Association of CYP2C19 polymorphism with cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lupus Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-21 DOI:10.1177/09612033261429138
Azad Jha, Smriti Jha, Ganesh Chauhan
{"title":"Association of CYP2C19 polymorphism with cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Azad Jha, Smriti Jha, Ganesh Chauhan","doi":"10.1177/09612033261429138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCyclophosphamide (CYC) is a key immunosuppressive agent used for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). However, its use is often limited by variability in efficacy and toxicity, potentially influenced by genetic polymorphisms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between the CYP2C19 polymorphism and cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity in SLE and LN patients.MethodsLiterature search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated cyclophosphamide therapy in SLE or LN patients, assessed genetic polymorphisms, and reported toxicity outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance weighted fixed effect and random effect, publication bias was checked using funnel plot and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS E tool.ResultsOut of 1,713 identified articles, a total of 5 studies were eligible for meta-analysis which studied CYP2C19*2 genetic Polymorphism and CYC induced toxicity. It showed a significant association with protective effect (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.099-0.845, <i>p</i> = .021). Funnel plots suggested potential publication bias in CYP2C19*2 studies, while the risk of bias assessment revealed some concerns regarding confounding and outcome measurement.DiscussionThis meta-analysis supports the utility of CYP2C19*2 genotyping in predicting CYC induced toxicity in SLE and LN patients. Small sample sizes, confounding factors, and variability in outcome assessment were found to be the key limitations. Larger, multi ethnic studies with standardized toxicity assessments are recommended to validate these findings and explore these pharmacogenetic markers for optimizing CYC therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":18044,"journal":{"name":"Lupus","volume":" ","pages":"543-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lupus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09612033261429138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCyclophosphamide (CYC) is a key immunosuppressive agent used for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN). However, its use is often limited by variability in efficacy and toxicity, potentially influenced by genetic polymorphisms. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the association between the CYP2C19 polymorphism and cyclophosphamide-induced toxicity in SLE and LN patients.MethodsLiterature search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they evaluated cyclophosphamide therapy in SLE or LN patients, assessed genetic polymorphisms, and reported toxicity outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance weighted fixed effect and random effect, publication bias was checked using funnel plot and risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS E tool.ResultsOut of 1,713 identified articles, a total of 5 studies were eligible for meta-analysis which studied CYP2C19*2 genetic Polymorphism and CYC induced toxicity. It showed a significant association with protective effect (OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.099-0.845, p = .021). Funnel plots suggested potential publication bias in CYP2C19*2 studies, while the risk of bias assessment revealed some concerns regarding confounding and outcome measurement.DiscussionThis meta-analysis supports the utility of CYP2C19*2 genotyping in predicting CYC induced toxicity in SLE and LN patients. Small sample sizes, confounding factors, and variability in outcome assessment were found to be the key limitations. Larger, multi ethnic studies with standardized toxicity assessments are recommended to validate these findings and explore these pharmacogenetic markers for optimizing CYC therapy.

CYP2C19多态性与环磷酰胺诱导的系统性红斑狼疮和狼疮性肾炎毒性的关联:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
环磷酰胺(CYC)是一种用于治疗系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)和狼疮肾炎(LN)的关键免疫抑制剂。然而,它的使用往往受到效力和毒性的变化的限制,可能受到遗传多态性的影响。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估SLE和LN患者CYP2C19多态性与环磷酰胺诱导的毒性之间的关系。方法按照PRISMA指南使用PubMed和Web of Science数据库进行文献检索。如果研究评估环磷酰胺治疗SLE或LN患者,评估遗传多态性,并报告毒性结果,则纳入研究。meta分析采用反方差加权固定效应和随机效应,发表偏倚采用漏斗图检验,偏倚风险采用ROBINS E工具评估。结果在1713篇文献中,共有5篇研究CYP2C19*2基因多态性与CYC毒性的meta分析合格。与保护作用有显著相关性(OR = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.099 ~ 0.845, p = 0.021)。漏斗图提示CYP2C19*2研究存在潜在的发表偏倚,而偏倚风险评估显示在混杂和结局测量方面存在一些担忧。本荟萃分析支持CYP2C19*2基因分型在预测SLE和LN患者CYC诱导毒性中的效用。小样本量、混杂因素和结果评估的可变性被认为是主要的局限性。建议进行更大规模、多民族的标准化毒性评估研究,以验证这些发现,并探索这些药物遗传学标记物,以优化CYC治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lupus
Lupus 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
225
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The only fully peer reviewed international journal devoted exclusively to lupus (and related disease) research. Lupus includes the most promising new clinical and laboratory-based studies from leading specialists in all lupus-related disciplines. Invaluable reading, with extended coverage, lupus-related disciplines include: Rheumatology, Dermatology, Immunology, Obstetrics, Psychiatry and Cardiovascular Research…
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书