Influence of Multimodal AR-HUD Navigation Prompt Design on Driving Behavior at F-Type-5 M Intersections.

IF 2.8 4区 心理学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ziqi Liu, Zhengxing Yang, Yifan Du
{"title":"Influence of Multimodal AR-HUD Navigation Prompt Design on Driving Behavior at F-Type-5 M Intersections.","authors":"Ziqi Liu, Zhengxing Yang, Yifan Du","doi":"10.3390/jemr19010022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In complex urban traffic environments, the design of multimodal prompts in augmented reality head-up displays (AR-HUDs) plays a critical role in driving safety and operational efficiency. Despite growing interest in audiovisual navigation assistance, empirical evidence remains limited regarding when prompts should be delivered and whether visual and auditory information should remain temporally aligned. To address this gap, this study aims to examine how audiovisual prompt timing and prompt mode influence driving behavior in AR-HUD navigation systems at complex F-type-5 m intersections through a within-subject experimental design. A 2 (prompt mode: synchronized vs. asynchronous) × 3 (prompt timing: -1000 m, -600 m, -400 m) design was employed to assess driver response time, situational awareness, and eye-movement measures, including average fixation duration and fixation count. The results showed clear main effects of both prompt mode and prompt timing. Compared with asynchronous prompts, synchronized prompts consistently resulted in shorter response times, reduced visual demand, and higher situational awareness. Driving performance also improved as prompt timing shifted closer to the intersection, from -1000 m to -400 m. But no significant interaction effects were found, suggesting that prompt mode and prompt timing can be treated as relatively independent design factors. In addition, among the six experimental conditions, the -400 m synchronized condition yielded the most favorable overall performance, whereas the -1000 m asynchronous condition performed worst. These findings indicate that in time-critical and low-tolerance scenarios, such as F-type-5 m intersections, near-distance synchronized multimodal prompts should be prioritized. This study provides empirical support for optimizing prompt timing and cross-modal temporal alignment in AR-HUD systems and offers actionable implications for interface and timing design.</p>","PeriodicalId":15813,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12921726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Eye Movement Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19010022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In complex urban traffic environments, the design of multimodal prompts in augmented reality head-up displays (AR-HUDs) plays a critical role in driving safety and operational efficiency. Despite growing interest in audiovisual navigation assistance, empirical evidence remains limited regarding when prompts should be delivered and whether visual and auditory information should remain temporally aligned. To address this gap, this study aims to examine how audiovisual prompt timing and prompt mode influence driving behavior in AR-HUD navigation systems at complex F-type-5 m intersections through a within-subject experimental design. A 2 (prompt mode: synchronized vs. asynchronous) × 3 (prompt timing: -1000 m, -600 m, -400 m) design was employed to assess driver response time, situational awareness, and eye-movement measures, including average fixation duration and fixation count. The results showed clear main effects of both prompt mode and prompt timing. Compared with asynchronous prompts, synchronized prompts consistently resulted in shorter response times, reduced visual demand, and higher situational awareness. Driving performance also improved as prompt timing shifted closer to the intersection, from -1000 m to -400 m. But no significant interaction effects were found, suggesting that prompt mode and prompt timing can be treated as relatively independent design factors. In addition, among the six experimental conditions, the -400 m synchronized condition yielded the most favorable overall performance, whereas the -1000 m asynchronous condition performed worst. These findings indicate that in time-critical and low-tolerance scenarios, such as F-type-5 m intersections, near-distance synchronized multimodal prompts should be prioritized. This study provides empirical support for optimizing prompt timing and cross-modal temporal alignment in AR-HUD systems and offers actionable implications for interface and timing design.

多模态AR-HUD导航提示设计对f -5 M交叉口驾驶行为的影响
在复杂的城市交通环境中,增强现实平视显示器(ar - hud)的多模式提示设计对驾驶安全和运行效率起着至关重要的作用。尽管人们对视听导航辅助越来越感兴趣,但关于何时应提供提示以及视觉和听觉信息是否应暂时保持一致的经验证据仍然有限。为了解决这一差距,本研究旨在通过受试者内实验设计,研究视听提示时间和提示模式如何影响AR-HUD导航系统在复杂的f型5米路口的驾驶行为。采用2(提示模式:同步与异步)× 3(提示时间:-1000 m、-600 m、-400 m)设计评估驾驶员反应时间、态势感知和眼动测量,包括平均注视时间和注视次数。结果表明,提示方式和提示时间的主要作用都很明显。与异步提示相比,同步提示始终导致更短的响应时间、更少的视觉需求和更高的态势感知。随着提示时间从-1000米转向-400米,驾驶性能也有所提高。但没有发现显著的交互效应,提示模式和提示时间可以作为相对独立的设计因素。此外,在6个实验条件中,-400 m同步条件的综合性能最好,而-1000 m异步条件的综合性能最差。这些发现表明,在时间紧迫和低容忍度的情况下,如f型5米路口,应优先考虑近距离同步多模式提示。本研究为优化AR-HUD系统的提示时间和跨模态时间对齐提供了实证支持,并为界面和时间设计提供了可操作的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Eye Movement Research is an open-access, peer-reviewed scientific periodical devoted to all aspects of oculomotor functioning including methodology of eye recording, neurophysiological and cognitive models, attention, reading, as well as applications in neurology, ergonomy, media research and other areas,
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书