Intrinsic capacity and healthy aging in the United Kingdom and Brazil: a coordinated analysis of 2 population-based cohort studies.

Laiss Bertola, Yu-Tzu Wu, Márlon Juliano R Aliberti, Andrew Kingston, Marcel Hiratsuka, Eduardo Ferriolli, Matthew Prina, Claudia K Suemoto
{"title":"Intrinsic capacity and healthy aging in the United Kingdom and Brazil: a coordinated analysis of 2 population-based cohort studies.","authors":"Laiss Bertola, Yu-Tzu Wu, Márlon Juliano R Aliberti, Andrew Kingston, Marcel Hiratsuka, Eduardo Ferriolli, Matthew Prina, Claudia K Suemoto","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glag033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although intrinsic capacity (IC) is a multidimensional marker of healthy aging, cross-country validation in diverse cultural and socioeconomic contexts remains limited. We study aimed to harmonize the operationalization of IC and examine its associations with sociodemographic characteristics and health outcomes in the United Kingdom and Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nationally representative cohorts of community-dwelling older adults in both countries, aged ≥60 years from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 3392) and Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 3580). IC was derived using bi-factor models comprising locomotor, cognition, psychological, sensory, and vitality measures, standardized to a 0-100 scale. Linear regressions assessed IC associations with sociodemographic factors. Logistic regressions examined IC associations with poor/fair self-rated health and disability in basic activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL). We tested whether education and wealth modified these associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean IC scores were lower in women than in men, with differences of 3.06 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.30-3.82) in the United Kingdom and 8.14 (95% CI = 7.40-8.90) in Brazil. Older age, non-White race/ethnicity, less education, and lower wealth were also linked to lower IC scores. Higher IC was associated with lower odds of poor/fair self-rated health in the United Kingdom (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.29-0.35) and Brazil (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.48-0.61). Higher IC was also linked to lower odds of ADL and IADL disability in both cohorts. No significant interactions were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IC showed consistent associations with sociodemographic factors and health outcomes both countries. IC may inform equitable, person-cent red healthy aging policies for older adults in diverse contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glag033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although intrinsic capacity (IC) is a multidimensional marker of healthy aging, cross-country validation in diverse cultural and socioeconomic contexts remains limited. We study aimed to harmonize the operationalization of IC and examine its associations with sociodemographic characteristics and health outcomes in the United Kingdom and Brazil.

Methods: Nationally representative cohorts of community-dwelling older adults in both countries, aged ≥60 years from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 3392) and Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Ageing (n = 3580). IC was derived using bi-factor models comprising locomotor, cognition, psychological, sensory, and vitality measures, standardized to a 0-100 scale. Linear regressions assessed IC associations with sociodemographic factors. Logistic regressions examined IC associations with poor/fair self-rated health and disability in basic activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL). We tested whether education and wealth modified these associations.

Results: Mean IC scores were lower in women than in men, with differences of 3.06 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.30-3.82) in the United Kingdom and 8.14 (95% CI = 7.40-8.90) in Brazil. Older age, non-White race/ethnicity, less education, and lower wealth were also linked to lower IC scores. Higher IC was associated with lower odds of poor/fair self-rated health in the United Kingdom (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.29-0.35) and Brazil (OR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.48-0.61). Higher IC was also linked to lower odds of ADL and IADL disability in both cohorts. No significant interactions were found.

Conclusions: IC showed consistent associations with sociodemographic factors and health outcomes both countries. IC may inform equitable, person-cent red healthy aging policies for older adults in diverse contexts.

英国和巴西的内在能力和健康老龄化:对两项基于人群的队列研究的协调分析。
背景:虽然内在能力(IC)是健康老龄化的一个多维标志,但在不同文化和社会经济背景下的跨国验证仍然有限。我们的研究旨在协调IC的运作,并检查其与英国和巴西的社会人口特征和健康结果的关联。方法:在英国和巴西的社区居住老年人的全国代表性队列,年龄≥60岁,来自英国老龄化纵向研究(n = 3392)和巴西老龄化纵向研究(n = 3580)。IC采用双因素模型推导,包括运动、认知、心理、感觉和活力测量,标准化到0-100分。线性回归评估IC与社会人口因素的关系。Logistic回归检验了IC与基本(ADL)和工具性(IADL)日常生活活动中自评健康和残疾状况差/一般的关联。我们测试了教育和财富是否会改变这些联系。结果:女性的平均IC评分低于男性,英国的差异为3.06分(95%CI=2.30-3.82),巴西的差异为8.14分(95%CI=7.40-8.90)。年龄较大、非白人种族/民族、受教育程度较低和财富较低也与较低的智商得分有关。在英国(OR = 0.32; 95%CI=0.29-0.35)和巴西(OR = 0.54; 95%CI=0.48-0.61),较高的IC与较低的自评健康不良/一般的几率相关。在两个队列中,较高的IC也与较低的ADL和IADL残疾几率有关。没有发现显著的相互作用。结论:在英国和巴西,IC显示出与社会人口因素和健康结果的一致关联。IC可以为在不同情况下针对老年人的公平、以人为本的健康老龄化政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书