Sex-Specific Contributions to Single- and Dual-Task Walking in Adults at Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nick W Bray, David A C Adriano, Sofia Grant, Karen D Kendall, Michael D Hill, R Stewart Longman, Aishah Alhmoudi Matar, Naif Alghasab, Nabila Mahdi, Elnaz Ehteshami Afshar, G Bruce Pike, Marc J Poulin, Gail A Eskes
{"title":"Sex-Specific Contributions to Single- and Dual-Task Walking in Adults at Risk of Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.","authors":"Nick W Bray, David A C Adriano, Sofia Grant, Karen D Kendall, Michael D Hill, R Stewart Longman, Aishah Alhmoudi Matar, Naif Alghasab, Nabila Mahdi, Elnaz Ehteshami Afshar, G Bruce Pike, Marc J Poulin, Gail A Eskes","doi":"10.1123/japa.2025-0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Walking reflects a complex interaction between physiological systems that deteriorate with age and do so more rapidly in those living with diseases. We conducted a sex-specific cross-sectional analysis to determine the contribution of modifiable (risk) factors to single- and dual-task gait performance in older adults at risk of Alzheimer disease and related dementias.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included participants (n = 103; 60.4% female; mean age 63.7 ± 6.2) who had completed a preintervention assessment for a randomized controlled trial. We used the following factors in hierarchical regressions while controlling for age, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and global cognition. Participants walked at their usual pace on an electronic walkway and completed the two-back version of the n-back test either separately or together.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Males and females demonstrated reduced gait speed when comparing single to dual tasking (p < .001), but only females demonstrated increasing (i.e., worse) gait variability (p = .007). In females, the dual-task velocity model was significant, F(3, 56) = 5.173, with muscle strength (p = .006) and cardiorespiratory fitness (p = .049) contributing significantly. For males, the models were significant across all conditions, but muscle strength was the only significant (modifiable) factor (single task, p = .023; dual task, p = .046).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dual-task gait velocity is associated with a combination of modifiable factors. However, the importance of each factor differs between males and females. Significance/Implications: Such findings have implications for understanding gait decline and potential sex-specific intervention strategies in those at risk of Alzheimer disease and related dementias.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2025-0148","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Walking reflects a complex interaction between physiological systems that deteriorate with age and do so more rapidly in those living with diseases. We conducted a sex-specific cross-sectional analysis to determine the contribution of modifiable (risk) factors to single- and dual-task gait performance in older adults at risk of Alzheimer disease and related dementias.

Methods: We included participants (n = 103; 60.4% female; mean age 63.7 ± 6.2) who had completed a preintervention assessment for a randomized controlled trial. We used the following factors in hierarchical regressions while controlling for age, muscle strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and global cognition. Participants walked at their usual pace on an electronic walkway and completed the two-back version of the n-back test either separately or together.

Results: Males and females demonstrated reduced gait speed when comparing single to dual tasking (p < .001), but only females demonstrated increasing (i.e., worse) gait variability (p = .007). In females, the dual-task velocity model was significant, F(3, 56) = 5.173, with muscle strength (p = .006) and cardiorespiratory fitness (p = .049) contributing significantly. For males, the models were significant across all conditions, but muscle strength was the only significant (modifiable) factor (single task, p = .023; dual task, p = .046).

Conclusion: Dual-task gait velocity is associated with a combination of modifiable factors. However, the importance of each factor differs between males and females. Significance/Implications: Such findings have implications for understanding gait decline and potential sex-specific intervention strategies in those at risk of Alzheimer disease and related dementias.

阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险的成人单任务和双任务行走的性别特异性贡献
背景/目的:行走反映了生理系统之间复杂的相互作用,这些生理系统随着年龄的增长而恶化,并且在患有疾病的人群中恶化得更快。我们进行了一项性别特异性横断面分析,以确定有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险的老年人单任务和双任务步态表现的可改变(风险)因素的贡献。方法:我们纳入了完成干预前评估的随机对照试验参与者(n = 103, 60.4%为女性,平均年龄63.7±6.2)。在控制年龄、肌肉力量、心肺健康和整体认知的同时,我们在分层回归中使用了以下因素。参与者在电子通道上以正常的速度行走,并分别或一起完成n-back测试的双背版本。结果:与单任务和双任务相比,男性和女性表现出步态速度降低(p < .001),但只有女性表现出步态变异性增加(即更差)(p = .007)。女性双任务速度模型显著,F(3,56) = 5.173,肌肉力量(p = 0.006)和心肺健康(p = 0.049)对双任务速度模型有显著影响。对于男性,这些模型在所有条件下都是显著的,但肌肉力量是唯一显著的(可修改的)因素(单任务,p = 0.023;双任务,p = 0.046)。结论:双任务步态速度与多种可变因素有关。然而,每个因素的重要性在男性和女性之间是不同的。意义/启示:这些发现有助于理解阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆风险人群的步态下降和潜在的性别特异性干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书