Feeding of Different Levels of Synbiotics to Suckling Lambs: Effects on Intake, Digestibility, Performance, Parameters of Rumen, Blood and Health, and Skeletal Growth.

IF 2.8 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-20 DOI:10.1111/jpn.70044
Seyedah Somayye Fathi Fazli, Mohammad Mahdi Sharifi Hosseini, Mohammad Amin Khazri, Omid Dayani, Massoud Asadi Fouzi
{"title":"Feeding of Different Levels of Synbiotics to Suckling Lambs: Effects on Intake, Digestibility, Performance, Parameters of Rumen, Blood and Health, and Skeletal Growth.","authors":"Seyedah Somayye Fathi Fazli, Mohammad Mahdi Sharifi Hosseini, Mohammad Amin Khazri, Omid Dayani, Massoud Asadi Fouzi","doi":"10.1111/jpn.70044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to investigate the effects of varying levels of synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics) on the performance and health parameters of 28 Afshari lambs over a period of 90 days. The average weight of lambs was of 10 ± 0.2 kg and an age of approximately 1 month. The prebiotic supplement included mannan oligosaccharide and beta-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast, along with a probiotic comprising seven bacterial strains, and used at concentration of 2 × 109/g cfu. A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed in a completely randomized design, with the factors being the levels of probiotic supplementation (1.0 g and 2.0 g) and prebiotic supplementation (1.5 g and 3.0 g). The interaction effect of probiotic and prebiotic was significant on dry matter intake (p < 0.01), digestibility (p < 0.01), total white blood cell (p < 0.05) and Improved feed conversion ratio (p < 0.01). These effects were higher at treatment of high levels of probiotic (2 grams) and prebiotic (3 grams). The higher levels of probiotic significantly influenced on biometric parameters such as heart girth and withers height (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Higher levels of probiotic and prebiotic supplementation had a positive impact on total white blood cell, and monocytes counts. The high level of synbiotic supplementation resulted in a significant increase in total blood protein concentration and glucose levels, with the differences being statistically significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Additionally, the decrease in ruminal NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration with higher level probiotic compare to low level (8.69 vs 7.08 mg/dl) indicates improved rumen nitrogen utilization and potentially better rumen health. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of high levels of synbiotics to improve growth performance, nutrient digestion, and health outcomes in suckling lambs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"377-387"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.70044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effects of varying levels of synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics) on the performance and health parameters of 28 Afshari lambs over a period of 90 days. The average weight of lambs was of 10 ± 0.2 kg and an age of approximately 1 month. The prebiotic supplement included mannan oligosaccharide and beta-glucan from Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast, along with a probiotic comprising seven bacterial strains, and used at concentration of 2 × 109/g cfu. A 2 × 2 factorial design was employed in a completely randomized design, with the factors being the levels of probiotic supplementation (1.0 g and 2.0 g) and prebiotic supplementation (1.5 g and 3.0 g). The interaction effect of probiotic and prebiotic was significant on dry matter intake (p < 0.01), digestibility (p < 0.01), total white blood cell (p < 0.05) and Improved feed conversion ratio (p < 0.01). These effects were higher at treatment of high levels of probiotic (2 grams) and prebiotic (3 grams). The higher levels of probiotic significantly influenced on biometric parameters such as heart girth and withers height (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Higher levels of probiotic and prebiotic supplementation had a positive impact on total white blood cell, and monocytes counts. The high level of synbiotic supplementation resulted in a significant increase in total blood protein concentration and glucose levels, with the differences being statistically significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. Additionally, the decrease in ruminal NH3-N concentration with higher level probiotic compare to low level (8.69 vs 7.08 mg/dl) indicates improved rumen nitrogen utilization and potentially better rumen health. Overall, these findings highlight the potential of high levels of synbiotics to improve growth performance, nutrient digestion, and health outcomes in suckling lambs.

饲喂不同水平合成制剂对哺乳羔羊采食量、消化率、生产性能、瘤胃、血液和健康指标及骨骼生长的影响
本研究旨在研究不同水平的益生菌(益生菌和益生元的组合)对28只阿夫沙里羔羊90天内生产性能和健康参数的影响。羔羊平均体重为10±0.2 kg,月龄约1个月。该益生元补充剂包括来自酿酒酵母的甘露寡糖和β -葡聚糖,以及由7个菌株组成的益生菌,浓度为2 × 109/g cfu。采用完全随机设计,采用2 × 2因子设计,影响因素为益生菌添加水平(1.0 g和2.0 g)和益生元添加水平(1.5 g和3.0 g)。益生菌和益生元对干物质采食量的互作效应显著(与低水平(8.69 mg/dl vs 7.08 mg/dl)相比,高水平益生菌的p - 3-N浓度提高了瘤胃氮利用率,可能改善了瘤胃健康。总的来说,这些发现强调了高水平的合成制剂在改善哺乳羔羊生长性能、营养物质消化和健康结果方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As an international forum for hypothesis-driven scientific research, the Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition publishes original papers in the fields of animal physiology, biochemistry and physiology of nutrition, animal nutrition, feed technology and preservation (only when related to animal nutrition). Well-conducted scientific work that meets the technical and ethical standards is considered only on the basis of scientific rigor. Research on farm and companion animals is preferred. Comparative work on exotic species is welcome too. Pharmacological or toxicological experiments with a direct reference to nutrition are also considered. Manuscripts on fish and other aquatic non-mammals with topics on growth or nutrition will not be accepted. Manuscripts may be rejected on the grounds that the subject is too specialized or that the contribution they make to animal physiology and nutrition is insufficient. In addition, reviews on topics of current interest within the scope of the journal are welcome. Authors are advised to send an outline to the Editorial Office for approval prior to submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书