Development of an Advance Care Planning Pilot Module for New York City Community Members.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1007/s10900-026-01561-2
Sabina Kubayeva, Tyler M Johnson, Nathalie Vieux-Gresham, Alison Snow, Lina Jandorf
{"title":"Development of an Advance Care Planning Pilot Module for New York City Community Members.","authors":"Sabina Kubayeva, Tyler M Johnson, Nathalie Vieux-Gresham, Alison Snow, Lina Jandorf","doi":"10.1007/s10900-026-01561-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advance care planning (ACP) facilitates discussions about future healthcare decisions to ensure alignment with individuals' values, goals, and medical preferences. Despite its benefits, ACP engagement and completion of advance directives (AD) remain limited due to low awareness, misconceptions, and structural barriers. The Tisch Cancer Institute Community Outreach and Engagement Department at Mount Sinai in New York City (NYC) identified this knowledge gap as a key community need. In response, a community-based educational module was created to enhance ACP and AD knowledge. Curriculum development was informed by a literature review and collaboration with health educators, social workers, and palliative care specialists. The intervention included a 30-minute slideshow, a two-page glossary and resource handout, and a healthcare proxy AD form. Workshop impact, acceptability, and feedback were assessed using a validated survey with eight Likert-scale items and two open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative responses, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended feedback. Community adult members across NYC participated in eleven workshops held at diverse community sites from June 2024 to June 2025, engaging 141 individuals with a feedback survey response rate of approximately 40% (N = 56). Findings demonstrated acceptability and feasibility. Participants reported increased understanding of ACP concepts and improved confidence in completing ADs. Qualitative comments emphasized clarity, relevance, and practicality of materials. Our community-based educational workshops effectively enhanced ACP knowledge and empowered participants in healthcare decision-making. Future directions include expanding workshop reach, translating materials, and conducting longitudinal follow-up to evaluate sustained engagement and impact on AD completion rates over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"413-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-026-01561-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advance care planning (ACP) facilitates discussions about future healthcare decisions to ensure alignment with individuals' values, goals, and medical preferences. Despite its benefits, ACP engagement and completion of advance directives (AD) remain limited due to low awareness, misconceptions, and structural barriers. The Tisch Cancer Institute Community Outreach and Engagement Department at Mount Sinai in New York City (NYC) identified this knowledge gap as a key community need. In response, a community-based educational module was created to enhance ACP and AD knowledge. Curriculum development was informed by a literature review and collaboration with health educators, social workers, and palliative care specialists. The intervention included a 30-minute slideshow, a two-page glossary and resource handout, and a healthcare proxy AD form. Workshop impact, acceptability, and feedback were assessed using a validated survey with eight Likert-scale items and two open-ended questions. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative responses, and thematic analysis was applied to open-ended feedback. Community adult members across NYC participated in eleven workshops held at diverse community sites from June 2024 to June 2025, engaging 141 individuals with a feedback survey response rate of approximately 40% (N = 56). Findings demonstrated acceptability and feasibility. Participants reported increased understanding of ACP concepts and improved confidence in completing ADs. Qualitative comments emphasized clarity, relevance, and practicality of materials. Our community-based educational workshops effectively enhanced ACP knowledge and empowered participants in healthcare decision-making. Future directions include expanding workshop reach, translating materials, and conducting longitudinal follow-up to evaluate sustained engagement and impact on AD completion rates over time.

纽约市社区成员预先护理计划试点模块的开发。
预先护理计划(ACP)促进对未来医疗保健决策的讨论,以确保与个人价值观、目标和医疗偏好保持一致。尽管有很多好处,但由于意识不足、误解和结构性障碍,ACP参与和完成预先指示(AD)仍然有限。纽约市西奈山的Tisch癌症研究所社区外展和参与部门将这一知识差距确定为关键的社区需求。为此,建立了一个以社区为基础的教育模块,以提高ACP和AD的知识。课程的制定是通过文献综述和与卫生教育工作者、社会工作者和姑息治疗专家的合作。干预措施包括30分钟的幻灯片,两页的词汇表和资源讲义,以及医疗代理广告表单。研讨会的影响、可接受性和反馈是通过一个有八个李克特量表项目和两个开放式问题的有效调查来评估的。描述性统计总结了定量反馈,主题分析应用于开放式反馈。从2024年6月到2025年6月,纽约市各地的社区成人成员参加了在不同社区地点举行的11次研讨会,共有141人参与,反馈调查的回复率约为40% (N = 56)。结果证明了可接受性和可行性。参与者报告说,他们对ACP概念的理解增加了,完成ADs的信心也提高了。定性评价强调了材料的清晰度、相关性和实用性。我们以社区为基础的教育讲习班有效地增进了ACP的知识,并赋予参与者参与医疗保健决策的权力。未来的方向包括扩大工作坊范围,翻译材料,并进行纵向随访,以评估持续参与和AD完成率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书