Septic shock reduces intestinal microcirculation and anastomotic perfusion: A porcine laser speckle contrast imaging study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Rupan Paramasivam, Claudia Jaensch, Nickolai M Kristensen, Susie Sarah Paramasivam, Helen Woldeselassie, Louise Kruse Jensen, Anders Husted Madsen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft
{"title":"Septic shock reduces intestinal microcirculation and anastomotic perfusion: A porcine laser speckle contrast imaging study.","authors":"Rupan Paramasivam, Claudia Jaensch, Nickolai M Kristensen, Susie Sarah Paramasivam, Helen Woldeselassie, Louise Kruse Jensen, Anders Husted Madsen, Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.111928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic shock disrupts systemic and organ-specific microcirculation, leading to poor tissue perfusion and impaired healing. While mesenteric hemodynamics have been studied, the impact of sepsis on intestinal microcirculation and anastomotic healing remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the short-term effects of septic shock on microcirculation in the small intestine and colon, with a focus on hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses, using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten pigs underwent midline laparotomy with the creation of four anastomoses: One hand-sewn and one stapled anastomosis in both the small intestine and colon. LSCI measurements were taken before anastomosis formation (T<sub>B</sub>), immediately after (T<sub>A</sub>), and after one hour of rest (T<sub>0</sub>). Septic shock was induced <i>via</i> intravenous <i>Escherichia coli</i> infusion, with subsequent LSCI measurements at 30-minute intervals (T<sub>30</sub>-T<sub>150</sub>). Results were expressed as relative changes compared to T<sub>B</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Septic shock significantly reduced microcirculation in both untouched intestine and anastomoses. Hand-sewn anastomoses consistently exhibited higher perfusion than stapled anastomoses. At T<sub>150</sub>, perfusion in hand-sewn anastomoses remained significantly higher than in stapled anastomoses (51% <i>vs</i> 34% of T<sub>B</sub>, <i>P</i> = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study shows that septic shock significantly impairs intestinal microcirculation indicating a risk of intestinal ischemia if bacteriaemia and subsequent septic shock is untreated. Due to diminish blood flow following septic shock, the anastomotic healing may be compromised leading to increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Conclusively, this study provides a foundation for optimizing surgical strategies and improving patient outcomes in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":"111928"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12898909/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v18.i1.111928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Septic shock disrupts systemic and organ-specific microcirculation, leading to poor tissue perfusion and impaired healing. While mesenteric hemodynamics have been studied, the impact of sepsis on intestinal microcirculation and anastomotic healing remains unclear.

Aim: To assess the short-term effects of septic shock on microcirculation in the small intestine and colon, with a focus on hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses, using laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI).

Methods: Ten pigs underwent midline laparotomy with the creation of four anastomoses: One hand-sewn and one stapled anastomosis in both the small intestine and colon. LSCI measurements were taken before anastomosis formation (TB), immediately after (TA), and after one hour of rest (T0). Septic shock was induced via intravenous Escherichia coli infusion, with subsequent LSCI measurements at 30-minute intervals (T30-T150). Results were expressed as relative changes compared to TB.

Results: Septic shock significantly reduced microcirculation in both untouched intestine and anastomoses. Hand-sewn anastomoses consistently exhibited higher perfusion than stapled anastomoses. At T150, perfusion in hand-sewn anastomoses remained significantly higher than in stapled anastomoses (51% vs 34% of TB, P = 0.002).

Conclusion: This study shows that septic shock significantly impairs intestinal microcirculation indicating a risk of intestinal ischemia if bacteriaemia and subsequent septic shock is untreated. Due to diminish blood flow following septic shock, the anastomotic healing may be compromised leading to increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Conclusively, this study provides a foundation for optimizing surgical strategies and improving patient outcomes in this high-risk population.

脓毒性休克减少肠道微循环和吻合口灌注:猪激光散斑造影研究。
背景:感染性休克破坏全身和器官特异性微循环,导致组织灌注不良和愈合受损。虽然研究了肠系膜血流动力学,但脓毒症对肠道微循环和吻合口愈合的影响尚不清楚。目的:应用激光散斑造影(LSCI)技术,探讨感染性休克对小肠和结肠微循环的短期影响,重点观察手工缝合吻合术。方法:10头猪行剖腹正中开腹术,在小肠和结肠各造4个吻合口:1个手工缝合,1个吻合器。分别在吻合口形成前(TB)、吻合口形成后立即(TA)和休息1小时后(T0)测量LSCI。通过静脉输注大肠杆菌诱导感染性休克,随后每隔30分钟(T30-T150)测量LSCI。结果表示为与TB相比的相对变化。结果:感染性休克显著降低了未接触肠和吻合口的微循环。手缝吻合口始终比钉接吻合口表现出更高的灌注。T150时,手缝吻合器的灌注仍显著高于吻合器(51% vs 34%, P = 0.002)。结论:本研究表明,脓毒性休克显著损害肠道微循环,表明如果不治疗细菌血症和随后的脓毒性休克,有肠缺血的危险。由于脓毒性休克后血流量减少,吻合口愈合可能受到损害,导致吻合口漏的风险增加。总之,本研究为这一高危人群优化手术策略和改善患者预后提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书