Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Jef J. J. van den Hout, Orin C. Davis, Siem Buseyne
{"title":"Assessing Team Flow and Its Outcomes in Work Teams: Validation of the Team Flow Monitor and Quick Scan","authors":"Jef J. J. van den Hout,&nbsp;Orin C. Davis,&nbsp;Siem Buseyne","doi":"10.1002/hfm.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37-item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher-level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11-item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11-item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37-item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":55048,"journal":{"name":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","volume":"36 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hfm.70037","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hfm.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research has shown that flow experiences among groups, such as sports teams and music groups, can positively affect group processes and outcomes. However, there has been limited research on the effects of team flow in the workplace, and existing studies have mainly employed a 37-item questionnaire, namely the Team Flow Monitor (TFM), as a basis for measuring team climates and coaching the teams to achieve higher-level performances. Recognizing the need for a more concise instrument, the scientific community seeks a tool that can be easily integrated with other research scales, while practitioners prefer a shorter measure for frequent and convenient assessment. To address this, the present study introduces an 11-item measure of team flow called the Team Flow Quick Scan (TFQS). In addition to validating this measure against the established TFM, this study seeks to replicate the established findings of team flow. While the TFQS measured team flow using a slightly different model from the TFM, the results are consistent with theory and the slightly restricted ability of an 11-item measure to have the sensitivity of a 37-item measure. Ultimately, results replicated the efficacy of the TFM and introduced the TFQS as a viable tool for measuring flow in teams, which can be a powerful aid in helping teams hit their highest performance levels.

Abstract Image

评估工作团队中的团队流及其结果:团队流监视器和快速扫描的验证
研究表明,团队之间的心流体验,比如运动队和音乐团队,可以对团队过程和结果产生积极影响。然而,关于团队流动对工作场所的影响的研究有限,现有研究主要采用37项问卷,即团队流动监视器(team flow Monitor, TFM),作为测量团队气候和指导团队实现更高水平绩效的基础。认识到需要一种更简洁的工具,科学界寻求一种可以容易地与其他研究量表相结合的工具,而从业者则倾向于一种更短的测量方法,以便进行频繁和方便的评估。为了解决这个问题,本研究引入了一个包含11个项目的团队流测量方法,称为团队流快速扫描(TFQS)。除了根据既定的TFM验证这一措施外,本研究还试图复制团队流动的既定发现。虽然TFQS使用与TFM略有不同的模型来测量团队流动,但结果与理论一致,并且11项测量的能力略受限制,无法具有37项测量的灵敏度。最终,结果证实了TFM的有效性,并将TFQS作为衡量团队流程的可行工具,它可以有力地帮助团队达到最高绩效水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: The purpose of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries is to facilitate discovery, integration, and application of scientific knowledge about human aspects of manufacturing, and to provide a forum for worldwide dissemination of such knowledge for its application and benefit to manufacturing industries. The journal covers a broad spectrum of ergonomics and human factors issues with a focus on the design, operation and management of contemporary manufacturing systems, both in the shop floor and office environments, in the quest for manufacturing agility, i.e. enhancement and integration of human skills with hardware performance for improved market competitiveness, management of change, product and process quality, and human-system reliability. The inter- and cross-disciplinary nature of the journal allows for a wide scope of issues relevant to manufacturing system design and engineering, human resource management, social, organizational, safety, and health issues. Examples of specific subject areas of interest include: implementation of advanced manufacturing technology, human aspects of computer-aided design and engineering, work design, compensation and appraisal, selection training and education, labor-management relations, agile manufacturing and virtual companies, human factors in total quality management, prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, ergonomics of workplace, equipment and tool design, ergonomics programs, guides and standards for industry, automation safety and robot systems, human skills development and knowledge enhancing technologies, reliability, and safety and worker health issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书