Influence of psychological and somatosensory characteristics on treatment outcomes in adolescent chronic postsurgical and primary pain.

IF 4.3 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2026-02-17 eCollection Date: 2026-04-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001408
Lisa M Einhorn, Andrew M Breglio, Thomas Wise, Morgan Rosser, Don Daniel Ocay, Nada Mohamed, Pablo Ingelmo
{"title":"Influence of psychological and somatosensory characteristics on treatment outcomes in adolescent chronic postsurgical and primary pain.","authors":"Lisa M Einhorn, Andrew M Breglio, Thomas Wise, Morgan Rosser, Don Daniel Ocay, Nada Mohamed, Pablo Ingelmo","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects 20% to 30% of pediatric patients at 12 months after surgery. We hypothesized that differences in biopsychosocial and somatosensory profiles exist between patients with CPSP and those with chronic primary pain (CPP) and that these differences affect treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort included prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from adolescents treated at the Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain between May 2016 and May 2022. During clinic intake, patients completed the Functional Disability Inventory, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess for disability, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, respectively. Baseline quantitative sensory testing/conditioned pain modulation (QST/CPM) was performed to characterize somatosensory functioning. The primary outcome was a score of 6 (\"much better\") or 7 (\"very much better\") on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measure at treatment end.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 99 patients (14.8 ± 2.0 years, 90% female), 46 had CPSP and 53 had CPP. Compared to CPP, patients with CPSP had less baseline functional disability, coexisting depression, and social phobia and better sleep quality. After adjusting for psychosocial differences, patients with CPSP were more likely to score ≥6 on PGIC than patients with CPP (odds ratio = 3.0 [95% confidential interval: 1.3-7.7], <i>P</i> = 0.01). Patients with dynamic mechanical allodynia and/or temporal summation were less likely to score ≥6 on PGIC compared to patients without (odds ratio = 0.33 [95% confidential interval: 0.13-0.82], <i>P</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Differences in biopsychosocial factors, somatosensory profiles, and treatment outcomes exist between patients with CPSP and CPP. The presence of centrally driven pain hypersensitivity on baseline QST/CPM was associated with worse recovery prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":"11 2","pages":"e1408"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12915702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) affects 20% to 30% of pediatric patients at 12 months after surgery. We hypothesized that differences in biopsychosocial and somatosensory profiles exist between patients with CPSP and those with chronic primary pain (CPP) and that these differences affect treatment outcomes.

Methods: This cohort included prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from adolescents treated at the Edwards Family Interdisciplinary Center for Complex Pain between May 2016 and May 2022. During clinic intake, patients completed the Functional Disability Inventory, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess for disability, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality, respectively. Baseline quantitative sensory testing/conditioned pain modulation (QST/CPM) was performed to characterize somatosensory functioning. The primary outcome was a score of 6 ("much better") or 7 ("very much better") on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) measure at treatment end.

Results: Of 99 patients (14.8 ± 2.0 years, 90% female), 46 had CPSP and 53 had CPP. Compared to CPP, patients with CPSP had less baseline functional disability, coexisting depression, and social phobia and better sleep quality. After adjusting for psychosocial differences, patients with CPSP were more likely to score ≥6 on PGIC than patients with CPP (odds ratio = 3.0 [95% confidential interval: 1.3-7.7], P = 0.01). Patients with dynamic mechanical allodynia and/or temporal summation were less likely to score ≥6 on PGIC compared to patients without (odds ratio = 0.33 [95% confidential interval: 0.13-0.82], P = 0.02).

Conclusion: Differences in biopsychosocial factors, somatosensory profiles, and treatment outcomes exist between patients with CPSP and CPP. The presence of centrally driven pain hypersensitivity on baseline QST/CPM was associated with worse recovery prognosis.

心理和体感特征对青少年慢性术后和原发性疼痛治疗效果的影响。
慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)影响20%至30%的儿科患者在术后12个月。我们假设CPSP患者和慢性原发性疼痛(CPP)患者在生物、心理、社会和躯体感觉方面存在差异,这些差异会影响治疗结果。方法:该队列包括2016年5月至2022年5月期间在爱德华兹家庭复杂疼痛跨学科中心接受治疗的青少年的前瞻性收集和回顾性分析数据。门诊入院时,患者分别填写功能障碍量表、修订儿童焦虑抑郁量表和匹兹堡睡眠质量指数,评估残疾、焦虑、抑郁和睡眠质量。进行基线定量感觉测试/条件性疼痛调节(QST/CPM)来表征体感觉功能。主要结果是治疗结束时患者整体变化印象(PGIC)得分为6分(“好得多”)或7分(“好得多”)。结果:99例患者(14.8±2.0岁,女性90%),CPSP 46例,CPP 53例。与CPP相比,CPSP患者的基线功能障碍、共存抑郁和社交恐惧症较少,睡眠质量更好。在调整心理社会差异后,CPSP患者的PGIC得分≥6分的可能性高于CPP患者(优势比= 3.0[95%可信区间:1.3-7.7],P = 0.01)。与无PGIC评分≥6分的患者相比,有动态机械异常性痛和/或时间累加的患者更少(优势比= 0.33[95%可信区间:0.13-0.82],P = 0.02)。结论:CPSP和CPP患者在生物心理社会因素、体感觉特征和治疗效果方面存在差异。基线QST/CPM中枢性疼痛超敏反应的存在与较差的恢复预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书