Detection and prognostic stratification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography.

Q2 Medicine
Soo Youn Lee, Ah-Hyun Yoo, Sora Kang, Jong-Hwan Jang, Yong-Yeon Jo, Jeong Min Son, Min Sung Lee, Ga In Han, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Hak Seung Lee, Kyung-Hee Kim
{"title":"Detection and prognostic stratification of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in left bundle branch block using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography.","authors":"Soo Youn Lee, Ah-Hyun Yoo, Sora Kang, Jong-Hwan Jang, Yong-Yeon Jo, Jeong Min Son, Min Sung Lee, Ga In Han, Joon-Myoung Kwon, Hak Seung Lee, Kyung-Hee Kim","doi":"10.1186/s44348-026-00066-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left bundle branch block (LBBB) significantly increases the risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to cardiac dyssynchrony. Although artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) models show promise in detecting LVSD, their performance in LBBB patients remains underexplored. We hypothesized that an AI-ECG model clinically validated for detecting LVSD would accurately detect LVSD and predict future clinical outcomes in LBBB patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter study, 5,689 expert-validated LBBB ECGs collected from 2,813 patients between 2016 and 2024 were analyzed using a previously developed and validated AI-ECG model. LVSD was defined as an ejection fraction of ≤ 40%. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on a threshold that achieved 90% sensitivity. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2,813 LBBB patients (mean age, 70.7 years; male sex, 43.7%), hypertension and a history of heart failure were common. The AiTiALVSD model showed strong diagnostic performance for LVSD (AUROC, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.924-0.937]; AUPRC, 0.913 [95% CI, 0.902-0.923]; sensitivity, 0.979; specificity, 0.473). During the mean follow-up of 4.1 years, high-risk patients had significantly higher hazards than low-risk patients for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.28), implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (adjusted HR, 15.2; 95% CI, 7.51-30.77), and cardiovascular hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AiTiALVSD effectively detects LVSD and stratifies long-term cardiovascular risk in LBBB patients, supporting its clinical utility for early detection and patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":15229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44348-026-00066-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) significantly increases the risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) due to cardiac dyssynchrony. Although artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) models show promise in detecting LVSD, their performance in LBBB patients remains underexplored. We hypothesized that an AI-ECG model clinically validated for detecting LVSD would accurately detect LVSD and predict future clinical outcomes in LBBB patients.

Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, 5,689 expert-validated LBBB ECGs collected from 2,813 patients between 2016 and 2024 were analyzed using a previously developed and validated AI-ECG model. LVSD was defined as an ejection fraction of ≤ 40%. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), sensitivity, and specificity. Patients were stratified into high- and low-risk groups based on a threshold that achieved 90% sensitivity. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare clinical outcomes.

Results: Among the 2,813 LBBB patients (mean age, 70.7 years; male sex, 43.7%), hypertension and a history of heart failure were common. The AiTiALVSD model showed strong diagnostic performance for LVSD (AUROC, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.924-0.937]; AUPRC, 0.913 [95% CI, 0.902-0.923]; sensitivity, 0.979; specificity, 0.473). During the mean follow-up of 4.1 years, high-risk patients had significantly higher hazards than low-risk patients for all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.28), implantable cardioverter defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation (adjusted HR, 15.2; 95% CI, 7.51-30.77), and cardiovascular hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.96-1.28).

Conclusions: AiTiALVSD effectively detects LVSD and stratifies long-term cardiovascular risk in LBBB patients, supporting its clinical utility for early detection and patient management.

使用人工智能心电图检测和预后分层左束支传导阻滞左心室收缩功能障碍。
背景:左束支阻滞(LBBB)显著增加心脏非同步化引起的左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)的风险。尽管人工智能心电图(AI-ECG)模型在检测LVSD方面显示出希望,但它们在LBBB患者中的表现仍有待探索。我们假设经临床验证的用于检测LVSD的AI-ECG模型可以准确地检测LVSD并预测LBBB患者未来的临床结果。方法:在这项回顾性多中心研究中,使用先前开发和验证的AI-ECG模型分析了2016年至2024年间从2,813例患者中收集的5,689张专家验证的LBBB心电图。LVSD定义为射血分数≤40%。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、精确召回曲线下面积(AUPRC)、灵敏度和特异性来评估模型的性能。根据达到90%敏感性的阈值,将患者分为高危组和低危组。Kaplan-Meier分析用于比较临床结果。结果:2813例LBBB患者(平均年龄70.7岁,男性43.7%)中,高血压和心力衰竭史较为常见。AiTiALVSD模型对LVSD具有较强的诊断效能(AUROC, 0.930 [95% CI, 0.924-0.937]; AUPRC, 0.913 [95% CI, 0.902-0.923];敏感性,0.979;特异性,0.473)。在平均4.1年的随访期间,高危患者的全因死亡率(校正危险比[HR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.53-2.28)、植入式心律转复除颤器/心脏再同步化治疗植入术(校正危险比,15.2;95% CI, 7.51-30.77)和心血管住院(校正危险比,1.11;95% CI, 0.96-1.28)的危险均显著高于低危患者。结论:AiTiALVSD可有效检测LBBB患者的LVSD,并对LBBB患者的长期心血管风险进行分层,支持其早期发现和患者管理的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书