Pivoting to serious illness conversations to meet advance care planning quality measures in academic primary care clinics

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Grant M. Smith , Anuradha Phadke , Briththa Seevaratnam , Rebecca Fong , Ana Calugar , Winifred G. Teuteberg , Rachelle E. Bernacki
{"title":"Pivoting to serious illness conversations to meet advance care planning quality measures in academic primary care clinics","authors":"Grant M. Smith ,&nbsp;Anuradha Phadke ,&nbsp;Briththa Seevaratnam ,&nbsp;Rebecca Fong ,&nbsp;Ana Calugar ,&nbsp;Winifred G. Teuteberg ,&nbsp;Rachelle E. Bernacki","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2026.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>As novel payment models incentivize advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, conversation-focused models of ACP that prioritize serious illness conversations (SICs), which focus on discussing patients’ understanding of their illness and their goals and values, can make meeting quality measures more clinically impactful.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We implemented the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), an evidence-based ACP intervention, in academic primary care clinics. SICP supports healthcare systems to increase SICs through clinician training, coaching, and integrating a documentation module within the electronic medical record. Key facilitators of our implementation included adapting SICP training to accommodate primary care providers’ (PCPs) schedules, financial incentives for PCPs to complete SICP training and SICs, support of a physician ACP quality lead role, leadership support, and information technology collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Throughout the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, 59 of the 84 faculty PCPs (70%) in our primary care clinics completed SICP training. Of the SICP-trained PCPs, 41 (69%) completed at least one SIC. During the implementation, 340 SICs were documented for 238 unique patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>While additional work is needed to increase rates of PCPs completing SICs, we found that implementing SICP in academic primary care clinics is feasible when incentives, leadership support, and champions are in place.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"14 1","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076426000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

As novel payment models incentivize advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, conversation-focused models of ACP that prioritize serious illness conversations (SICs), which focus on discussing patients’ understanding of their illness and their goals and values, can make meeting quality measures more clinically impactful.

Methods

We implemented the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), an evidence-based ACP intervention, in academic primary care clinics. SICP supports healthcare systems to increase SICs through clinician training, coaching, and integrating a documentation module within the electronic medical record. Key facilitators of our implementation included adapting SICP training to accommodate primary care providers’ (PCPs) schedules, financial incentives for PCPs to complete SICP training and SICs, support of a physician ACP quality lead role, leadership support, and information technology collaboration.

Results

Throughout the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, 59 of the 84 faculty PCPs (70%) in our primary care clinics completed SICP training. Of the SICP-trained PCPs, 41 (69%) completed at least one SIC. During the implementation, 340 SICs were documented for 238 unique patients.

Conclusion and implications

While additional work is needed to increase rates of PCPs completing SICs, we found that implementing SICP in academic primary care clinics is feasible when incentives, leadership support, and champions are in place.
转向重症对话,以满足学术初级保健诊所的提前护理计划质量措施。
目的:随着新型支付模式在初级保健中激励预先护理计划(ACP),优先考虑重病对话(SICs)的ACP以对话为重点的模式,侧重于讨论患者对其疾病及其目标和价值观的理解,可以使会议质量措施更具临床影响力。方法:我们在学术初级保健诊所实施了重症护理计划(SICP),这是一种基于证据的ACP干预。SICP支持医疗保健系统通过临床医生培训、指导和在电子病历中集成文档模块来增加ics。我们实施的主要促进因素包括调整SICP培训以适应初级保健提供者(pcp)的时间表,为pcp完成SICP培训和sic提供财政激励,支持医生ACP质量领导角色,领导支持和信息技术协作。结果:在整个2023和2024财政年度,我们初级保健诊所的84名教员pcp中有59名(70%)完成了SICP培训。在sicp培训的pcp中,41名(69%)完成了至少一项sicp。在实施期间,记录了238例特殊患者的340例sic。结论和意义:虽然需要做更多的工作来提高pcp完成SICP的比率,但我们发现,在激励、领导支持和支持者到位的情况下,在学术初级保健诊所实施SICP是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书