Children's gut microbiota predicts the efficacy of obesity treatment.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gut Microbes Pub Date : 2026-12-31 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI:10.1080/19490976.2026.2631824
Mireia Alcázar, Verónica Luque, Natalia Ferré, Judit Muñoz-Hernando, Mariona Gispert-Llauradó, Ricardo Closa-Monasterolo, Albert Feliu, Gemma Castillejo, Joaquín Escribano
{"title":"Children's gut microbiota predicts the efficacy of obesity treatment.","authors":"Mireia Alcázar, Verónica Luque, Natalia Ferré, Judit Muñoz-Hernando, Mariona Gispert-Llauradó, Ricardo Closa-Monasterolo, Albert Feliu, Gemma Castillejo, Joaquín Escribano","doi":"10.1080/19490976.2026.2631824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background & objective: </strong>Responses to dietary interventions may vary depending on baseline gut microbiota composition. This study aimed to determine whether baseline gut microbiota diversity and composition predict the effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anthropometry, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, HOMA-IR, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) were evaluated and standardised in 41 children with obesity (8-14yrs). Faecal samples were collected at baseline and after one year. Intervention success was defined by improvements in metabolic risk score (MetScore) or BMI z-score. Associations between baseline microbiota features (diversity and composition) and intervention success were evaluated using Spearman's correlation and linear regression models. Gut microbiota composition and differential abundance were analyzed using ANCOM-BC2. Exploratory biomarker discovery was analyzed using LEfSe, and predictive modelling using a Random Forest (RF) classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine a Simpson index cut-off.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher baseline Shannon and Simpson indices, and greater abundances of <i>Faecalibacterium</i> and <i>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</i> group, were associated with greater improvements in MetScore. <i>Faecalibacterium</i> was the most influential feature with the highest importance in the RF model, which achieved an AUC of 0.876 for MetScore and 0.873 for BMI z-score improvement. Eighty-four features differed between MetScore response groups (FDR < 0.05) with some genus-level overlap with the exploratory analysis, including <i>Eubacterium coprostanoligenes</i> and <i>Ruminococcus</i>. A Simpson index cut-off of 0.849 stratified participants high- and low-diversity groups; children above this threshold exhibited greater improvements in MetScore (<i>p</i> = 0.028), SBP (<i>p</i> = 0.043), and in HDL-cholesterol (<i>p</i> = 0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Higher baseline gut microbiota diversity and specific microbial signatures, particularly <i>Faecalibacterium</i> abundance, predicted better outcomes in childhood obesity interventions. These findings support the potential use of microbiota profiling to guide personalised treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimise interventions.<b>Trial registration:</b> clinicaltrials.gov NCT03749291.</p>","PeriodicalId":12909,"journal":{"name":"Gut Microbes","volume":"18 1","pages":"2631824"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12928635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gut Microbes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2026.2631824","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & objective: Responses to dietary interventions may vary depending on baseline gut microbiota composition. This study aimed to determine whether baseline gut microbiota diversity and composition predict the effectiveness of childhood obesity interventions.

Methods: Anthropometry, triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol, HOMA-IR, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) were evaluated and standardised in 41 children with obesity (8-14yrs). Faecal samples were collected at baseline and after one year. Intervention success was defined by improvements in metabolic risk score (MetScore) or BMI z-score. Associations between baseline microbiota features (diversity and composition) and intervention success were evaluated using Spearman's correlation and linear regression models. Gut microbiota composition and differential abundance were analyzed using ANCOM-BC2. Exploratory biomarker discovery was analyzed using LEfSe, and predictive modelling using a Random Forest (RF) classifier. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine a Simpson index cut-off.

Results: Higher baseline Shannon and Simpson indices, and greater abundances of Faecalibacterium and Eubacterium coprostanoligenes group, were associated with greater improvements in MetScore. Faecalibacterium was the most influential feature with the highest importance in the RF model, which achieved an AUC of 0.876 for MetScore and 0.873 for BMI z-score improvement. Eighty-four features differed between MetScore response groups (FDR < 0.05) with some genus-level overlap with the exploratory analysis, including Eubacterium coprostanoligenes and Ruminococcus. A Simpson index cut-off of 0.849 stratified participants high- and low-diversity groups; children above this threshold exhibited greater improvements in MetScore (p = 0.028), SBP (p = 0.043), and in HDL-cholesterol (p = 0.028).

Conclusion: Higher baseline gut microbiota diversity and specific microbial signatures, particularly Faecalibacterium abundance, predicted better outcomes in childhood obesity interventions. These findings support the potential use of microbiota profiling to guide personalised treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimise interventions.Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT03749291.

儿童肠道菌群可以预测肥胖症治疗的效果。
背景与目的:对饮食干预的反应可能因基线肠道菌群组成而异。本研究旨在确定基线肠道菌群多样性和组成是否能预测儿童肥胖干预措施的有效性。方法:对41例肥胖儿童(8-14岁)的人体测量、甘油三酯、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、HOMA-IR、收缩压和舒张压(SBP、DBP)进行评估和标准化。在基线和一年后收集粪便样本。干预成功的定义是代谢风险评分(MetScore)或BMI z-score的改善。使用Spearman相关和线性回归模型评估基线微生物群特征(多样性和组成)与干预成功之间的关系。采用ANCOM-BC2分析肠道菌群组成和差异丰度。探索性生物标志物发现使用LEfSe进行分析,并使用随机森林(RF)分类器进行预测建模。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定辛普森指数截止值。结果:基线Shannon和Simpson指数越高,Faecalibacterium和Eubacterium coprostanoligene组的丰度越高,MetScore的改善越大。Faecalibacterium是RF模型中影响最大、重要性最高的特征,其MetScore改善的AUC为0.876,BMI z-score改善的AUC为0.873。MetScore反应组(FDR共前列腺寡聚真杆菌和鲁米诺球菌)之间有84个特征存在差异。高多样性组和低多样性组分层参与者的Simpson指数截止值为0.849;高于这个阈值的儿童在MetScore (p = 0.028)、收缩压(p = 0.043)和hdl -胆固醇(p = 0.028)方面表现出更大的改善。结论:更高的基线肠道微生物群多样性和特定微生物特征,特别是Faecalibacterium丰度,预示着儿童肥胖干预的更好结果。这些发现支持了微生物群分析在指导个性化治疗策略方面的潜在应用。需要进一步的研究来优化干预措施。试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov NCT03749291。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gut Microbes
Gut Microbes Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The intestinal microbiota plays a crucial role in human physiology, influencing various aspects of health and disease such as nutrition, obesity, brain function, allergic responses, immunity, inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, cancer development, cardiac disease, liver disease, and more. Gut Microbes serves as a platform for showcasing and discussing state-of-the-art research related to the microorganisms present in the intestine. The journal emphasizes mechanistic and cause-and-effect studies. Additionally, it has a counterpart, Gut Microbes Reports, which places a greater focus on emerging topics and comparative and incremental studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书