Mentalization Profiles of Adolescents with Internalizing Disorders: Domain-specific Differences Compared to Typically Developing Adolescents.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Arushee Wahi, Bangalore N Roopesh, John Vijay Sagar Kommu
{"title":"Mentalization Profiles of Adolescents with Internalizing Disorders: Domain-specific Differences Compared to Typically Developing Adolescents.","authors":"Arushee Wahi, Bangalore N Roopesh, John Vijay Sagar Kommu","doi":"10.1177/02537176261419381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescence is a sensitive period for mentalization development and also marks the onset and exacerbation of psychiatric conditions. Mentalization impairments are transdiagnostic, but the literature primarily focuses on younger children and adults in Western cultures, with limited exploration in adolescents. This study aimed to explore the differences between mentalization profiles of adolescents with internalizing disorders (AID) and typically developing adolescents (TDA) in India.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample included 166 adolescents (aged 12-17), divided into the AID group (<i>n</i> = 83) diagnosed with either depression, anxiety, or somatoform/dissociative disorders, and the TDA group (<i>n</i> = 83) without any psychiatric illness, group-matched on age, gender, and years of formal education. The Mentalization Scale (MentS), the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youth (RFQ-Y), and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) were administered to both groups. In contrast, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale for Youth was administered only to the AID group to assess symptom severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mann-Whitney U tests revealed the AID group had significantly lower \"self-mentalization\" (r<sub>rb</sub> = 0.177) and \"Overall mentalization Ability\" (r<sub>rb</sub> = 0.311). No significant differences were found in \"other-mentalization\" and \"motivation to Mentalize.\" Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation revealed that \"Overall mentalization ability\" was significantly negatively correlated with internalizing and externalizing problems on the SDQ, whereas \"motivation to Mentalize\" was significantly positively correlated with emotional symptoms on the SDQ.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights differential impairments in mentalization domains between AID and TDA, providing novel insights into mentalization profiles of adolescents through a developmental lens with theoretical and clinical implications in addressing this transdiagnostic vulnerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":13476,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"02537176261419381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12893929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176261419381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescence is a sensitive period for mentalization development and also marks the onset and exacerbation of psychiatric conditions. Mentalization impairments are transdiagnostic, but the literature primarily focuses on younger children and adults in Western cultures, with limited exploration in adolescents. This study aimed to explore the differences between mentalization profiles of adolescents with internalizing disorders (AID) and typically developing adolescents (TDA) in India.

Methods: The sample included 166 adolescents (aged 12-17), divided into the AID group (n = 83) diagnosed with either depression, anxiety, or somatoform/dissociative disorders, and the TDA group (n = 83) without any psychiatric illness, group-matched on age, gender, and years of formal education. The Mentalization Scale (MentS), the Reflective Functioning Questionnaire for Youth (RFQ-Y), and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) were administered to both groups. In contrast, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale for Youth was administered only to the AID group to assess symptom severity.

Results: Mann-Whitney U tests revealed the AID group had significantly lower "self-mentalization" (rrb = 0.177) and "Overall mentalization Ability" (rrb = 0.311). No significant differences were found in "other-mentalization" and "motivation to Mentalize." Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation revealed that "Overall mentalization ability" was significantly negatively correlated with internalizing and externalizing problems on the SDQ, whereas "motivation to Mentalize" was significantly positively correlated with emotional symptoms on the SDQ.

Conclusion: This study highlights differential impairments in mentalization domains between AID and TDA, providing novel insights into mentalization profiles of adolescents through a developmental lens with theoretical and clinical implications in addressing this transdiagnostic vulnerability.

内化障碍青少年的心智化特征:与正常发育青少年相比的领域特异性差异。
背景:青春期是心理化发展的敏感时期,也是精神疾病发病和恶化的标志。精神障碍是跨诊断的,但文献主要集中在西方文化中的幼儿和成人,对青少年的探索有限。本研究旨在探讨印度内化障碍青少年(AID)与正常发育青少年(TDA)心理化特征的差异。方法:样本包括166名青少年(12-17岁),分为患有抑郁、焦虑或躯体形式/分离性障碍的AID组(n = 83)和没有任何精神疾病的TDA组(n = 83),年龄、性别和正规教育年数相匹配。两组均采用心理化量表(MentS)、青少年反思性功能问卷(RFQ-Y)和优势与困难问卷(SDQ)。相比之下,青年抑郁焦虑和压力量表仅用于评估AID组的症状严重程度。结果:经Mann-Whitney U检验,AID组“自我心智化”(rrb = 0.177)和“整体心智化能力”(rrb = 0.311)显著降低。在“他者心理化”和“心理化动机”方面没有发现显著差异。Spearman的秩序相关分析显示,“整体心智化能力”与SDQ上的内化和外化问题显著负相关,而“心智化动机”与SDQ上的情绪症状显著正相关。结论:本研究强调了AID和TDA在心智领域的差异损伤,通过发育视角对青少年的心智特征提供了新的见解,对解决这种跨诊断脆弱性具有理论和临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine (ISSN 0253-7176) was started in 1978 as the official publication of the Indian Psychiatric Society South Zonal Branch. The journal allows free access (Open Access) and is published Bimonthly. The Journal includes but is not limited to review articles, original research, opinions, and letters. The Editor and publisher accept no legal responsibility for any opinions, omissions or errors by the authors, nor do they approve of any product advertised within the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书