive accuracy for surgery [area under the curve (AUC)=0.929], followed by SIRI (AUC=0.899) and FAR (AUC=0.847). NLR best predicted the need for additional MTX (AUC=0.675). Naïve Bayes achieved the highest performance for surgical prediction (accuracy=98.3%, AUC=0.998), while random forest and gradient boosting were most effective in predicting the need for additional MTX (accuracy=83.1%, AUC=0.884-0.896). Feature importance analyses consistently ranked AISI, SIRI, and FAR as top predictors.

Conclusion: AISI, SIRI, and FAR are strong predictors of MTX failure and surgical intervention in TEP. Combining these biomarkers with ML models markedly improves predictive performance and supports a personalized approach to TEP management. Multicenter prospective validation is needed before clinical application.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

炎症指标、机器学习和人工智能在输卵管异位妊娠管理中的应用。
目的:评价血液学及生化炎症指标对甲氨蝶呤(MTX)治疗输卵管异位妊娠(TEP)预后的预测价值,并建立个体化风险分层的机器学习(ML)模型。材料和方法:该回顾性队列包括293例血液动力学稳定的TEP患者,这些患者在2019年1月至2023年12月期间接受单剂量MTX治疗。对人口学、临床、超声和实验室数据进行分析。计算炎症指数,包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值、全身免疫炎症指数、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)、全身炎症聚集指数(AISI)和纤维蛋白原与白蛋白比值(FAR)。结果分为单剂量MTX成功、需要额外的MTX或手术。使用接收者工作特征分析评估了五种监督ML算法的预测准确性。结果:单次甲氨蝶呤治疗成功率为65.5%;18.4%的人需要额外剂量,16.0%的人接受了手术。AISI对手术的预测准确率最高[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.929],其次是SIRI (AUC=0.899)和FAR (AUC=0.847)。NLR最能预测额外MTX的需求(AUC=0.675)。Naïve贝叶斯在手术预测方面取得了最高的表现(准确率=98.3%,AUC=0.998),而随机森林和梯度增强在预测额外MTX需求方面最有效(准确率=83.1%,AUC=0.884-0.896)。功能重要性分析一致将AISI、SIRI和FAR列为最重要的预测因子。结论:AISI、SIRI和FAR是TEP MTX失败和手术干预的有力预测因子。将这些生物标志物与ML模型相结合可显著提高预测性能,并支持TEP管理的个性化方法。临床应用前需要多中心前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书