A Questionnaire Survey on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Hospital-Based Healthcare Professionals.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Yonago acta medica Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.33160/yam.2026.02.016
Ayami Kimura, Tetsuro Oishi, Rina Fujioka, Wakae Tashiro, Masakuni Takahashi, Junzo Kigawa, Takashi Irie
{"title":"A Questionnaire Survey on Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among Hospital-Based Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Ayami Kimura, Tetsuro Oishi, Rina Fujioka, Wakae Tashiro, Masakuni Takahashi, Junzo Kigawa, Takashi Irie","doi":"10.33160/yam.2026.02.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although active human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendations resumed in Japan in 2022, vaccination rates remain low. Understanding hospital staff attitudes toward HPV vaccination may provide insights into improving vaccine uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous Google Form survey was conducted among Matsue City Hospital staff in August 2024. The questionnaire addressed knowledge and perceptions of cervical cancer and HPV vaccines, vaccination history, and future vaccination intentions. Respondents were classified as proactive or passive based on their family's vaccination intentions. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, with <i>P</i> < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from 154 participants (response rate: 23.6%), with 88.3% of participants aged ≥ 27 years. While 89.0% and 82.4% reported being \"well aware\" or \"aware\" of cervical cancer and HPV vaccines, respectively, 40.3% were passive about family vaccination, and 36.4% expressed safety concerns. Acceptance of vaccine efficacy was significantly higher in the proactive group than in the passive group (96.7% vs. 59.7%, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Safety concerns were significantly lower in the proactive group than in the passive group (25.0% vs. 56.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Knowledge was associated with understanding of efficacy (85.0% vs. 66.7%, <i>P</i> = 0.0502) but not with safety concerns (36.2% vs. 44.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.5126).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately 40% of healthcare workers exhibited passive attitudes toward vaccination, and safety concerns significantly influenced their intentions. Improving accurate knowledge dissemination and addressing negative safety perceptions among hospital staff are crucial for increasing vaccination rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":23795,"journal":{"name":"Yonago acta medica","volume":"69 1","pages":"119-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12910230/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yonago acta medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2026.02.016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although active human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination recommendations resumed in Japan in 2022, vaccination rates remain low. Understanding hospital staff attitudes toward HPV vaccination may provide insights into improving vaccine uptake.

Methods: An anonymous Google Form survey was conducted among Matsue City Hospital staff in August 2024. The questionnaire addressed knowledge and perceptions of cervical cancer and HPV vaccines, vaccination history, and future vaccination intentions. Respondents were classified as proactive or passive based on their family's vaccination intentions. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Responses were received from 154 participants (response rate: 23.6%), with 88.3% of participants aged ≥ 27 years. While 89.0% and 82.4% reported being "well aware" or "aware" of cervical cancer and HPV vaccines, respectively, 40.3% were passive about family vaccination, and 36.4% expressed safety concerns. Acceptance of vaccine efficacy was significantly higher in the proactive group than in the passive group (96.7% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.0001). Safety concerns were significantly lower in the proactive group than in the passive group (25.0% vs. 56.5%; P < 0.0001). Knowledge was associated with understanding of efficacy (85.0% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.0502) but not with safety concerns (36.2% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.5126).

Conclusion: Approximately 40% of healthcare workers exhibited passive attitudes toward vaccination, and safety concerns significantly influenced their intentions. Improving accurate knowledge dissemination and addressing negative safety perceptions among hospital staff are crucial for increasing vaccination rates.

医院医务人员人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种情况问卷调查
背景:尽管日本于2022年恢复了人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)活动性疫苗接种建议,但疫苗接种率仍然很低。了解医院工作人员对HPV疫苗接种的态度可以为提高疫苗的吸收率提供见解。方法:于2024年8月对松江市医院员工进行匿名谷歌问卷调查。调查问卷涉及宫颈癌和人乳头瘤病毒疫苗的知识和观念、疫苗接种史和未来疫苗接种意图。受访者根据其家庭的疫苗接种意图被分为主动或被动。采用Fisher精确检验进行统计学分析,P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:154名参与者(应答率:23.6%)收到应答,其中88.3%的参与者年龄≥27岁。89.0%和82.4%的受访者分别表示“非常了解”或“了解”宫颈癌和HPV疫苗,40.3%的受访者对家庭接种疫苗持被动态度,36.4%的受访者表示担心安全性。主动组接受疫苗疗效显著高于被动组(96.7% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.0001)。主动组的安全性担忧明显低于被动组(25.0%比56.5%;P < 0.0001)。知识与对疗效的理解相关(85.0%对66.7%,P = 0.0502),但与安全性问题无关(36.2%对44.4%,P = 0.5126)。结论:约40%的卫生保健工作者对疫苗接种表现出消极态度,安全问题显著影响了他们的接种意愿。改善准确的知识传播和消除医院工作人员的负面安全观念对于提高疫苗接种率至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Yonago acta medica
Yonago acta medica MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Yonago Acta Medica (YAM) is an electronic journal specializing in medical sciences, published by Tottori University Medical Press, 86 Nishi-cho, Yonago 683-8503, Japan. The subject areas cover the following: molecular/cell biology; biochemistry; basic medicine; clinical medicine; veterinary medicine; clinical nutrition and food sciences; medical engineering; nursing sciences; laboratory medicine; clinical psychology; medical education. Basically, contributors are limited to members of Tottori University and Tottori University Hospital. Researchers outside the above-mentioned university community may also submit papers on the recommendation of a professor, an associate professor, or a junior associate professor at this university community. Articles are classified into four categories: review articles, original articles, patient reports, and short communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书