Evaluation of a quantitative method for measuring the spatial resolution of a gamma camera using a bar phantom

IF 4.7 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-18 DOI:10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.02.004
Jule Maack, Christian Schütze
{"title":"Evaluation of a quantitative method for measuring the spatial resolution of a gamma camera using a bar phantom","authors":"Jule Maack,&nbsp;Christian Schütze","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2026.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The method developed by Hander et al. (1997) [1] enables a quantitative determination of spatial resolution by analysing planar images of a lead bar phantom. The method is based on the determination of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) solely on the basis of the mean value and standard deviation within a region of interest (ROI). To assess the applicability of this method for constancy checks with extrinsic measurements, the influence of the phantom-to-collimator distance, the total counts and the matrix size was evaluated. In addition, the constancy of the method for repeated measurements under repositioning was analysed.</div><div>The phantom-to-collimator distance significantly affects the determined resolution, with the <em>FWHM</em> increasing by approximately 0.4 mm per centimetre of distance. The matrix size also influences the determined values, leading to up to 20% lower <em>MTF</em> values for the larger bars (4 and 5 mm) when decreasing the matrix from a 1024 × 1024 to a 256 × 256 matrix. The total number of counts does not affect the <em>MTF</em> or <em>FWHM</em> values, provided that at least 3·10<sup>6</sup> counts are acquired. However, this applies only to the larger bars (4 and 5 mm); if reliable values are required for all four quadrants, the total number of counts should be increased further. Under constant measurement conditions, variations below 2.4% were observed for the bars of 4 and 5 mm width. For the smaller bars of 2 and 3 mm width the variations were below 9%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":"36 3","pages":"Pages 376-380"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388926000115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method developed by Hander et al. (1997) [1] enables a quantitative determination of spatial resolution by analysing planar images of a lead bar phantom. The method is based on the determination of the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) solely on the basis of the mean value and standard deviation within a region of interest (ROI). To assess the applicability of this method for constancy checks with extrinsic measurements, the influence of the phantom-to-collimator distance, the total counts and the matrix size was evaluated. In addition, the constancy of the method for repeated measurements under repositioning was analysed.
The phantom-to-collimator distance significantly affects the determined resolution, with the FWHM increasing by approximately 0.4 mm per centimetre of distance. The matrix size also influences the determined values, leading to up to 20% lower MTF values for the larger bars (4 and 5 mm) when decreasing the matrix from a 1024 × 1024 to a 256 × 256 matrix. The total number of counts does not affect the MTF or FWHM values, provided that at least 3·106 counts are acquired. However, this applies only to the larger bars (4 and 5 mm); if reliable values are required for all four quadrants, the total number of counts should be increased further. Under constant measurement conditions, variations below 2.4% were observed for the bars of 4 and 5 mm width. For the smaller bars of 2 and 3 mm width the variations were below 9%.
评价一种使用条形体测量伽马相机空间分辨率的定量方法。
Hander等人(1997)开发的方法可以通过分析铅条模体的平面图像来定量确定空间分辨率。该方法仅基于感兴趣区域(ROI)内的平均值和标准差来确定调制传递函数(MTF)和半最大值全宽度(FWHM)。为了评估该方法在具有外部测量的恒常性检查中的适用性,评估了幻影到准直器距离、总数和矩阵大小的影响。此外,还分析了该方法在重定位条件下重复测量的稳定性。幻影到准直器的距离显著影响确定的分辨率,FWHM每厘米距离增加约0.4毫米。矩阵尺寸也会影响确定的值,当将矩阵从1024 × 1024减小到256 × 256矩阵时,导致较大条(4和5 mm)的MTF值降低20%。如果至少获得3.106次计数,则计数总数不影响MTF或FWHM值。然而,这只适用于较大的杆(4和5毫米);如果所有四个象限都需要可靠的值,则计数总数应进一步增加。在恒定的测量条件下,宽度为4和5 mm的棒材的变化小于2.4%。对于2和3毫米宽的小棒材,变化小于9%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书