"Tough Things You're Going to Have to Go Through": Dyadic Interview Study Including the Perspectives and Needs of Patients and Their Caregivers Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.

Q2 Medicine
Amanda Johnson, Eleanor Smeallie, Chloe Roslin, Michelle Rozwadowski, Evan Shereck, Sung Won Choi
{"title":"\"Tough Things You're Going to Have to Go Through\": Dyadic Interview Study Including the Perspectives and Needs of Patients and Their Caregivers Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplant.","authors":"Amanda Johnson, Eleanor Smeallie, Chloe Roslin, Michelle Rozwadowski, Evan Shereck, Sung Won Choi","doi":"10.2196/81971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and their caregivers are under a significant amount of stress throughout the HCT process with fear of disease recurrence, graft failure, and many other HCT-related complications. However, the needs and perspectives of patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers as dyadic units over the peri-HCT period are continuing to be studied and are an evolving field of research.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To better understand patient and caregiver perspectives throughout the HCT course, patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were able to opt-in to interviews at multiple time points post-HCT as part of a larger study, Roadmap 2.0 (an app intervention trial to support caregivers of patients undergoing HCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semistructured, dyadic (patient and caregiver) interviews took place around hospital discharge, day +30, +60, +90 and +120 post-HCT. Patient and caregiver discussions at each interview centered around a variety of topics including desired post-HCT information, coping, and additional resources for patients and their caregivers with the goal of gathering feedback to better inform future studies after Roadmap 2.0 and better understand the needs and perspectives of patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers. Interviews were transcribed and double-coded with inductive and deductive content analysis using the framework method to identify key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 10 patient-caregiver dyads participated, resulting in 48 dyadic interviews (1 patient died). Multiple findings emerged out of these rich discussions, including the progression from immediately post-discharge to when patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were further out from HCT. The progression was as follows: \"desire for data and tracking\" to \"need for specific restrictions and outline on forward progress,\" to \"need for additional directed information as progressing forward,\" to \"bigger picture and getting back to life,\" and concluding with \"reflection and fear.\" Most patients and caregivers felt they were provided sufficient general anticipatory guidance throughout the HCT process but called for more specific expectations and guidance on a variety of issues. Many patients and caregivers used multiple coping strategies during HCT, with their coping strategies largely staying consistent over time. Additionally, the need for further acknowledgment and focus on the stress HCT places on caregivers was frequently discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were largely satisfied with the information and anticipatory guidance they were given but stressed a desire for more specific information throughout their HCT course. A variety of coping strategies are used by patients and their caregivers post-HCT, and these were consistently used over time. However, increased awareness and acknowledgment of the strain HCT places on caregivers are needed within the health care setting and in the general population. Future directions include continued incorporation of qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers as HCT-related interventions and apps.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"e81971"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12919964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/81971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) and their caregivers are under a significant amount of stress throughout the HCT process with fear of disease recurrence, graft failure, and many other HCT-related complications. However, the needs and perspectives of patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers as dyadic units over the peri-HCT period are continuing to be studied and are an evolving field of research.

Objective: To better understand patient and caregiver perspectives throughout the HCT course, patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were able to opt-in to interviews at multiple time points post-HCT as part of a larger study, Roadmap 2.0 (an app intervention trial to support caregivers of patients undergoing HCT).

Methods: Semistructured, dyadic (patient and caregiver) interviews took place around hospital discharge, day +30, +60, +90 and +120 post-HCT. Patient and caregiver discussions at each interview centered around a variety of topics including desired post-HCT information, coping, and additional resources for patients and their caregivers with the goal of gathering feedback to better inform future studies after Roadmap 2.0 and better understand the needs and perspectives of patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers. Interviews were transcribed and double-coded with inductive and deductive content analysis using the framework method to identify key findings.

Results: A total of 10 patient-caregiver dyads participated, resulting in 48 dyadic interviews (1 patient died). Multiple findings emerged out of these rich discussions, including the progression from immediately post-discharge to when patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were further out from HCT. The progression was as follows: "desire for data and tracking" to "need for specific restrictions and outline on forward progress," to "need for additional directed information as progressing forward," to "bigger picture and getting back to life," and concluding with "reflection and fear." Most patients and caregivers felt they were provided sufficient general anticipatory guidance throughout the HCT process but called for more specific expectations and guidance on a variety of issues. Many patients and caregivers used multiple coping strategies during HCT, with their coping strategies largely staying consistent over time. Additionally, the need for further acknowledgment and focus on the stress HCT places on caregivers was frequently discussed.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing HCT and their caregivers were largely satisfied with the information and anticipatory guidance they were given but stressed a desire for more specific information throughout their HCT course. A variety of coping strategies are used by patients and their caregivers post-HCT, and these were consistently used over time. However, increased awareness and acknowledgment of the strain HCT places on caregivers are needed within the health care setting and in the general population. Future directions include continued incorporation of qualitative interviews with patients and caregivers as HCT-related interventions and apps.

“你将不得不经历的艰难的事情”:包括造血细胞移植后患者及其护理人员的观点和需求的二元访谈研究。
背景:接受造血细胞移植(HCT)的患者及其护理人员在整个HCT过程中承受着巨大的压力,担心疾病复发、移植失败和许多其他HCT相关并发症。然而,接受HCT的患者及其护理人员作为双元单位在HCT围期间的需求和观点仍在继续研究,并且是一个不断发展的研究领域。目的:为了更好地了解患者和护理人员在整个HCT过程中的观点,接受HCT的患者及其护理人员可以选择在HCT后的多个时间点接受访谈,这是一项更大的研究路线图2.0(一项支持接受HCT患者护理人员的应用程序干预试验)的一部分。方法:在出院前后、hct后+30、+60、+90和+120天进行半结构化、二元(患者和护理人员)访谈。在每次访谈中,患者和护理人员围绕各种主题进行讨论,包括期望的HCT后信息、应对措施和患者及其护理人员的额外资源,目的是收集反馈,以便更好地为路线图2.0后的未来研究提供信息,并更好地了解接受HCT的患者及其护理人员的需求和观点。访谈记录和双重编码与归纳和演绎内容分析使用框架方法来确定关键发现。结果:共有10对患者-护理者参与,共进行了48次访谈(1例患者死亡)。从这些丰富的讨论中产生了多种发现,包括从出院后立即到接受HCT的患者及其护理人员远离HCT的进展。这个过程是这样的:“对数据和跟踪的渴望”到“需要对前进的进程进行具体的限制和概述”,再到“需要在前进的过程中获得额外的指导信息”,再到“更大的图景和回归生活”,最后以“反思和恐惧”结束。大多数患者和护理人员认为,在整个HCT过程中,他们得到了充分的一般预期指导,但要求对各种问题提供更具体的期望和指导。在HCT期间,许多患者和护理人员使用多种应对策略,随着时间的推移,他们的应对策略在很大程度上保持一致。此外,还经常讨论进一步认识和关注HCT给护理人员带来的压力的必要性。结论:接受HCT的患者及其护理人员对他们获得的信息和预期指导基本满意,但强调希望在整个HCT过程中获得更具体的信息。hct后,患者及其护理人员使用了各种应对策略,并且这些策略一直在使用。然而,在卫生保健机构和一般人群中,需要提高对HCT给护理人员带来的压力的认识和认识。未来的方向包括继续与患者和护理人员进行定性访谈,作为与hct相关的干预措施和应用程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书