Detection and prognostic stratification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography.
Soo Youn Lee, Ah-Hyun Yoo, Sora Kang, Jong-Hwan Jang, Yong-Yeon Jo, Jeong Min Son, Min Sung Lee, Ga In Han, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Hak Seung Lee, Kyung-Hee Kim
{"title":"Detection and prognostic stratification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography.","authors":"Soo Youn Lee, Ah-Hyun Yoo, Sora Kang, Jong-Hwan Jang, Yong-Yeon Jo, Jeong Min Son, Min Sung Lee, Ga In Han, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Hak Seung Lee, Kyung-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1186/s44348-026-00066-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch block (LBBB) significantly increases the risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to cardiac dyssynchrony. Although artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) models show promise in detecting LVSD, their performance in LBBB patients remains underexplored. We hypothesized that an AI-ECG model clinically validated for detecting LVSD would accurately detect LVSD and predict future clinical outcomes in LBBB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, 5,689 expert-validated LBBB ECGs collected from 2,813 patients between 2016 and 2024 were analyzed using a previously developed and validated AI-ECG model. LVSD was defined as an ejection fraction of ≤ 40%. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on a threshold that achieved 90% sensitivity. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,813 LBBB patients (mean age, 70.7 years; male sex, 43.7%), hypertension and a history of heart failure were common. The AiTiALVSD model showed strong diagnostic performance for LVSD (AUROC, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.924-0.937]; AUPRC, 0.913 [95% CI, 0.902-0.923]; sensitivity, 0.979; specificity, 0.473). During the mean follow-up of 4.1 years, high-risk patients had significantly higher hazards than low-risk patients for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.28), implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (adjusted HR, 15.2; 95% CI, 7.51-30.77), and cardiovascular hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AiTiALVSD effectively detects LVSD and stratifies long-term cardiovascular risk in LBBB patients, supporting its clinical utility for early detection and patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-026-00066-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) significantly increases the risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to cardiac dyssynchrony. Although artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) models show promise in detecting LVSD, their performance in LBBB patients remains underexplored. We hypothesized that an AI-ECG model clinically validated for detecting LVSD would accurately detect LVSD and predict future clinical outcomes in LBBB patients.
Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 5,689 expert-validated LBBB ECGs collected from 2,813 patients between 2016 and 2024 were analyzed using a previously developed and validated AI-ECG model. LVSD was defined as an ejection fraction of ≤ 40%. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on a threshold that achieved 90% sensitivity. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes.
Results: Among the 2,813 LBBB patients (mean age, 70.7 years; male sex, 43.7%), hypertension and a history of heart failure were common. The AiTiALVSD model showed strong diagnostic performance for LVSD (AUROC, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.924-0.937]; AUPRC, 0.913 [95% CI, 0.902-0.923]; sensitivity, 0.979; specificity, 0.473). During the mean follow-up of 4.1 years, high-risk patients had significantly higher hazards than low-risk patients for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.28), implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (adjusted HR, 15.2; 95% CI, 7.51-30.77), and cardiovascular hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28).
Conclusions: AiTiALVSD effectively detects LVSD and stratifies long-term cardiovascular risk in LBBB patients, supporting its clinical utility for early detection and patient management.