Cohort Prevalence Estimates Are Sensitive to Prebaseline Mortality: A Research Note Using Cognitive Impairment Data From the HAALSI Cohort in Rural South Africa.
Molly Rosenberg, Erika Beidelman, Xiwei Chen, Kathleen Kahn, Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula, Lindsay C Kobayashi
{"title":"Cohort Prevalence Estimates Are Sensitive to Prebaseline Mortality: A Research Note Using Cognitive Impairment Data From the HAALSI Cohort in Rural South Africa.","authors":"Molly Rosenberg, Erika Beidelman, Xiwei Chen, Kathleen Kahn, Chodziwadziwa W Kabudula, Lindsay C Kobayashi","doi":"10.1215/00703370-12479730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All cohorts are conditioned on survival to a study's baseline. The validity of estimates drawn from these cohorts of survivors may be compromised if those who die prior to enrollment have different covariate structures than survivors. In this research note, we used data from the \"HAALSI Cohort\" (Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa) of older adults in rural South Africa and a \"Mortality Cohort\" of individuals who would have been eligible for HAALSI but died before they had the opportunity to enroll, drawing on complete population mortality data from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System. We simulated the prevalence of cognitive impairment under different assumptions about the prevalence of such impairment in the Mortality Cohort. We constructed a random forest classification model to predict cognitive impairment in the Mortality Cohort and compared it with observed estimates in the HAALSI Cohort. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was sensitive to assumptions about the prevalence in the Mortality Cohort. The predictive model revealed meaningfully higher predicted probability of cognitive impairment in a counterfactual scenario with no prebaseline deaths. Researchers should consider prebaseline mortality in the interpretation of prevalence estimates, especially when the magnitude of prebaseline deaths is likely large.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":"79-95"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-12479730","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
All cohorts are conditioned on survival to a study's baseline. The validity of estimates drawn from these cohorts of survivors may be compromised if those who die prior to enrollment have different covariate structures than survivors. In this research note, we used data from the "HAALSI Cohort" (Health and Aging in Africa: A Longitudinal Study of an INDEPTH Community in South Africa) of older adults in rural South Africa and a "Mortality Cohort" of individuals who would have been eligible for HAALSI but died before they had the opportunity to enroll, drawing on complete population mortality data from the Agincourt Health and Socio-Demographic Surveillance System. We simulated the prevalence of cognitive impairment under different assumptions about the prevalence of such impairment in the Mortality Cohort. We constructed a random forest classification model to predict cognitive impairment in the Mortality Cohort and compared it with observed estimates in the HAALSI Cohort. The prevalence of cognitive impairment was sensitive to assumptions about the prevalence in the Mortality Cohort. The predictive model revealed meaningfully higher predicted probability of cognitive impairment in a counterfactual scenario with no prebaseline deaths. Researchers should consider prebaseline mortality in the interpretation of prevalence estimates, especially when the magnitude of prebaseline deaths is likely large.
期刊介绍:
Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.