Sensitivity and Specificity of Atropine Injection for Testing for Irreversible Loss of Brain Function: Experiences From 394 Examinations

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frank Logemann, Carl D. Reimers
{"title":"Sensitivity and Specificity of Atropine Injection for Testing for Irreversible Loss of Brain Function: Experiences From 394 Examinations","authors":"Frank Logemann,&nbsp;Carl D. Reimers","doi":"10.1155/ane/2583072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Testing for brain death/death by neurologic criteria includes proof of irreversible loss of all brain functions. Intravenously administered atropine can serve as a complementary clinical test. This study determines the cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity of the atropine test and examines implications for the safety of existing scientific guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A prospective multicenter observational study included patients who received atropine (2 mg intravenously) as part of an investigation for brain death/death by neurologic criteria. Data from brain death/death by neurologic criteria protocols, vital signs records, and diagnostic reports were collected in order to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the atropine test per se and in comparison to the standard tests.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The study included 394 examinations in 257 patients (51.6 years, SD 16.3 years, 123 men, and 134 women) with suspected brain death/death by neurologic criteria.</p>\n \n <p>In brain-dead patients, there was no increase in heart rate above 10 bpm (i.e., specificity of 100% of a positive atropine test &gt; 10 bpm). Although of low sensitivity (17%) in proving residual brain function, the atropine test is twice as sensitive in revealing remaining brain functions as mandatory clinical tests (corneal, cough, and pupillary reflex <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05, apnea test and unresponsiveness to pain <i>p</i> &lt; 0.10).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A cut-off value of 10 bpm achieves very good specificity, but only low sensitivity. However, the sensitivity of the atropine test was more than twice as high as that of all mandatory tests. Therefore, we suggest considering the simple atropine test in brain death/death by neurologic criteria diagnostics at least where brain perfusion investigations are not used.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":6939,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/ane/2583072","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/ane/2583072","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Testing for brain death/death by neurologic criteria includes proof of irreversible loss of all brain functions. Intravenously administered atropine can serve as a complementary clinical test. This study determines the cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity of the atropine test and examines implications for the safety of existing scientific guidelines.

Methods

A prospective multicenter observational study included patients who received atropine (2 mg intravenously) as part of an investigation for brain death/death by neurologic criteria. Data from brain death/death by neurologic criteria protocols, vital signs records, and diagnostic reports were collected in order to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of the atropine test per se and in comparison to the standard tests.

Results

The study included 394 examinations in 257 patients (51.6 years, SD 16.3 years, 123 men, and 134 women) with suspected brain death/death by neurologic criteria.

In brain-dead patients, there was no increase in heart rate above 10 bpm (i.e., specificity of 100% of a positive atropine test > 10 bpm). Although of low sensitivity (17%) in proving residual brain function, the atropine test is twice as sensitive in revealing remaining brain functions as mandatory clinical tests (corneal, cough, and pupillary reflex p < 0.05, apnea test and unresponsiveness to pain p < 0.10).

Conclusion

A cut-off value of 10 bpm achieves very good specificity, but only low sensitivity. However, the sensitivity of the atropine test was more than twice as high as that of all mandatory tests. Therefore, we suggest considering the simple atropine test in brain death/death by neurologic criteria diagnostics at least where brain perfusion investigations are not used.

Abstract Image

阿托品注射液检测不可逆性脑功能丧失的敏感性和特异性:来自394例检查的经验
目的根据神经学标准对脑死亡/死亡的检测包括证明所有脑功能不可逆转的丧失。静脉注射阿托品可作为补充临床试验。本研究确定了阿托品试验的临界值、敏感性和特异性,并检查了现有科学指南的安全性。方法一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究纳入了接受阿托品(静脉注射2mg)治疗的患者,作为神经学标准脑死亡/死亡调查的一部分。收集脑死亡/死亡的神经学标准协议、生命体征记录和诊断报告的数据,以计算阿托品试验本身的敏感性和特异性,并与标准试验进行比较。结果该研究纳入了257例(51.6岁,SD 16.3岁,123名男性,134名女性)疑似脑死亡/神经学标准死亡的患者的394项检查。在脑死亡患者中,心率没有高于10bpm的增加(即阿托品试验阳性的100%特异性为10bpm)。虽然阿托品试验在检测残余脑功能方面的灵敏度较低(17%),但在检测残余脑功能方面,阿托品试验的灵敏度是强制性临床试验(角膜、咳嗽和瞳孔反射p <; 0.05,呼吸暂停试验和对疼痛无反应p <; 0.10)的两倍。结论截断值10bpm具有很好的特异性,但敏感性较低。然而,阿托品试验的灵敏度是所有强制性试验的两倍多。因此,我们建议至少在不使用脑灌注检查的情况下,考虑用简单的阿托品试验进行脑死亡/死亡的神经学标准诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica aims to publish manuscripts of a high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work in neuroscience. The journal''s scope is to act as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science or practice of this subject area. Papers in English will be welcomed, especially those which bring new knowledge and observations from the application of therapies or techniques in the combating of a broad spectrum of neurological disease and neurodegenerative disorders. Relevant articles on the basic neurosciences will be published where they extend present understanding of such disorders. Priority will be given to review of topical subjects. Papers requiring rapid publication because of their significance and timeliness will be included as ''Clinical commentaries'' not exceeding two printed pages, as will ''Clinical commentaries'' of sufficient general interest. Debate within the speciality is encouraged in the form of ''Letters to the editor''. All submitted manuscripts falling within the overall scope of the journal will be assessed by suitably qualified referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书