Determinants of cervical cancer screening among African and African American women: a qualitative systematic review.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Ethnicity & Health Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-17 DOI:10.1080/13557858.2026.2630820
Olamide Comfort Ogundare, Grace Oluwatofunmi Adeyemo, Sunkanmi Folorunsho
{"title":"Determinants of cervical cancer screening among African and African American women: a qualitative systematic review.","authors":"Olamide Comfort Ogundare, Grace Oluwatofunmi Adeyemo, Sunkanmi Folorunsho","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2026.2630820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the individual- and systemic-level barriers and facilitators that influence cervical cancer screening behaviors among African and African American women, and to highlight both shared and unique factors through the lens of the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) framework.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. Twelve peer-reviewed qualitative studies published between January 2020 and May 2025 were included. Data were analyzed thematically to classify barriers and facilitators at both individual and systemic levels, using the SDH framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across both populations, common barriers included limited awareness, cultural and religious stigma, and financial concerns. African women frequently reported infrastructural and logistical barriers such as distance and shortages of trained providers, while African American women emphasized institutional mistrust, racial discrimination, and inconsistent communication with providers. However, factors such as community-based education, peer and partner support, and personal motivation facilitated screening uptake in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study shows that even though African women and African American women share similar barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening, the underlying causes differ. Among African women, poor screening uptake is largely due to inadequate health infrastructure, whereas African American women's barriers are rooted in historical medical mistrust. These findings highlight the need for culturally tailored interventions, such as community-driven awareness and culturally trained providers, that respond to the lived experiences of each population rather than adopting a monolithic approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"332-347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2026.2630820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the individual- and systemic-level barriers and facilitators that influence cervical cancer screening behaviors among African and African American women, and to highlight both shared and unique factors through the lens of the Social Determinants of Health (SDH) framework.

Design: A qualitative systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 standards. Twelve peer-reviewed qualitative studies published between January 2020 and May 2025 were included. Data were analyzed thematically to classify barriers and facilitators at both individual and systemic levels, using the SDH framework.

Results: Across both populations, common barriers included limited awareness, cultural and religious stigma, and financial concerns. African women frequently reported infrastructural and logistical barriers such as distance and shortages of trained providers, while African American women emphasized institutional mistrust, racial discrimination, and inconsistent communication with providers. However, factors such as community-based education, peer and partner support, and personal motivation facilitated screening uptake in both groups.

Conclusion: The study shows that even though African women and African American women share similar barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening, the underlying causes differ. Among African women, poor screening uptake is largely due to inadequate health infrastructure, whereas African American women's barriers are rooted in historical medical mistrust. These findings highlight the need for culturally tailored interventions, such as community-driven awareness and culturally trained providers, that respond to the lived experiences of each population rather than adopting a monolithic approach.

非洲和非裔美国妇女宫颈癌筛查的决定因素:一项定性系统评价。
目的:研究影响非洲和非裔美国妇女宫颈癌筛查行为的个体和系统层面的障碍和促进因素,并通过健康的社会决定因素(SDH)框架的视角强调共同和独特的因素。设计:按照PRISMA 2020标准进行定性系统评价。纳入了2020年1月至2025年5月期间发表的12项同行评议的定性研究。使用SDH框架,对数据进行主题分析,以在个人和系统层面对障碍和促进因素进行分类。结果:在这两个人群中,常见的障碍包括意识有限、文化和宗教耻辱以及经济问题。非洲妇女经常报告基础设施和后勤障碍,如距离遥远和缺乏训练有素的提供者,而非洲裔美国妇女则强调机构不信任、种族歧视和与提供者的沟通不一致。然而,社区教育、同伴和伙伴支持以及个人动机等因素促进了两组接受筛查。结论:该研究表明,尽管非洲裔妇女和非裔美国妇女在宫颈癌筛查方面有相似的障碍和促进因素,但根本原因不同。在非洲妇女中,很少接受筛查主要是由于卫生基础设施不足,而非洲裔美国妇女的障碍源于历史上对医疗的不信任。这些发现突出了针对不同文化的干预措施的必要性,例如社区驱动的意识和受过文化培训的提供者,这些干预措施应响应每个人群的生活经验,而不是采用单一的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnicity & Health
Ethnicity & Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ethnicity & Health is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书