Grant M. Smith , Anuradha Phadke , Briththa Seevaratnam , Rebecca Fong , Ana Calugar , Winifred G. Teuteberg , Rachelle E. Bernacki
{"title":"Pivoting to serious illness conversations to meet advance care planning quality measures in academic primary care clinics","authors":"Grant M. Smith , Anuradha Phadke , Briththa Seevaratnam , Rebecca Fong , Ana Calugar , Winifred G. Teuteberg , Rachelle E. Bernacki","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2026.100777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>As novel payment models incentivize advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, conversation-focused models of ACP that prioritize serious illness conversations (SICs), which focus on discussing patients’ understanding of their illness and their goals and values, can make meeting quality measures more clinically impactful.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We implemented the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), an evidence-based ACP intervention, in academic primary care clinics. SICP supports healthcare systems to increase SICs through clinician training, coaching, and integrating a documentation module within the electronic medical record. Key facilitators of our implementation included adapting SICP training to accommodate primary care providers’ (PCPs) schedules, financial incentives for PCPs to complete SICP training and SICs, support of a physician ACP quality lead role, leadership support, and information technology collaboration.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Throughout the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, 59 of the 84 faculty PCPs (70%) in our primary care clinics completed SICP training. Of the SICP-trained PCPs, 41 (69%) completed at least one SIC. During the implementation, 340 SICs were documented for 238 unique patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>While additional work is needed to increase rates of PCPs completing SICs, we found that implementing SICP in academic primary care clinics is feasible when incentives, leadership support, and champions are in place.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"14 1","pages":"Article 100777"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213076426000011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
As novel payment models incentivize advance care planning (ACP) in primary care, conversation-focused models of ACP that prioritize serious illness conversations (SICs), which focus on discussing patients’ understanding of their illness and their goals and values, can make meeting quality measures more clinically impactful.
Methods
We implemented the Serious Illness Care Program (SICP), an evidence-based ACP intervention, in academic primary care clinics. SICP supports healthcare systems to increase SICs through clinician training, coaching, and integrating a documentation module within the electronic medical record. Key facilitators of our implementation included adapting SICP training to accommodate primary care providers’ (PCPs) schedules, financial incentives for PCPs to complete SICP training and SICs, support of a physician ACP quality lead role, leadership support, and information technology collaboration.
Results
Throughout the 2023 and 2024 fiscal years, 59 of the 84 faculty PCPs (70%) in our primary care clinics completed SICP training. Of the SICP-trained PCPs, 41 (69%) completed at least one SIC. During the implementation, 340 SICs were documented for 238 unique patients.
Conclusion and implications
While additional work is needed to increase rates of PCPs completing SICs, we found that implementing SICP in academic primary care clinics is feasible when incentives, leadership support, and champions are in place.
期刊介绍:
HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology.
The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as:
● Care redesign
● Applied health IT
● Payment innovation
● Managerial innovation
● Quality improvement (QI) research
● New training and education models
● Comparative delivery innovation