{"title":"Role of Electroencephalography in the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: National Inpatient Sample, 2012-2017.","authors":"Ganesh Asaithambi, Summer L Martins","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Electroencephalography (EEG) is often used in the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Its role in the management of aSAH is not well known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of EEG in the management of aSAH patients by determining the association between EEG and outcomes and resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2012 to 2017 was queried for adult patients with aSAH. Patients were classified as having received EEG during the hospitalization or not. The NIS-SAH severity score (NIS-SSS) was used to account for illness severity. Weighted multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between the use of EEG and outcome of interest (total cost of care, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and home discharge) adjusting for demographic, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 41,896 patients with SAH (mean age 61.3 years, 41.8% male), 3.8% received EEG monitoring and had higher NIS-SSS (11.2 vs. 7.3, P <0.001). In multivariable models, the use of EEG was associated with higher cost of care (β=$113,740, 95% CI: $101,109-126,371) and longer LOS (β=6.21, 95% CI: 5.57-6.85). Patients with EEG had significantly lower risk of death in hospital (ARR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) but lower likelihood of home/self-care discharge (ARR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EEG monitoring was used in a minority of critically ill patients with aSAH. Although associated with increased cost of care and longer LOS, EEG likely averts adverse outcomes in patients with high severity and improves the chance of survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"172-175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Electroencephalography (EEG) is often used in the management of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Its role in the management of aSAH is not well known. The objective of this study is to evaluate the role of EEG in the management of aSAH patients by determining the association between EEG and outcomes and resource utilization.
Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2012 to 2017 was queried for adult patients with aSAH. Patients were classified as having received EEG during the hospitalization or not. The NIS-SAH severity score (NIS-SSS) was used to account for illness severity. Weighted multivariable regression models were used to estimate the association between the use of EEG and outcome of interest (total cost of care, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital mortality, and home discharge) adjusting for demographic, comorbidities, and other clinical characteristics.
Results: Among 41,896 patients with SAH (mean age 61.3 years, 41.8% male), 3.8% received EEG monitoring and had higher NIS-SSS (11.2 vs. 7.3, P <0.001). In multivariable models, the use of EEG was associated with higher cost of care (β=$113,740, 95% CI: $101,109-126,371) and longer LOS (β=6.21, 95% CI: 5.57-6.85). Patients with EEG had significantly lower risk of death in hospital (ARR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.96) but lower likelihood of home/self-care discharge (ARR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89).
Conclusion: EEG monitoring was used in a minority of critically ill patients with aSAH. Although associated with increased cost of care and longer LOS, EEG likely averts adverse outcomes in patients with high severity and improves the chance of survival.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies.
JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.