Renata Grazziotin, Ryan Li, Thiago Ardenghi, Diego M. Ardenghi
{"title":"Accuracy of a 3D Intraoral Scanner in Endodontics","authors":"Renata Grazziotin, Ryan Li, Thiago Ardenghi, Diego M. Ardenghi","doi":"10.1111/aej.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study measured the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) in examining endodontic access openings. The method was compared to the clinical microscope and CBCT. Primescan scanned the pulp chambers of 24 extracted molars shortly after access, and the computer-3D models were inspected to document the orifices (number; location) and chamber features (calcifications; defects originated during access; anatomical variations). Scanner agreement to identify the orifices′ number and location was non-significant in relation to both the microscope and CBCT; considered, therefore, accurate. It was also accurate to show defects (bur abrasion) and/or anatomical features (isthmus) in the chamber floor, with diagnostic accuracy estimated in 87.5% (95% CI: 67.6–97.3) in relation to the microscope. Scanner diagnostic accuracy to show calcified orifices was estimated in 79.2% (95% CI: 57.8–92.9) in relation to the microscope, and 70.8% (95% CI: 48.9–87.4) in relation to the CBCT, considered, then, of moderate accuracy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":"52 2","pages":"431-438"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.70065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study measured the accuracy of an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona, Charlotte, NC, USA) in examining endodontic access openings. The method was compared to the clinical microscope and CBCT. Primescan scanned the pulp chambers of 24 extracted molars shortly after access, and the computer-3D models were inspected to document the orifices (number; location) and chamber features (calcifications; defects originated during access; anatomical variations). Scanner agreement to identify the orifices′ number and location was non-significant in relation to both the microscope and CBCT; considered, therefore, accurate. It was also accurate to show defects (bur abrasion) and/or anatomical features (isthmus) in the chamber floor, with diagnostic accuracy estimated in 87.5% (95% CI: 67.6–97.3) in relation to the microscope. Scanner diagnostic accuracy to show calcified orifices was estimated in 79.2% (95% CI: 57.8–92.9) in relation to the microscope, and 70.8% (95% CI: 48.9–87.4) in relation to the CBCT, considered, then, of moderate accuracy.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues.
The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses.
The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.