Comparison of the Effectiveness of Grape Seed Extract and Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.3 Q2 BIOLOGY
Scientifica Pub Date : 2026-02-12 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/sci5/6656174
Tun Yi Darren Ong, Wei Nee Lim, Li Jia Ong, Ju Wen Lim, Gursimrendeep Kaur, Anchu Rachel Thomas, Venkata Bharatwaj Narasu
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Grape Seed Extract and Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Tun Yi Darren Ong, Wei Nee Lim, Li Jia Ong, Ju Wen Lim, Gursimrendeep Kaur, Anchu Rachel Thomas, Venkata Bharatwaj Narasu","doi":"10.1155/sci5/6656174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of grape seed extract (GSE) and its combination with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in alleviating pain from dentin hypersensitivity (DH) compared to LLLT alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 20-50 years with at least three sensitive teeth in different quadrants and baseline pain scores ≥ 2 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited. Each tooth was randomly allocated to one of three groups: LLLT + placebo, GSE + placebo, or GSE + LLLT. Pain scores were recorded on Days 1, 3, and 7 using cold and air spray tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GSE + LLLT group demonstrated the greatest reduction in pain sensitivity, showing a 72.8% decrease for air spray and 59.51% for the cold test at Day 3, compared to the LLLT or GSE groups alone. However, there were no statistically significant differences (<i>P</i> > 0.05) in pain score reduction among the groups at any time point.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The combination of GSE and LLLT may enhance early pain reduction in DH compared to individual treatments, but the improvement was not statistically significant. GSE presents a potentially feasible and patient-friendly alternative for DH management, warranting further clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Data were collected and analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software program, Version 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois). General linear model-repeated measure ANOVA was carried out to assess the reduction in DH pain score among individual interventions and the comparison between the three interventions. The significance level was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While GSE combined with LLLT showed the greatest numerical reduction in DH pain scores, the difference was not statistically significant. Further large-scale studies are recommended to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05927831.</p>","PeriodicalId":21726,"journal":{"name":"Scientifica","volume":"2026 ","pages":"6656174"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12901653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/sci5/6656174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of grape seed extract (GSE) and its combination with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in alleviating pain from dentin hypersensitivity (DH) compared to LLLT alone.

Methods: Patients aged 20-50 years with at least three sensitive teeth in different quadrants and baseline pain scores ≥ 2 on the visual analog scale (VAS) were recruited. Each tooth was randomly allocated to one of three groups: LLLT + placebo, GSE + placebo, or GSE + LLLT. Pain scores were recorded on Days 1, 3, and 7 using cold and air spray tests.

Results: The GSE + LLLT group demonstrated the greatest reduction in pain sensitivity, showing a 72.8% decrease for air spray and 59.51% for the cold test at Day 3, compared to the LLLT or GSE groups alone. However, there were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in pain score reduction among the groups at any time point.

Discussion: The combination of GSE and LLLT may enhance early pain reduction in DH compared to individual treatments, but the improvement was not statistically significant. GSE presents a potentially feasible and patient-friendly alternative for DH management, warranting further clinical validation.

Statistical analysis used: Data were collected and analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software program, Version 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois). General linear model-repeated measure ANOVA was carried out to assess the reduction in DH pain score among individual interventions and the comparison between the three interventions. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Conclusion: While GSE combined with LLLT showed the greatest numerical reduction in DH pain scores, the difference was not statistically significant. Further large-scale studies are recommended to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05927831.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

葡萄籽提取物与低强度激光治疗牙本质过敏的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验。
目的:评价葡萄籽提取物(GSE)及其联合低强度激光治疗(LLLT)减轻牙本质过敏症(DH)疼痛的疗效。方法:招募年龄在20 ~ 50岁、至少3颗不同象限敏感牙且基线疼痛评分≥2分的患者。每颗牙齿被随机分配到三组中的一组:LLLT +安慰剂、GSE +安慰剂或GSE + LLLT。在第1、3、7天采用冷喷和空气喷试验记录疼痛评分。结果:与单独使用LLLT或GSE组相比,GSE + LLLT组在疼痛敏感性方面表现出最大的降低,在第3天,空气喷射试验降低了72.8%,冷试验降低了59.51%。各组疼痛评分在各时间点的差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。讨论:与单独治疗相比,GSE和LLLT联合治疗可增强DH早期疼痛减轻,但改善无统计学意义。GSE提供了一种潜在可行且对患者友好的DH管理替代方案,需要进一步的临床验证。使用统计分析:使用IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)软件程序,Version 20.0 (IBM, Chicago, Illinois)收集和分析数据。采用一般线性模型-重复测量方差分析(General linear model-repeated measure ANOVA)来评估个体干预措施对DH疼痛评分的降低程度以及三种干预措施之间的比较。结论:GSE联合LLLT对DH疼痛评分的数值降低幅度最大,但差异无统计学意义。建议进一步进行大规模研究,以证实这种组合的临床益处。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT05927831。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientifica
Scientifica BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientifica is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in the life sciences, environmental sciences, health sciences, and medicine. The journal is divided into the 65 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书