Jef J. J. van den Hout, Orin C. Davis, Siem Buseyne
{"title":"Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan","authors":"Jef J. J. van den Hout, Orin C. Davis, Siem Buseyne","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37-item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher-level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11-item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11-item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37-item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37-item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher-level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11-item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11-item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37-item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.