Cohort Prevalence Estimates Are Sensitive to Prebaseline Mortality: A Research Note Using Cognitive Impairment Data From the HAALSI Cohort in Rural South Africa.

IF 3.6 1区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Molly Rosenberg, Erika Beidelman, Xiwei Chen, Kathleen Kahn, Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula, Lindsay C Kobayashi
{"title":"Cohort Prevalence Estimates Are Sensitive to Prebaseline Mortality: A Research Note Using Cognitive Impairment Data From the HAALSI Cohort in Rural South Africa.","authors":"Molly Rosenberg, Erika Beidelman, Xiwei Chen, Kathleen Kahn, Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula, Lindsay C Kobayashi","doi":"10.1215/00703370-12479730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All cohorts are conditioned on survival to a study's baseline. The validity of estimates drawn from these cohorts of survivors may be compromised if those who die prior to enrollment have different covariate structures than survivors. In this research note, we used data from the \"HAALSI Cohort\" (Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa) of older adults in rural South Africa and a \"Mortality Cohort\" of individuals who would have been eligible for HAALSI but died before they had the opportunity to enroll, drawing on complete population mortality data from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System. We simulated the prevalence of cognitive impairment under different assumptions about the prevalence of such impairment in the Mortality Cohort. We constructed a random forest classification model to predict cognitive impairment in the Mortality Cohort and compared it with observed estimates in the HAALSI Cohort. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was sensitive to assumptions about the prevalence in the Mortality Cohort. The predictive model revealed meaningfully higher predicted probability of cognitive impairment in a counterfactual scenario with no prebaseline deaths. Researchers should consider prebaseline mortality in the interpretation of prevalence estimates, especially when the magnitude of prebaseline deaths is likely large.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"79-95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12479730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All cohorts are conditioned on survival to a study's baseline. The validity of estimates drawn from these cohorts of survivors may be compromised if those who die prior to enrollment have different covariate structures than survivors. In this research note, we used data from the "HAALSI Cohort" (Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa) of older adults in rural South Africa and a "Mortality Cohort" of individuals who would have been eligible for HAALSI but died before they had the opportunity to enroll, drawing on complete population mortality data from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System. We simulated the prevalence of cognitive impairment under different assumptions about the prevalence of such impairment in the Mortality Cohort. We constructed a random forest classification model to predict cognitive impairment in the Mortality Cohort and compared it with observed estimates in the HAALSI Cohort. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was sensitive to assumptions about the prevalence in the Mortality Cohort. The predictive model revealed meaningfully higher predicted probability of cognitive impairment in a counterfactual scenario with no prebaseline deaths. Researchers should consider prebaseline mortality in the interpretation of prevalence estimates, especially when the magnitude of prebaseline deaths is likely large.

队列患病率估计对基线前死亡率敏感:使用来自南非农村HAALSI队列的认知损伤数据的研究笔记。
所有队列的条件是生存到研究基线。如果在入组前死亡的幸存者与幸存者具有不同的协变量结构,则从这些幸存者队列中得出的估计的有效性可能会受到损害。在本研究报告中,我们使用了来自南非农村老年人的“HAALSI队列”(非洲健康与老龄化:南非INDEPTH社区的纵向研究)和“死亡率队列”的数据,这些数据来自阿金库尔健康和社会人口监测系统的完整人口死亡率数据,这些数据来自有资格参加HAALSI但在有机会登记之前死亡的个人。我们模拟了在死亡率队列中认知障碍患病率的不同假设下的认知障碍患病率。我们构建了一个随机森林分类模型来预测死亡率队列中的认知障碍,并将其与HAALSI队列中的观察估计值进行比较。认知障碍的患病率对死亡率队列中患病率的假设很敏感。预测模型显示,在没有基线前死亡的反事实情景中,有意义的更高的预测认知障碍概率。研究人员在解释患病率估计时应考虑基线前死亡率,特别是在基线前死亡率可能很大的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demography
Demography DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书