{"title":"Association of Labor Epidural Analgesia with Neonatal Umbilical Arterial Blood pH and Apgar Score: The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS).","authors":"Misako Suto, Youichi Kurozawa, Shinji Otani, Toshio Masumoto, Keisuke Miyamoto, Akihiro Otsuki, Hiroki Amano, Akemi Morita","doi":"10.33160/yam.2026.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labor epidural analgesia is recognized worldwide as the gold standard for maternal pain relief during delivery and has been increasingly used in Japan. However, studies on labor analgesia in Japan are scarce, and evaluation of neonatal outcomes associated with this procedure remains limited. Among the key aspects in the safety evaluation of labor epidural analgesia are the potential effects on neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH (UmA-pH) and Apgar score. Therefore, we determined whether labor epidural analgesia during vaginal delivery is associated with neonatal UmA-pH and Apgar score among women delivering in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this birth cohort study, we prospectively analyzed data collected from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). We included Japanese pregnant women who had singleton vaginal deliveries. The primary exposure was labor epidural analgesia, and the primary outcomes were UmA-pH and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min following birth. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the associations between labor epidural analgesia and neonatal outcomes, with adjustment for potential confounders. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 96,443 women who had singleton deliveries in the JECS, 55,227 were included in the final analysis, 1,311 (2.4%) of whom received labor epidural analgesia. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and a 1-min Apgar score < 7 (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.03-2.29). However, only one neonate in the labor epidural analgesia group had a 5-min Apgar score < 7. Moreover, no significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and UmA-pH < 7.2 (aOR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76-1.17). In the IPTW-based sensitivity analysis, the effect estimates were consistent in direction with the primary analysis, supporting the robustness of the main findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large cohort of singleton vaginal births in Japan, the use of labor epidural analgesia had little to no clinically meaningful effect on neonatal outcomes, including UmA-pH < 7.2 and Apgar score < 7. These findings support informed decision-making for pregnant women in Japan who are considering labor epidural analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":"69 1","pages":"24-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910225/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2026.02.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Labor epidural analgesia is recognized worldwide as the gold standard for maternal pain relief during delivery and has been increasingly used in Japan. However, studies on labor analgesia in Japan are scarce, and evaluation of neonatal outcomes associated with this procedure remains limited. Among the key aspects in the safety evaluation of labor epidural analgesia are the potential effects on neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH (UmA-pH) and Apgar score. Therefore, we determined whether labor epidural analgesia during vaginal delivery is associated with neonatal UmA-pH and Apgar score among women delivering in Japan.
Methods: In this birth cohort study, we prospectively analyzed data collected from the Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS). We included Japanese pregnant women who had singleton vaginal deliveries. The primary exposure was labor epidural analgesia, and the primary outcomes were UmA-pH and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min following birth. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to examine the associations between labor epidural analgesia and neonatal outcomes, with adjustment for potential confounders. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was conducted.
Results: Of the 96,443 women who had singleton deliveries in the JECS, 55,227 were included in the final analysis, 1,311 (2.4%) of whom received labor epidural analgesia. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a statistically significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and a 1-min Apgar score < 7 (aOR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.03-2.29). However, only one neonate in the labor epidural analgesia group had a 5-min Apgar score < 7. Moreover, no significant association was observed between labor epidural analgesia and UmA-pH < 7.2 (aOR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76-1.17). In the IPTW-based sensitivity analysis, the effect estimates were consistent in direction with the primary analysis, supporting the robustness of the main findings.
Conclusion: In this large cohort of singleton vaginal births in Japan, the use of labor epidural analgesia had little to no clinically meaningful effect on neonatal outcomes, including UmA-pH < 7.2 and Apgar score < 7. These findings support informed decision-making for pregnant women in Japan who are considering labor epidural analgesia.
期刊介绍:
Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan.
The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education.
Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community.
Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.