Arne Åsberg, Ann Elisabeth Åsberg, Øyvind Skadberg
{"title":"Divide or subtract: transferrin saturation versus unbound iron binding capacity (UIBC).","authors":"Arne Åsberg, Ann Elisabeth Åsberg, Øyvind Skadberg","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2026.2632315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transferrin saturation in plasma (P-TSAT) is 100 × P-iron/P-total iron binding capacity (P-TIBC). It is still used to diagnose iron deficiency, although P-ferritin is considered to be a better test. Both tests are sensitive to inflammation: P-TSAT decreases and P-ferritin increases. Unbound iron binding capacity in plasma (P-UIBC), which is P-TIBC minus P-iron, has a better diagnostic accuracy for iron deficiency than P-TSAT. However, how P-UIBC reacts in inflammation is less well known. We used cross-sectional data from 21681 patients to study how P-UIBC, P-TSAT, and P-ferritin varied with P-CRP. In a subpopulation of 8928 patients without inflammation (P-CRP ≤ 1 mg/L), we compared the diagnostic accuracy of P-TSAT and P-UIBC, using P-ferritin less than 15, 20, and 30 µg/L as reference standards for iron deficiency. We also estimated which values of P-UIBC and P-TSAT corresponded to a P-ferritin of 15, 20, and 30 µg/L. P-UIBC varied much less with P-CRP than did P-TSAT and P-ferritin. P-UIBC had better diagnostic accuracy than P-TSAT. Using P-ferritin < 20 µg/L as a reference standard, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.894 (95% confidence interval 0.883-0.905) for P-UIBC and 0.850 (0.836-0.864) for P-TSAT. At various ages, the values corresponding to a P-ferritin of 20 µg/L varied around 60 µmol/L for P-UIBC and around 20% for P-TSAT. In conclusion, when diagnosing iron deficiency, calculating P-UIBC is a better way of using P-iron and P-TIBC than calculating P-TSAT.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"136-140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2026.2632315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transferrin saturation in plasma (P-TSAT) is 100 × P-iron/P-total iron binding capacity (P-TIBC). It is still used to diagnose iron deficiency, although P-ferritin is considered to be a better test. Both tests are sensitive to inflammation: P-TSAT decreases and P-ferritin increases. Unbound iron binding capacity in plasma (P-UIBC), which is P-TIBC minus P-iron, has a better diagnostic accuracy for iron deficiency than P-TSAT. However, how P-UIBC reacts in inflammation is less well known. We used cross-sectional data from 21681 patients to study how P-UIBC, P-TSAT, and P-ferritin varied with P-CRP. In a subpopulation of 8928 patients without inflammation (P-CRP ≤ 1 mg/L), we compared the diagnostic accuracy of P-TSAT and P-UIBC, using P-ferritin less than 15, 20, and 30 µg/L as reference standards for iron deficiency. We also estimated which values of P-UIBC and P-TSAT corresponded to a P-ferritin of 15, 20, and 30 µg/L. P-UIBC varied much less with P-CRP than did P-TSAT and P-ferritin. P-UIBC had better diagnostic accuracy than P-TSAT. Using P-ferritin < 20 µg/L as a reference standard, the areas under the ROC curves were 0.894 (95% confidence interval 0.883-0.905) for P-UIBC and 0.850 (0.836-0.864) for P-TSAT. At various ages, the values corresponding to a P-ferritin of 20 µg/L varied around 60 µmol/L for P-UIBC and around 20% for P-TSAT. In conclusion, when diagnosing iron deficiency, calculating P-UIBC is a better way of using P-iron and P-TIBC than calculating P-TSAT.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.